Primary colorectal anastomosis, no preparation, no stoma needed

K. A. Beerdawood, F. Alhmoud, A. A. A. Namoura, A. H. S. A. Briezat
{"title":"Primary colorectal anastomosis, no preparation, no stoma needed","authors":"K. A. Beerdawood, F. Alhmoud, A. A. A. Namoura, A. H. S. A. Briezat","doi":"10.26715/jbms.25_2_6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mechanical bowel preparation was regarded for a long time as a vital prerequisite for successful colorectal surgery; this is now being questioned. The distressful effect of bowel preparation, alongside the safety of primary colorectal anastomosis in emergency cases, has led to a considerable change in the surgical protocol, making primary repair and anastomosis after colon resection safer without bowel preparation, and the role of colostomy has changed from mandatory to optional. Aim: To assess whether colorectal surgery can be performed safely without mechanical bowel preparation or colostomy. Method: A series of 130 patients, who underwent elective and emergency colorectal surgery, were followed prospectively over a three-year period in Al Bashir Teaching Hospital, Amman, Jordan. The patients were randomized into two groups. In one group (preparation group) 66 elective patients were selected from the outpatient department; the bowel was prepared using Fortran’s solution. In the second group (non-preparation group), 64 patients were selected from the emergency and outpatient departments, no bowel preparation was used. Colostomy was omitted in both groups. The main outcomes regarding operative time, hospital stay, rate of postoperative wound infection, anastomotic leak and intra-abdominal abscess were compared between the two groups. Results: Malignancy was the most prevalent pathology in both the preparation and non-preparation groups, 75.7% and 62.5% respectively, while benign diseases were present in up to 24.2% of the preparation group and in 1.5% of the non-preparation group. Anastomosis was ileo-colic in 33.3% and 37.5%, colo-colic or colo-rectal in 66.6% and 62.5% of the preparation and non-preparation groups respectively. There was no significant statistical difference in the overall postoperative complication rates between the two groups, 16.6% in the preparation group and 14% in the non-preparation group. Postoperative wound infection, wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal abscess and anastomotic leak occurred in 9.09%, 1.5%, 1.5% and 4.5% in the preparation group, as compared to 7.8%, 3.1%, 0% and 3.1% in the non-preparation group respectively. The mortality rate was nil in both groups. Conclusion: Resection of colorectal pathology followed by primary anastomosis, without stoma, can be performed safely with the omission of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation.","PeriodicalId":85027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26715/jbms.25_2_6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical bowel preparation was regarded for a long time as a vital prerequisite for successful colorectal surgery; this is now being questioned. The distressful effect of bowel preparation, alongside the safety of primary colorectal anastomosis in emergency cases, has led to a considerable change in the surgical protocol, making primary repair and anastomosis after colon resection safer without bowel preparation, and the role of colostomy has changed from mandatory to optional. Aim: To assess whether colorectal surgery can be performed safely without mechanical bowel preparation or colostomy. Method: A series of 130 patients, who underwent elective and emergency colorectal surgery, were followed prospectively over a three-year period in Al Bashir Teaching Hospital, Amman, Jordan. The patients were randomized into two groups. In one group (preparation group) 66 elective patients were selected from the outpatient department; the bowel was prepared using Fortran’s solution. In the second group (non-preparation group), 64 patients were selected from the emergency and outpatient departments, no bowel preparation was used. Colostomy was omitted in both groups. The main outcomes regarding operative time, hospital stay, rate of postoperative wound infection, anastomotic leak and intra-abdominal abscess were compared between the two groups. Results: Malignancy was the most prevalent pathology in both the preparation and non-preparation groups, 75.7% and 62.5% respectively, while benign diseases were present in up to 24.2% of the preparation group and in 1.5% of the non-preparation group. Anastomosis was ileo-colic in 33.3% and 37.5%, colo-colic or colo-rectal in 66.6% and 62.5% of the preparation and non-preparation groups respectively. There was no significant statistical difference in the overall postoperative complication rates between the two groups, 16.6% in the preparation group and 14% in the non-preparation group. Postoperative wound infection, wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal abscess and anastomotic leak occurred in 9.09%, 1.5%, 1.5% and 4.5% in the preparation group, as compared to 7.8%, 3.1%, 0% and 3.1% in the non-preparation group respectively. The mortality rate was nil in both groups. Conclusion: Resection of colorectal pathology followed by primary anastomosis, without stoma, can be performed safely with the omission of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation.
一期结直肠吻合术,无需准备,无需造口
背景:长期以来,机械肠道准备一直被认为是结肠手术成功的重要先决条件;这一点现在正受到质疑。肠准备的不良影响,以及在紧急情况下结肠吻合术的安全性,导致手术方案发生了相当大的变化,使得结肠切除后无需肠准备的初级修复和吻合术更加安全,结肠造口的作用从强制性变为可选性。目的:评估在没有机械肠道准备或结肠造口的情况下是否可以安全地进行结肠手术。方法:对在约旦安曼Al Bashir教学医院接受择期和紧急结直肠手术的130例患者进行为期三年的前瞻性随访。患者随机分为两组。一组(预备组)门诊择期患者66例;用Fortran溶液制备肠道。第二组(非准备组)选择急诊和门诊64例患者,未使用肠道准备。两组均未行结肠造口术。比较两组手术时间、住院时间、术后伤口感染发生率、吻合口瘘发生率、腹内脓肿发生率。结果:制剂组和非制剂组均以恶性病变为主,分别占75.7%和62.5%,而制剂组和非制剂组的良性病变分别占24.2%和1.5%。预备组和非预备组的回肠-结肠吻合率分别为33.3%和37.5%,结肠-结肠或结肠-直肠吻合率分别为66.6%和62.5%。两组术后总并发症发生率差异无统计学意义,预备组为16.6%,非预备组为14%。术后创面感染、创面裂开、腹内脓肿、吻合口漏发生率分别为9.09%、1.5%、1.5%、4.5%,而非准备组分别为7.8%、3.1%、0%、3.1%。两组的死亡率均为零。结论:切除结直肠病理后进行一期吻合,无需造口,可在术前省去机械肠准备的情况下安全进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信