Action Research on the Possibilities on Tangential Research: An Opportunity to Explore Prospectively in that Uncatalogued Box

S. Bowler
{"title":"Action Research on the Possibilities on Tangential Research: An Opportunity to Explore Prospectively in that Uncatalogued Box","authors":"S. Bowler","doi":"10.25071/0848-1563.39664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Action research is a process whereby the researcher becomes the subject within their own study. This essay is a reflection on the opportunity I recently had to work with a number of historians on a book entitled Canadian Baptist Women. Although this paper is specific to my current work, the resulting reflection on this work has allowed me to propose a research model that I hope will form a useful model for future works. In reflecting on both the process that had the Canadian Baptist Historical Society initiate the work and the writers that either stepped forward to write or stepped back from the process, I sought to reflect on a model that might explain the book’s development that would be useful for future historical endeavours. At this point, I am in no way able to analyze whether my perceptions of the process truly reflected those of my co-writer colleagues, but that does not really matter. What I am proposing within this paper is that, although the action research process was instrumental in my developing a model, it was this product, a historical research model, that seems most useful. Over several years I attended with great interest the annual meetings of both the Canadian Baptist Historical Society and the Canadian Society of Church History. I noticed that questions were often posed to presenters that were at the periphery or tangential to their research. Often it seemed that the questioners had some interest either because of their own research focus, or a tangent that the speaker struck within their presentation, or with","PeriodicalId":81435,"journal":{"name":"Historical papers. Canadian Historical Association. Meeting","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical papers. Canadian Historical Association. Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/0848-1563.39664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Action research is a process whereby the researcher becomes the subject within their own study. This essay is a reflection on the opportunity I recently had to work with a number of historians on a book entitled Canadian Baptist Women. Although this paper is specific to my current work, the resulting reflection on this work has allowed me to propose a research model that I hope will form a useful model for future works. In reflecting on both the process that had the Canadian Baptist Historical Society initiate the work and the writers that either stepped forward to write or stepped back from the process, I sought to reflect on a model that might explain the book’s development that would be useful for future historical endeavours. At this point, I am in no way able to analyze whether my perceptions of the process truly reflected those of my co-writer colleagues, but that does not really matter. What I am proposing within this paper is that, although the action research process was instrumental in my developing a model, it was this product, a historical research model, that seems most useful. Over several years I attended with great interest the annual meetings of both the Canadian Baptist Historical Society and the Canadian Society of Church History. I noticed that questions were often posed to presenters that were at the periphery or tangential to their research. Often it seemed that the questioners had some interest either because of their own research focus, or a tangent that the speaker struck within their presentation, or with
对切线研究可能性的行动研究:在未编目的盒子中进行前瞻性探索的机会
行动研究是一个研究人员成为自己研究对象的过程。这篇文章是对我最近有机会与一些历史学家合作撰写一本名为《加拿大浸信会妇女》的书的反思。虽然这篇论文是针对我目前的工作,但由此产生的对这项工作的反思使我能够提出一个研究模型,我希望能对未来的工作形成一个有用的模型。在反思加拿大浸信会历史学会发起这项工作的过程,以及那些参与或退出这项工作的作家们的过程时,我试图反思一种模式,这种模式可能会解释这本书的发展,对未来的历史研究有用。在这一点上,我无法分析我对这个过程的看法是否真的反映了我的合著者同事的看法,但这并不重要。我在这篇论文中提出的观点是,尽管行动研究过程对我建立一个模型很有帮助,但这个产品,一个历史研究模型,似乎是最有用的。几年来,我怀着极大的兴趣参加了加拿大浸信会历史学会和加拿大教会历史学会的年会。我注意到,演讲者提出的问题往往与他们的研究无关。通常情况下,提问者似乎有一些兴趣,要么是因为他们自己的研究重点,要么是因为演讲者在他们的演讲中偏离了正题,或者是与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书