Feels Right … Go Ahead? When to Trust Your Feelings in Judgments and Decisions

Michel Tuan Pham
{"title":"Feels Right … Go Ahead? When to Trust Your Feelings in Judgments and Decisions","authors":"Michel Tuan Pham","doi":"10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Not only are subjective feelings an integral part of many judgments and decisions, they can even lead to improved decisions and better predictions. Individuals who have learned to trust their feelings performed better in economic-negotiation games than their rational-thinking opponents. But emotions are not just relevant in negotiations and decisions. They also play a decisive role in forecasting future events. Candidates who trusted their feelings made better predictions than people with less emotional confidence. Emotions contain valuable information about the world around us. This information is not as readily available in our mind as hard facts but rather lies in the background of our conscious attention. In negotiation situations like the ultimatum game, feelings provide an intuitive sense of what offer is about right and what offer is too high or too low. But feelings also summarize statistical relationships among things that, on the surface, may seem disconnected. These statistical relationships make more probable futures feel more right than less probable futures. However, researchers warn that you should not always trust your feelings. Feelings that tend to help are those based on general knowledge, not those based on easy-to-verbalize local knowledge.","PeriodicalId":30678,"journal":{"name":"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"22 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Not only are subjective feelings an integral part of many judgments and decisions, they can even lead to improved decisions and better predictions. Individuals who have learned to trust their feelings performed better in economic-negotiation games than their rational-thinking opponents. But emotions are not just relevant in negotiations and decisions. They also play a decisive role in forecasting future events. Candidates who trusted their feelings made better predictions than people with less emotional confidence. Emotions contain valuable information about the world around us. This information is not as readily available in our mind as hard facts but rather lies in the background of our conscious attention. In negotiation situations like the ultimatum game, feelings provide an intuitive sense of what offer is about right and what offer is too high or too low. But feelings also summarize statistical relationships among things that, on the surface, may seem disconnected. These statistical relationships make more probable futures feel more right than less probable futures. However, researchers warn that you should not always trust your feelings. Feelings that tend to help are those based on general knowledge, not those based on easy-to-verbalize local knowledge.
感觉不错…继续?什么时候相信自己的判断和决定
主观感受不仅是许多判断和决定的组成部分,甚至可以改善决策和更好的预测。在经济谈判游戏中,学会相信自己感觉的人比理性思维的对手表现得更好。但情绪不仅仅与谈判和决策有关。它们在预测未来事件方面也起着决定性的作用。相信自己感觉的候选人比情绪不那么自信的人做出了更好的预测。情绪包含了我们周围世界的宝贵信息。这些信息不像确凿的事实那样容易在我们的头脑中获得,而是存在于我们有意识的注意背景中。在像最后通牒游戏这样的谈判情境中,感觉提供了一种直观的感觉,即什么样的出价是正确的,什么样的出价太高或太低。但情感也概括了事物之间的统计关系,表面上看,这些关系似乎是不相关的。这些统计关系使得更可能的未来比不太可能的未来感觉更正确。然而,研究人员警告说,你不应该总是相信自己的感觉。有帮助的感觉往往是那些基于一般知识的感觉,而不是那些基于易于用语言表达的局部知识的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信