Model-based evaluation of methane emissions from paddy fields in East Asia

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Akihiko Ito, S. Inoue, M. Inatomi
{"title":"Model-based evaluation of methane emissions from paddy fields in East Asia","authors":"Akihiko Ito, S. Inoue, M. Inatomi","doi":"10.2480/agrmet.d-21-00037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluating regional budgets of methane ( CH 4 ) , a potent greenhouse gas and short‑lived climate forcer, is an important task for future climate management. This study estimated historical CH 4 emissions from paddy fields in East Asia by using a process‑based terrestrial biogeochemical model driven by climate and land‑use data. To capture the range of estimation uncertainty, this study used two CH 4 emission schemes, four paddy field maps, and two seasonal inundation methods for a total of 16 simulations. The mean CH 4 emission rate during 2000 ‑ 2015 was estimated to be 5.7 Tg CH 4 yr ‑1 , which is similar to statistical inventories and other estimates. However, the large standard deviation ( ± 3.2 Tg CH 4 yr ‑1 ) among the simulations implies that serious estimation uncertainties remain. Three factors ‑ CH 4 emission scheme, paddy field map, and inundation seasonality ‑ were responsible for the disparity of the estimates. Because of the lack of historical management data, the model simulation did not show a decreasing trend in the agricultural CH 4 emissions. A sensitivity analysis for temperature indicated that a 1 ‑ 2 ° C temperature rise ( typical warming in mitigation‑oriented scenarios ) would substantially enhance CH 4 emissions. However, a sensitivity analysis for water management indicated that a lower water‑table depth would largely mitigate the emission increase. Additional studies to improve agricultural datasets and models for better paddy field management are still needed.","PeriodicalId":56074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Meteorology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.d-21-00037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Evaluating regional budgets of methane ( CH 4 ) , a potent greenhouse gas and short‑lived climate forcer, is an important task for future climate management. This study estimated historical CH 4 emissions from paddy fields in East Asia by using a process‑based terrestrial biogeochemical model driven by climate and land‑use data. To capture the range of estimation uncertainty, this study used two CH 4 emission schemes, four paddy field maps, and two seasonal inundation methods for a total of 16 simulations. The mean CH 4 emission rate during 2000 ‑ 2015 was estimated to be 5.7 Tg CH 4 yr ‑1 , which is similar to statistical inventories and other estimates. However, the large standard deviation ( ± 3.2 Tg CH 4 yr ‑1 ) among the simulations implies that serious estimation uncertainties remain. Three factors ‑ CH 4 emission scheme, paddy field map, and inundation seasonality ‑ were responsible for the disparity of the estimates. Because of the lack of historical management data, the model simulation did not show a decreasing trend in the agricultural CH 4 emissions. A sensitivity analysis for temperature indicated that a 1 ‑ 2 ° C temperature rise ( typical warming in mitigation‑oriented scenarios ) would substantially enhance CH 4 emissions. However, a sensitivity analysis for water management indicated that a lower water‑table depth would largely mitigate the emission increase. Additional studies to improve agricultural datasets and models for better paddy field management are still needed.
基于模型的东亚稻田甲烷排放评价
甲烷是一种强有力的温室气体和短期气候强迫物,评估甲烷的区域预算是未来气候管理的一项重要任务。本研究利用气候和土地利用数据驱动的基于过程的陆地生物地球化学模型估算了东亚稻田的历史甲烷排放量。为了获取估算不确定性的范围,本研究使用了两种甲烷排放方案、四种水田图和两种季节性淹没方法,共进行了16次模拟。2000 - 2015年期间的平均甲烷排放率估计为5.7 Tg甲烷年- 1,这与统计清单和其他估计值相似。然而,模拟中的大标准偏差(±3.2 Tg CH 4 yr - 1)意味着仍然存在严重的估计不确定性。三个因素——甲烷排放方案、水田图和淹没季节性——是造成估算差异的原因。由于缺乏历史管理数据,模型模拟没有显示出农业ch4排放减少的趋势。对温度的敏感性分析表明,温度上升1 - 2°C(面向缓解的情景中的典型变暖)将大大增加甲烷排放。然而,对水资源管理的敏感性分析表明,较低的地下水位将在很大程度上减缓排放的增加。还需要进一步的研究来改进农业数据集和模型,以便更好地管理水田。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Meteorology
Journal of Agricultural Meteorology AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: For over 70 years, the Journal of Agricultural Meteorology has published original papers and review articles on the science of physical and biological processes in natural and managed ecosystems. Published topics include, but are not limited to, weather disasters, local climate, micrometeorology, climate change, soil environment, plant phenology, plant response to environmental change, crop growth and yield prediction, instrumentation, and environmental control across a wide range of managed ecosystems, from open fields to greenhouses and plant factories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信