Awareness of Radiation Dose and Incurred Risk Among Clinicians at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bahrain

Mazna Al Khalifa, Salah Alghanem, Abdulraoof AM Mohamad
{"title":"Awareness of Radiation Dose and Incurred Risk Among Clinicians at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bahrain","authors":"Mazna Al Khalifa, Salah Alghanem, Abdulraoof AM Mohamad","doi":"10.26715/jbms.35_1_5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objectives: Literature has raised concern about the inadequate knowledge of radiation dose and risk among referring clinicians for radiological procedures. Therefore, we surveyed to assess the knowledge of radiation protection and dose assessment among clinicians. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey where the link was circulated to 87 clinicians who requested diagnostic radiological imaging. A validated questionnaire consisted of 20 multiple-choice questions divided into three sections, viz, demography, awareness of radiation risk, and knowledge of radiation dose, were asked to reply. Results: A total of 87 physicians from 15 different medical specialties were included in the analysis. Interns had the highest knowledge score in radiation protection (59.5%, P=0.198), while the dose assessment score was highest among radiologists (50.8%, P=0.013). The average knowledge of radiation protection was 43% ± 17%, and awareness of radiation dose was 30% ± 18%. Clinicians having experience >20 years were found with the least score (33.3%) of radiation protection knowledge, while those with <3 years of experience showed a better score (48%, P=0.064). Clinicians who claimed to be attending radiation protection courses regularly were found with better scores of knowledge (47.6%, P=0.340) and dose assessment (37%, P=0.161), although the difference was nonsignificant. Conclusion: The clinician’s knowledge of radiation protection and dose assessment is inadequate which could infer a propensity of the inappropriate use of radiation imaging. There is a substantial need for training/refresher courses to improve the knowledge of radiation dose and consequent risk in order to assure patient safety during radiological examinations. Keywords: Ionizing radiation, Radiation dose, Risk awareness, Radiological examination, Diagnostic imaging","PeriodicalId":85027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26715/jbms.35_1_5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Literature has raised concern about the inadequate knowledge of radiation dose and risk among referring clinicians for radiological procedures. Therefore, we surveyed to assess the knowledge of radiation protection and dose assessment among clinicians. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey where the link was circulated to 87 clinicians who requested diagnostic radiological imaging. A validated questionnaire consisted of 20 multiple-choice questions divided into three sections, viz, demography, awareness of radiation risk, and knowledge of radiation dose, were asked to reply. Results: A total of 87 physicians from 15 different medical specialties were included in the analysis. Interns had the highest knowledge score in radiation protection (59.5%, P=0.198), while the dose assessment score was highest among radiologists (50.8%, P=0.013). The average knowledge of radiation protection was 43% ± 17%, and awareness of radiation dose was 30% ± 18%. Clinicians having experience >20 years were found with the least score (33.3%) of radiation protection knowledge, while those with <3 years of experience showed a better score (48%, P=0.064). Clinicians who claimed to be attending radiation protection courses regularly were found with better scores of knowledge (47.6%, P=0.340) and dose assessment (37%, P=0.161), although the difference was nonsignificant. Conclusion: The clinician’s knowledge of radiation protection and dose assessment is inadequate which could infer a propensity of the inappropriate use of radiation imaging. There is a substantial need for training/refresher courses to improve the knowledge of radiation dose and consequent risk in order to assure patient safety during radiological examinations. Keywords: Ionizing radiation, Radiation dose, Risk awareness, Radiological examination, Diagnostic imaging
巴林三级医院临床医生对辐射剂量和风险的认识
背景与目的:文献提出了关于转诊临床医生对放射治疗的辐射剂量和风险认识不足的担忧。因此,我们调查了临床医生的辐射防护知识和剂量评估。方法:一项基于网络的横断面调查,其中链接分发给要求诊断放射成像的87名临床医生。一份有效的问卷由20个选择题组成,分为人口统计、辐射风险意识和辐射剂量知识三个部分。结果:共纳入15个不同医学专科87名医师。实习医师辐射防护知识得分最高(59.5%,P=0.198),放射科医师剂量评估得分最高(50.8%,P=0.013)。平均辐射防护知识知晓率为43%±17%,辐射剂量知识知晓率为30%±18%。临床医生的放射防护知识得分最低(33.3%),而经验<3年的临床医生得分较高(48%,P=0.064)。声称定期参加放射防护课程的临床医生在知识(47.6%,P=0.340)和剂量评估(37%,P=0.161)方面得分较高,但差异无统计学意义。结论:临床医师对放射防护和剂量评估的知识不足,可能导致不适当使用放射影像学的倾向。为确保病人在接受放射检查时的安全,我们非常需要提供培训/进修课程,以提高他们对辐射剂量及其风险的认识。关键词:电离辐射,辐射剂量,风险意识,放射检查,诊断成像
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信