Wie sowjetische Musik „vaterländisch“ wurde, oder: Die Avantgarde im Spät- und Postsozialismus neu erfinden (1970–1998)

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Boris Belge
{"title":"Wie sowjetische Musik „vaterländisch“ wurde, oder: Die Avantgarde im Spät- und Postsozialismus neu erfinden (1970–1998)","authors":"Boris Belge","doi":"10.25162/JGO-2019-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last decades of the Soviet Union, composers and musicians witnessed a dissolution of the contexts in which they were used to inventing and performing music. “Soviet Music”, a vague but inclusive umbrella term for serious music production, took one of two different directions: on the one hand, it increasingly became part of a global musical avant-garde, on the other hand it was forced to adapt to increasingly narrow, Russocentric and even nationalistic attitudes. This contribution investigates ambiguities surrounding these attributes as well as the concrete problems they created for three composers - Sofia Gubaidulina, Alfred Schnittke and Edison Denisov. In particular, it concentrates on fictions of authenticity created by a milestone of Soviet cinema: Farewell to Matera by Ėlem Klimov and Larisa Shepitko. In doing so, the article questions “1991” as an important caesura and instead makes a case for conceptualizing late and post-Soviet socialism as one common period in Russian musical history.","PeriodicalId":54097,"journal":{"name":"JAHRBUCHER FUR GESCHICHTE OSTEUROPAS","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAHRBUCHER FUR GESCHICHTE OSTEUROPAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/JGO-2019-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last decades of the Soviet Union, composers and musicians witnessed a dissolution of the contexts in which they were used to inventing and performing music. “Soviet Music”, a vague but inclusive umbrella term for serious music production, took one of two different directions: on the one hand, it increasingly became part of a global musical avant-garde, on the other hand it was forced to adapt to increasingly narrow, Russocentric and even nationalistic attitudes. This contribution investigates ambiguities surrounding these attributes as well as the concrete problems they created for three composers - Sofia Gubaidulina, Alfred Schnittke and Edison Denisov. In particular, it concentrates on fictions of authenticity created by a milestone of Soviet cinema: Farewell to Matera by Ėlem Klimov and Larisa Shepitko. In doing so, the article questions “1991” as an important caesura and instead makes a case for conceptualizing late and post-Soviet socialism as one common period in Russian musical history.
苏联音乐是如何“时段”或“七十后社会主义”复燃的?
在苏联的最后几十年里,作曲家和音乐家见证了他们用来创作和表演音乐的环境的解体。“苏联音乐”是一个模糊但包涵广泛的严肃音乐制作的总称,它有两个不同的方向:一方面,它日益成为全球音乐先锋派的一部分,另一方面,它被迫适应日益狭隘的、以俄罗斯为中心的,甚至是民族主义的态度。这篇文章调查了围绕这些属性的模糊之处,以及他们为三位作曲家——索菲亚·古拜杜丽娜、阿尔弗雷德·施尼特克和爱迪生·杰尼索夫——创造的具体问题。特别地,它集中于苏联电影的一个里程碑:Ėlem克里莫夫和拉里萨·舍列科的《告别马泰拉》所创造的真实小说。在这样做的过程中,文章质疑“1991”作为一个重要的停顿,而是提出了一个案例,将苏联后期和后苏联社会主义概念化为俄罗斯音乐史上的一个共同时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信