Comparing the Measured and Latent Dark Triad: Are Three Measures Better than One?

P. Jonason, Phillip S. Kavanagh, Gregory D. Webster, Debra Fitzgerald
{"title":"Comparing the Measured and Latent Dark Triad: Are Three Measures Better than One?","authors":"P. Jonason, Phillip S. Kavanagh, Gregory D. Webster, Debra Fitzgerald","doi":"10.2458/JMM.V2I1.12363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Could measurement level be a factor worth considering when studying the Dark Triad (i.e., narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism)? In two studies (N = 465), we compared the relative fit of two Dark Triad models: one that treats the three measures as separate-yet-related personality traits and another that treats the measures as tapping a single, latent construct. Mid-level personality traits, such as mate-retention strategies (Study 1) were best explained by a three-measure model, whereas the higher-order trait of sociosexuality (Study 2), were best explained by a single, latent-factor model. When considering mid-level measurement in personality, the three traits may provide independent effects for interpersonal relationships, whereas at the higher-order level, the three traits may function as a single entity relating to other higher-order traits. We suggest one should consider level of measurement between the predictor and criterion variables to better predict correlations among variables such as the Dark Triad.","PeriodicalId":90602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of methods and measurement in the social sciences","volume":"2 1","pages":"28-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of methods and measurement in the social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/JMM.V2I1.12363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Could measurement level be a factor worth considering when studying the Dark Triad (i.e., narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism)? In two studies (N = 465), we compared the relative fit of two Dark Triad models: one that treats the three measures as separate-yet-related personality traits and another that treats the measures as tapping a single, latent construct. Mid-level personality traits, such as mate-retention strategies (Study 1) were best explained by a three-measure model, whereas the higher-order trait of sociosexuality (Study 2), were best explained by a single, latent-factor model. When considering mid-level measurement in personality, the three traits may provide independent effects for interpersonal relationships, whereas at the higher-order level, the three traits may function as a single entity relating to other higher-order traits. We suggest one should consider level of measurement between the predictor and criterion variables to better predict correlations among variables such as the Dark Triad.
测量和潜在暗三联征的比较:三个测量比一个好吗?
在研究黑暗三位一体(即自恋、精神病和马基雅维利主义)时,测量水平是否值得考虑?在两项研究(N = 465)中,我们比较了两种黑暗三合一模型的相对拟合度:一种将这三种测量方法视为独立但相关的人格特征,另一种将这三种测量方法视为挖掘单一的潜在结构。中等水平的人格特征,如配偶保留策略(研究1)最好用三测量模型来解释,而高阶的社会性特征(研究2)最好用单一的潜在因素模型来解释。在人格的中层测量中,这三种特质可能对人际关系产生独立的影响,而在高阶水平上,这三种特质可能作为一个整体与其他高阶特质相关。我们建议应该考虑预测变量和标准变量之间的测量水平,以更好地预测变量之间的相关性,如黑暗三合一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信