Common Transit Procedure and NCTS Implementation: the Case of Ukraine

Q2 Social Sciences
Roman Kril
{"title":"Common Transit Procedure and NCTS Implementation: the Case of Ukraine","authors":"Roman Kril","doi":"10.26886/2524-101x.7.3.2021.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the EU policies towards the extension of a Common Transit Procedure and the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS) over associated countries given a case of Ukraine. A reasonable amount of the EU actions and aid on implementing the NCTS are performed within frameworks of the Eastern Neighbourhood Policy. It is instrumental for approximation of customs legislation, capacity budling, and modernization of customs authorities of the EU neighboring states. However, the impact of the NCTS implementation goes far beyond mere transit arrangements. It has the potential to introduce basic principles of the EU administrative law and best practices of administration into the day-by-day performance of national customs authorities. Ukrainian customs have favorable start conditions; so far, the national customs authorities and traders have experience in utilizing customs IT solutions. However, the transition to the new transit procedure may face specific issues due to disproportionately strict authorization criteria for transit simplification set by national legislation that exceeds the relevant rules of the EU legislation. Such restrictions cause low popularity of the new procedures harmonized with the EU legislation. Besides, in some cases, the approximation to the EU customs legislation results in discontinuing the existing simplification of customs procedures, which raises the question of possible distortions in the implementation of respective obligations and failure to share basic principles of good administration promoted by the EU.","PeriodicalId":36374,"journal":{"name":"Lex Portus","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Portus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101x.7.3.2021.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article analyses the EU policies towards the extension of a Common Transit Procedure and the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS) over associated countries given a case of Ukraine. A reasonable amount of the EU actions and aid on implementing the NCTS are performed within frameworks of the Eastern Neighbourhood Policy. It is instrumental for approximation of customs legislation, capacity budling, and modernization of customs authorities of the EU neighboring states. However, the impact of the NCTS implementation goes far beyond mere transit arrangements. It has the potential to introduce basic principles of the EU administrative law and best practices of administration into the day-by-day performance of national customs authorities. Ukrainian customs have favorable start conditions; so far, the national customs authorities and traders have experience in utilizing customs IT solutions. However, the transition to the new transit procedure may face specific issues due to disproportionately strict authorization criteria for transit simplification set by national legislation that exceeds the relevant rules of the EU legislation. Such restrictions cause low popularity of the new procedures harmonized with the EU legislation. Besides, in some cases, the approximation to the EU customs legislation results in discontinuing the existing simplification of customs procedures, which raises the question of possible distortions in the implementation of respective obligations and failure to share basic principles of good administration promoted by the EU.
共同过境程序和国家过境服务系统的实施:以乌克兰为例
本文以乌克兰为例,分析了欧盟对联合国家延长共同过境程序和新计算机化过境系统(NCTS)的政策。在东部邻国政策的框架内,欧盟在实施国家合作中心方面采取了相当数量的行动和援助。它有助于欧盟邻国海关立法的近似化、能力规划和海关当局的现代化。然而,实施国家运输系统的影响远远超出了单纯的过境安排。它有可能将欧盟行政法的基本原则和最佳行政做法引入各国海关当局的日常工作中。乌克兰海关起步条件有利;到目前为止,各国海关当局和贸易商在使用海关IT解决方案方面都有经验。然而,过渡到新的过境程序可能会面临一些具体问题,因为国家立法为过境简化制定的授权标准过于严格,超过了欧盟立法的相关规则。这些限制导致与欧盟立法相协调的新程序不受欢迎。此外,在某些情况下,与欧盟海关法例的趋同会导致现行简化海关程序的工作停止,从而产生在履行各自义务方面可能出现扭曲的问题,以及未能分享欧盟所提倡的良好行政管理的基本原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lex Portus
Lex Portus Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信