Emancipatory Movements in Composition: The Rhetoric of Possibility

IF 0.5 0 LITERATURE
A. Greenbaum
{"title":"Emancipatory Movements in Composition: The Rhetoric of Possibility","authors":"A. Greenbaum","doi":"10.2307/3594226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The project Andrea Greenbaum attempts in EmancipatoryMovements in Composition is both worthwhile and ambitious. The project is worthwhile because introducing newcomers, particularly graduate students, to the multiple disciplines that have been incorporated into critical pedagogy in the last decade can be daunting, and there is certainly room in the field for a text that names and organizes them. The project is ambitious because it attempts to do this in a mere one hundred pages, with additional pages devoted to an appended syllabus, notes, and citations. Greenbaum opens her book with a personal narrative of the Passover story, drawing from it the lesson that \"human beings need to experience oppression-even if it is relived only mythically-in order to understand our social responsibility to counter and resist those forces that seek to dominate, repress, and disempower individuals\" (xi), setting the polemical tone she maintains through the rest of the work. She organizes the book around what she identifies as four key approaches to critical pedagogy for the writing classroom: neosophistic rhetoric, cultural studies, feminist studies, and postcolonial studies, examining each for what they offer writing teachers seeking to enact critical pedagogy in their classrooms. Her first two chapters offer a brief historical development of sophistic rhetoric and cultural studies approaches. Greenbaum begins with the reclamation of a sophistic rhetoric, drawing particularly on Susan Jarratt, Thomas Kent, John Poulakos, Sharon Crowley, and a handful of others. She proposes that this neosophistic rhetoric contributes to a \"rhetoric of possibility\" by drawing attention to the indeterminacy of language, an empowering shift from a logos privileged in Western philosophy to a mythos that invites disruptive stoof the frontier is reconstrued as a collabo ative zone of cultur l and linguistic contact, \"a historical moment of meeting, clashing, and cooperating ulticultura encounters\" (66).","PeriodicalId":47107,"journal":{"name":"COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION","volume":"55 1","pages":"369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3594226","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3594226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The project Andrea Greenbaum attempts in EmancipatoryMovements in Composition is both worthwhile and ambitious. The project is worthwhile because introducing newcomers, particularly graduate students, to the multiple disciplines that have been incorporated into critical pedagogy in the last decade can be daunting, and there is certainly room in the field for a text that names and organizes them. The project is ambitious because it attempts to do this in a mere one hundred pages, with additional pages devoted to an appended syllabus, notes, and citations. Greenbaum opens her book with a personal narrative of the Passover story, drawing from it the lesson that "human beings need to experience oppression-even if it is relived only mythically-in order to understand our social responsibility to counter and resist those forces that seek to dominate, repress, and disempower individuals" (xi), setting the polemical tone she maintains through the rest of the work. She organizes the book around what she identifies as four key approaches to critical pedagogy for the writing classroom: neosophistic rhetoric, cultural studies, feminist studies, and postcolonial studies, examining each for what they offer writing teachers seeking to enact critical pedagogy in their classrooms. Her first two chapters offer a brief historical development of sophistic rhetoric and cultural studies approaches. Greenbaum begins with the reclamation of a sophistic rhetoric, drawing particularly on Susan Jarratt, Thomas Kent, John Poulakos, Sharon Crowley, and a handful of others. She proposes that this neosophistic rhetoric contributes to a "rhetoric of possibility" by drawing attention to the indeterminacy of language, an empowering shift from a logos privileged in Western philosophy to a mythos that invites disruptive stoof the frontier is reconstrued as a collabo ative zone of cultur l and linguistic contact, "a historical moment of meeting, clashing, and cooperating ulticultura encounters" (66).
作曲中的解放运动:可能性的修辞
安德里亚·格林鲍姆(Andrea Greenbaum)在《作曲中的解放运动》(emancipation movements in Composition)中所尝试的项目是值得的,也是雄心勃勃的。这个项目是值得的,因为向新来者,特别是研究生,介绍过去十年被纳入批判性教育学的多个学科是令人望而生畏的,在这个领域当然有空间来命名和组织这些学科。这个项目是雄心勃勃的,因为它试图在仅仅100页的篇幅内做到这一点,另外的篇幅专门用于附加的教学大纲、注释和引文。格林鲍姆以她对逾越节故事的个人叙述作为本书的开篇,从中吸取教训:“人类需要经历压迫——即使只是在神话中重演——以便理解我们对抗和抵制那些试图统治、压制和剥夺个人权力的力量的社会责任”(11),这奠定了她在余下的作品中始终坚持的辩论基调。她围绕写作课堂的批判性教学法的四种关键方法组织了这本书:新哲学修辞学,文化研究,女权主义研究和后殖民研究,检查了它们为写作教师提供的东西,这些教师试图在课堂上实施批判性教学法。她的前两章简要介绍了诡辩修辞学和文化研究方法的历史发展。格林鲍姆以一种诡辩的修辞开始,特别引用了苏珊·贾拉特、托马斯·肯特、约翰·普拉克斯、莎伦·克劳利和其他一些人。她提出,这种新诡辩的修辞学通过关注语言的不确定性,促成了一种“可能性的修辞学”,一种从西方哲学中特权的逻各斯到一种神话的授权转变,这种转变邀请了破坏性的边界,被重新解释为文化和语言接触的合作区域,“一个文化相遇、冲突和合作的历史时刻”(66)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: College Composition and Communication publishes research and scholarship in rhetoric and composition studies that supports college teachers in reflecting on and improving their practices in teaching writing and that reflects the most current scholarship and theory in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信