Analysis of the Mathematics Questions in 2021 High School Entrance Exam According to Learning Areas and the MATH Taxonomy

Feyza Ali̇ustaoğlu, Irfan Dagdelen, Güler Tuluk
{"title":"Analysis of the Mathematics Questions in 2021 High School Entrance Exam According to Learning Areas and the MATH Taxonomy","authors":"Feyza Ali̇ustaoğlu, Irfan Dagdelen, Güler Tuluk","doi":"10.24106/kefdergi.1243321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design/Methodology/Approach: Learning areas were coded as “learning area” and “linked learning area.” In the context of cognitive processes, the exam questions were classified according to the groups and categories of the MATH Taxonomy developed specifically for mathematics. The research was designed as document analysis, one of the qualitative research designs. \nFindings: It was found that the questions in 2021 LGS were taken from all learning areas of secondary school mathematics and the numbers of questions were compatible with the learning areas in the curriculum. It was seen that many questions addressed more than one learning area, and the learning areas were related to each other. When the questions in 2021 LGS were examined in the context of cognitive processes according to the MATH taxonomy, it was found that there were questions from the groups B and C, mostly C, and no questions from the group A. The questions in 2018, 2019, and 2021 LGS were also compared in this study. It was found that the learning areas generally had a similar distribution, and when compared in terms of MATH taxonomy; as the years progressed, the level of the questions increased. \nHighlights: The use of MATH Taxonomy, which was developed specifically for mathematics, has an important role in examining mathematics questions according to cognitive processes. It was observed that the questions were not directed to a single learning area, and that the learning areas were related to each other. It is thought that coding in the form of learning area-linked learning area is important.","PeriodicalId":33167,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1243321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design/Methodology/Approach: Learning areas were coded as “learning area” and “linked learning area.” In the context of cognitive processes, the exam questions were classified according to the groups and categories of the MATH Taxonomy developed specifically for mathematics. The research was designed as document analysis, one of the qualitative research designs. Findings: It was found that the questions in 2021 LGS were taken from all learning areas of secondary school mathematics and the numbers of questions were compatible with the learning areas in the curriculum. It was seen that many questions addressed more than one learning area, and the learning areas were related to each other. When the questions in 2021 LGS were examined in the context of cognitive processes according to the MATH taxonomy, it was found that there were questions from the groups B and C, mostly C, and no questions from the group A. The questions in 2018, 2019, and 2021 LGS were also compared in this study. It was found that the learning areas generally had a similar distribution, and when compared in terms of MATH taxonomy; as the years progressed, the level of the questions increased. Highlights: The use of MATH Taxonomy, which was developed specifically for mathematics, has an important role in examining mathematics questions according to cognitive processes. It was observed that the questions were not directed to a single learning area, and that the learning areas were related to each other. It is thought that coding in the form of learning area-linked learning area is important.
根据学习领域和数学分类分析2021年中考数学试题
设计/方法论/方法:学习区域被编码为“学习区域”和“关联学习区域”。在认知过程的背景下,根据专门为数学开发的数学分类法的组和类别对考试问题进行分类。本研究采用定性研究设计之一的文献分析。研究发现:2021年LGS的问题来自中学数学的所有学习领域,问题的数量与课程中的学习领域相匹配。我们可以看到,许多问题涉及多个学习领域,并且这些学习领域是相互关联的。在认知过程的背景下,根据MATH分类对2021年LGS的问题进行检查,发现B组和C组的问题大部分来自C组,没有a组的问题。本研究还比较了2018年、2019年和2021年LGS的问题。结果表明,在数学分类方面,学习区域的分布基本相似;随着时间的推移,问题的水平也在提高。重点:数学分类法的使用是专门为数学开发的,在根据认知过程检查数学问题方面具有重要作用。据观察,这些问题不是针对单一的学习领域,而且这些学习领域是相互关联的。研究认为,学习区与学习区相联系的编码形式是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书