Scholarship on Women, Gender, and the Reformation: Developments in Recent Years

L. Jurgens
{"title":"Scholarship on Women, Gender, and the Reformation: Developments in Recent Years","authors":"L. Jurgens","doi":"10.25071/0848-1563.39677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional historical studies, written and presented by conventional historians, capture the male experience and present this experience as universal. It is for this reason that traditional historical studies have been called “Men’s History.” Within these studies women are not typically mentioned unless they were related to an important male figure or “very occasionally and exceptionally, women who performed roles generally reserved for men.” In other words, women are not usually considered worth discussing in historical works that follow traditional historical methods. Conventional historians exclude women because they are solely considered in relation to marriage, family life, and the “house” and thus appear to have no history of their own. Heide Wunder explains that “their economic, social, and cultural accomplishments were seen as ‘close to nature,’ or of minor importance, or the result merely of passive execution.” Conventional historians and traditional historical methods neglect social contexts and are oriented toward political or constitutional","PeriodicalId":81435,"journal":{"name":"Historical papers. Canadian Historical Association. Meeting","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical papers. Canadian Historical Association. Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/0848-1563.39677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional historical studies, written and presented by conventional historians, capture the male experience and present this experience as universal. It is for this reason that traditional historical studies have been called “Men’s History.” Within these studies women are not typically mentioned unless they were related to an important male figure or “very occasionally and exceptionally, women who performed roles generally reserved for men.” In other words, women are not usually considered worth discussing in historical works that follow traditional historical methods. Conventional historians exclude women because they are solely considered in relation to marriage, family life, and the “house” and thus appear to have no history of their own. Heide Wunder explains that “their economic, social, and cultural accomplishments were seen as ‘close to nature,’ or of minor importance, or the result merely of passive execution.” Conventional historians and traditional historical methods neglect social contexts and are oriented toward political or constitutional
关于妇女、性别与改革的学术研究:近年来的发展
由传统历史学家撰写和呈现的传统历史研究,捕捉到了男性的经历,并将这种经历呈现为普遍的。正是因为这个原因,传统的历史研究被称为“男人的历史”。在这些研究中,女性通常不会被提及,除非她们与一个重要的男性人物有关,或者“非常偶然和例外地,女性扮演了通常为男性保留的角色”。换句话说,在遵循传统历史方法的历史作品中,女性通常不被认为值得讨论。传统的历史学家把女性排除在外,因为他们只考虑女性与婚姻、家庭生活和“房子”的关系,因此似乎没有自己的历史。海德·文德尔解释说,“他们的经济、社会和文化成就被视为‘接近自然’,或者无足轻重,或者仅仅是被动执行的结果。”传统的历史学家和传统的历史方法忽视了社会背景,并以政治或宪法为导向
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书