Phillips Curve Estimation During Tranquil and Recessionary Periods: Evidence From Panel Analysis

IF 0.2 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yhlas Sovbetov
{"title":"Phillips Curve Estimation During Tranquil and Recessionary Periods: Evidence From Panel Analysis","authors":"Yhlas Sovbetov","doi":"10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The empirical literature that covers Phillips Curve analysis during recessionary periods is notably scant. The Great Recession has rekindled a debate on the validity and stability of the Phillips Curve which is still ongoing. The basis for this debate is the observation that real activity dropped sharply without causing a drop in inflation. This paper carries out an empirical analysis for the classical expectation-augmented Phillips curve model across 41 countries from1980-2016 by distinguishing tranquil and recessionary periods separately. Based on the results of the research, the paper finds that dynamics of Phillips Curve changes during recessionary periods and the empirical relationship becomes no longer valid. These findings support the ongoing debate about the missing disinflation and collapse of the Phillips curve, but only during the recessionary periods. In the case of tranquil periods, the empirical relationship still seems to be valid. Moreover, the paper also observes that both backward-looking and forward-looking fractions of inflation gain weight and significance during recessionary periods. However, the paper remains indecisive about which exact fraction gains more weight and significance as the panel model does not incorporate these two fractions of inflation in a single hybrid framework simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":33072,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi","volume":"69 1","pages":"23-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The empirical literature that covers Phillips Curve analysis during recessionary periods is notably scant. The Great Recession has rekindled a debate on the validity and stability of the Phillips Curve which is still ongoing. The basis for this debate is the observation that real activity dropped sharply without causing a drop in inflation. This paper carries out an empirical analysis for the classical expectation-augmented Phillips curve model across 41 countries from1980-2016 by distinguishing tranquil and recessionary periods separately. Based on the results of the research, the paper finds that dynamics of Phillips Curve changes during recessionary periods and the empirical relationship becomes no longer valid. These findings support the ongoing debate about the missing disinflation and collapse of the Phillips curve, but only during the recessionary periods. In the case of tranquil periods, the empirical relationship still seems to be valid. Moreover, the paper also observes that both backward-looking and forward-looking fractions of inflation gain weight and significance during recessionary periods. However, the paper remains indecisive about which exact fraction gains more weight and significance as the panel model does not incorporate these two fractions of inflation in a single hybrid framework simultaneously.
平稳和衰退时期的菲利普斯曲线估计:来自面板分析的证据
在经济衰退时期,涵盖菲利普斯曲线分析的实证文献明显不足。大衰退重新点燃了一场关于菲利普斯曲线有效性和稳定性的辩论,这场辩论仍在继续。这场辩论的基础是,人们观察到,实际经济活动大幅下降,却没有导致通胀下降。本文对经典的期望增强菲利普斯曲线模型在1980-2016年间的41个国家进行了实证分析,并分别区分了平稳期和衰退期。研究结果表明,在经济衰退时期,菲利普斯曲线的动态会发生变化,经验关系不再有效。这些发现支持了正在进行的关于未出现的反通货膨胀和菲利普斯曲线崩溃的争论,但仅在衰退时期。在平静时期的情况下,经验关系似乎仍然有效。此外,本文还观察到,在经济衰退时期,通胀的回顾和前瞻性部分都增加了权重和重要性。然而,由于面板模型没有同时在一个混合框架中纳入通货膨胀的这两个部分,因此本文仍然没有确定哪个确切的部分获得更大的权重和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信