Characterization of canopy structure for high-yield performance of greenhouse-grown satsuma mandarins using direct measurements and indirect estimations

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Taku Yano, D. Yasutake, Yoshinobu Kiyosue
{"title":"Characterization of canopy structure for high-yield performance of greenhouse-grown satsuma mandarins using direct measurements and indirect estimations","authors":"Taku Yano, D. Yasutake, Yoshinobu Kiyosue","doi":"10.2480/agrmet.d-21-00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under assuming that high‑yield canopy structure would be simply explained by a given index, orchard productivity of greenhouse‑grown early‑flowering satsuma mandarins “Miyagawa wase” was assessed using conventional modified‑open‑center‑training and trellis‑training methods. This was done by using universal indices that assist with determining yield in relation to canopy structure. Leaf area index was the optimum index for determining fruit yield. Empirical extinction coefficients showed negative linear trends with yield. Either plant area index, estimated by using a plant canopy analyzer, and crown cover showed poor correlation with fruit yield. To effectively predict yield from leaf area index, a direct measurement is recommended rather than an indirect optical method. Trellis‑trained trees were superior to modified‑open‑center‑trained trees. This is because trellis‑trained trees had higher fruit productivity up untill 10 yeas old, and because 15‑year‑olds had better canopy light distrubution patterns when compared with modified open‑center‑trained trees. Based on the costs associated with planting seedlings and the labor‑efficiency due to width of free alley, trellis‑training 2.2 m × 1.0 m plots was optimum for planting. In this study, even when accounting for the measurement error of woody elements, empirical extinction coefficients was a good index to base yield productivity. This is because this index directly represents vertical canopy light distribution. Additionally, the clumping index, calculated by using direct measurement and indirect optical method, was suggested to relate to canopy light distribution, however, further study must be essential.","PeriodicalId":56074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Meteorology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.d-21-00018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Under assuming that high‑yield canopy structure would be simply explained by a given index, orchard productivity of greenhouse‑grown early‑flowering satsuma mandarins “Miyagawa wase” was assessed using conventional modified‑open‑center‑training and trellis‑training methods. This was done by using universal indices that assist with determining yield in relation to canopy structure. Leaf area index was the optimum index for determining fruit yield. Empirical extinction coefficients showed negative linear trends with yield. Either plant area index, estimated by using a plant canopy analyzer, and crown cover showed poor correlation with fruit yield. To effectively predict yield from leaf area index, a direct measurement is recommended rather than an indirect optical method. Trellis‑trained trees were superior to modified‑open‑center‑trained trees. This is because trellis‑trained trees had higher fruit productivity up untill 10 yeas old, and because 15‑year‑olds had better canopy light distrubution patterns when compared with modified open‑center‑trained trees. Based on the costs associated with planting seedlings and the labor‑efficiency due to width of free alley, trellis‑training 2.2 m × 1.0 m plots was optimum for planting. In this study, even when accounting for the measurement error of woody elements, empirical extinction coefficients was a good index to base yield productivity. This is because this index directly represents vertical canopy light distribution. Additionally, the clumping index, calculated by using direct measurement and indirect optical method, was suggested to relate to canopy light distribution, however, further study must be essential.
利用直接测量和间接估算的方法表征温室栽培柑橘高产的冠层结构
在假设高产树冠结构可以简单地用一个给定的指数来解释的前提下,采用传统的改良开放式中心训练法和棚架训练法对温室栽培早花宫川蜜橘果园生产力进行了评估。这是通过使用有助于确定与冠层结构有关的产量的通用指数来完成的。叶面积指数是测定果实产量的最佳指标。经验消光系数与产量呈负线性关系。用植物冠层分析仪估算的植物面积指数和冠层盖度与果实产量均表现出较差的相关性。为了有效地预测叶面积指数的产量,建议直接测量而不是间接的光学方法。棚架训练的树木优于改良开放中心训练的树木。这是因为棚架训练的树木在10岁之前的果实产量更高,而且与改良的开放式中心训练的树木相比,15岁的树木有更好的冠层光分布模式。综合考虑种苗成本和自由通道宽度所带来的劳动效率,选择2.2 m × 1.0 m的棚架种植面积为最优。在本研究中,即使考虑到木质元素的测量误差,经验消光系数也能很好地反映基本产量。这是因为该指数直接代表了冠层的垂直光分布。此外,通过直接测量和间接光学方法计算得出的丛集指数与冠层光分布有关,但仍需进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Meteorology
Journal of Agricultural Meteorology AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: For over 70 years, the Journal of Agricultural Meteorology has published original papers and review articles on the science of physical and biological processes in natural and managed ecosystems. Published topics include, but are not limited to, weather disasters, local climate, micrometeorology, climate change, soil environment, plant phenology, plant response to environmental change, crop growth and yield prediction, instrumentation, and environmental control across a wide range of managed ecosystems, from open fields to greenhouses and plant factories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信