Effects of different fixatives over different fixation times, including Antigenfix, on immunohistochemical studies

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
J. Lenz, Dominika Macháčová, P. Konecná, L. Fiala, M. Kyllar, F. Tichý
{"title":"Effects of different fixatives over different fixation times, including Antigenfix, on immunohistochemical studies","authors":"J. Lenz, Dominika Macháčová, P. Konecná, L. Fiala, M. Kyllar, F. Tichý","doi":"10.2754/avb202291020179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tissue fixation is an essential step in the performance of ancillary studies, including immunohistochemistry. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of various fixatives and fixative times on immunohistochemistry (IHC) in bovine and porcine endometrium using progesterone receptors and SOX2 antibodies. Immunohistochemical staining with progesterone receptors and SOX2 was performed on tissue samples fixed in formalin, Antigenfix, Greenfix, Bouin’s solution and methacarn at 1.5, 8.5, 15.5, 29.5, 64.5, 189.5, 249.5, 309.5 and 369.5 days of fixation. Formalin and Antigenfix proved to be the best fixative for both short-term and long-term fixation for IHC. Bouin’s solution was partially applicable for short-term (24 h) fixation. Greenfix and methacarn were absolutely inappropriate fixatives for IHC (completely negative staining using methacarn). These results were obtained on an automated immunostainer using EDTA buffer pH 8.4 as the antigen retrieval solution. When the staining procedure was performed manually and citrate buffer with different pH values was used, weakly positive results were obtained with both progesterone receptors (pH 8 and 9) and SOX2 (pH 7.2); however, significantly lower staining quality was obtained using the methacarn fixative compared to aldehyde fixatives. The reported findings demonstrated the superiority of aldehyde fixatives (formalin and Antigenfix) over alcohol fixatives (methacarn) and fixatives combining both denaturing and cross-linking proteins (Greenfix and Bouin’s solution) for IHC. Antigen retrieval-IHC using EDTA buffer was found to be excellent for aldehyde fixatives, but proved to be completely unsuitable for methacarn, Greenfix, and Bouin’s solution.","PeriodicalId":7192,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Brno","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Brno","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202291020179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tissue fixation is an essential step in the performance of ancillary studies, including immunohistochemistry. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of various fixatives and fixative times on immunohistochemistry (IHC) in bovine and porcine endometrium using progesterone receptors and SOX2 antibodies. Immunohistochemical staining with progesterone receptors and SOX2 was performed on tissue samples fixed in formalin, Antigenfix, Greenfix, Bouin’s solution and methacarn at 1.5, 8.5, 15.5, 29.5, 64.5, 189.5, 249.5, 309.5 and 369.5 days of fixation. Formalin and Antigenfix proved to be the best fixative for both short-term and long-term fixation for IHC. Bouin’s solution was partially applicable for short-term (24 h) fixation. Greenfix and methacarn were absolutely inappropriate fixatives for IHC (completely negative staining using methacarn). These results were obtained on an automated immunostainer using EDTA buffer pH 8.4 as the antigen retrieval solution. When the staining procedure was performed manually and citrate buffer with different pH values was used, weakly positive results were obtained with both progesterone receptors (pH 8 and 9) and SOX2 (pH 7.2); however, significantly lower staining quality was obtained using the methacarn fixative compared to aldehyde fixatives. The reported findings demonstrated the superiority of aldehyde fixatives (formalin and Antigenfix) over alcohol fixatives (methacarn) and fixatives combining both denaturing and cross-linking proteins (Greenfix and Bouin’s solution) for IHC. Antigen retrieval-IHC using EDTA buffer was found to be excellent for aldehyde fixatives, but proved to be completely unsuitable for methacarn, Greenfix, and Bouin’s solution.
不同固定剂在不同固定时间对免疫组织化学研究的影响,包括抗原固定剂
组织固定是辅助研究的重要步骤,包括免疫组织化学。本研究的目的是比较不同固定剂和固定时间对牛和猪子宫内膜免疫组织化学(IHC)的影响,使用孕酮受体和SOX2抗体。在固定后1.5、8.5、15.5、29.5、64.5、189.5、249.5、309.5和369.5天,用孕酮受体和SOX2对固定在福尔马林、Antigenfix、Greenfix、Bouin’s溶液和methacarn中的组织进行免疫组化染色。福尔马林和Antigenfix被证明是IHC短期和长期固定的最佳固定剂。Bouin溶液部分适用于短期(24 h)固定。Greenfix和methacarn绝对不适合用于免疫组化(使用methacarn进行完全阴性染色)。这些结果是在使用EDTA缓冲液pH 8.4作为抗原回收溶液的自动免疫染色机上获得的。人工染色时,使用不同pH值的柠檬酸缓冲液,黄体酮受体(pH 8和9)和SOX2 (pH 7.2)均呈弱阳性;然而,与乙醛固定剂相比,使用甲基活性炭固定剂获得的染色质量明显较低。报告的结果表明,乙醛固定剂(福尔马林和Antigenfix)优于醇固定剂(甲沙康)和结合变性和交联蛋白的固定剂(Greenfix和Bouin 's溶液)。使用EDTA缓冲液的抗原提取-免疫组化对乙醛固定剂有很好的效果,但对methacarn、Greenfix和Bouin’s溶液完全不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Brno
Acta Veterinaria Brno 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: ACTA VETERINARIA BRNO is a scientific journal of the University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences in Brno, Czech Republic. The scientific journal Acta Veterinaria Brno is dedicated to the publication of original research findings and clinical observations in veterinary and biomedical sciences. Original scientific research articles reporting new and substantial contribution to veterinary science and original methods that have not been submitted for publication elsewhere are considered for publication. A written statement to this effect should accompany the manuscript, along with approval for publication by the author´s head of department. The authors bear full responsibility for the contents of their contribution. Book reviews are published, too.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信