The Effect of Writing for Learning and Model-Based Learning Activities on Success and Permanence in the Fourth Grade Simple Electrical Circuits Unit

Bünyamin İspi̇r, A. Yıldız
{"title":"The Effect of Writing for Learning and Model-Based Learning Activities on Success and Permanence in the Fourth Grade Simple Electrical Circuits Unit","authors":"Bünyamin İspi̇r, A. Yıldız","doi":"10.24106/kefdergi.1195568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of writing for learning and model-based learning activities on academic achievement in the \"Simple Electrical Circuits\" unit of the fourth-grade science course and the views of students and classroom teachers about these activities. In the quantitative part of the research, which has quantitative and qualitative designs, quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group and in the qualitative part, student and teacher opinion forms consisting of open-ended questions were used. Three experimental and one control group were selected among the fourth graders according to the simple random sampling method. The achievement test related to the \"Simple Electrical Circuits\" unit was applied to these groups as a pre-test, post-test and permanence test. In the study, writing for learning purposes in a randomly selected group, model-based learning in the other, and both writing for learning and model-based learning activities were carried out together in the third group. In the control group, the lessons were carried out according to the current method. ANOVA was used in the analysis of quantitative data, and content analysis was used in the analysis of qualitative data. Findings related to the post-test of the experimental groups and the control group showed a significant difference in favor of the experimental group students who performed the model-based learning activities. According to the permanence test, there was no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups and the control group, but the mean of the experimental groups was higher than the mean of the control group. According to the data obtained from the interviews with students and teachers, it can be stated that students and teachers exhibited a positive approach towards writing for learning and model-based learning activities. In addition, the experimental group students stated that they did the activities with fun, while the teachers stated that they believed in the benefits of the activities used, but it was difficult to implement them in the current system. Based on these results, new research can be carried out at the third-grade level, in different lessons or in different units of the same lesson.","PeriodicalId":33167,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1195568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of writing for learning and model-based learning activities on academic achievement in the "Simple Electrical Circuits" unit of the fourth-grade science course and the views of students and classroom teachers about these activities. In the quantitative part of the research, which has quantitative and qualitative designs, quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group and in the qualitative part, student and teacher opinion forms consisting of open-ended questions were used. Three experimental and one control group were selected among the fourth graders according to the simple random sampling method. The achievement test related to the "Simple Electrical Circuits" unit was applied to these groups as a pre-test, post-test and permanence test. In the study, writing for learning purposes in a randomly selected group, model-based learning in the other, and both writing for learning and model-based learning activities were carried out together in the third group. In the control group, the lessons were carried out according to the current method. ANOVA was used in the analysis of quantitative data, and content analysis was used in the analysis of qualitative data. Findings related to the post-test of the experimental groups and the control group showed a significant difference in favor of the experimental group students who performed the model-based learning activities. According to the permanence test, there was no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups and the control group, but the mean of the experimental groups was higher than the mean of the control group. According to the data obtained from the interviews with students and teachers, it can be stated that students and teachers exhibited a positive approach towards writing for learning and model-based learning activities. In addition, the experimental group students stated that they did the activities with fun, while the teachers stated that they believed in the benefits of the activities used, but it was difficult to implement them in the current system. Based on these results, new research can be carried out at the third-grade level, in different lessons or in different units of the same lesson.
四年级简易电路单元学习写作与模式学习活动对成功与持久的影响
摘要本研究旨在探讨四年级理科课程“简单电路”单元的学习写作与模式学习活动对学业成绩的影响,以及学生与任课教师对这些活动的看法。本研究的定量部分采用定量和定性设计,采用准实验设计,采用前测后测控制组,定性部分采用开放式问题构成的学生意见表和教师意见表。采用简单随机抽样的方法,在四年级学生中选择3个实验组和1个对照组。“简单电路”单元相关的成就测试作为前测、后测和持久性测试应用于这些组。在本研究中,随机选择一组为学习目的写作,另一组为基于模型的学习,第三组为学习目的写作和基于模型的学习活动同时进行。对照组按现行教学方法进行教学。定量资料分析采用方差分析,定性资料分析采用内容分析。实验组和对照组的后测结果显示,实验组学生在进行基于模型的学习活动时表现出显著的优势。经持久性检验,实验组与对照组比较差异无统计学意义,但实验组的平均值高于对照组的平均值。根据对学生和教师的访谈数据,可以看出,学生和教师对学习写作和基于模型的学习活动表现出积极的态度。此外,实验组的学生表示,他们做的活动很有趣,而老师表示,他们相信所使用的活动的好处,但很难在目前的制度下实施。基于这些结果,可以在三年级阶段,在不同的课程或同一课程的不同单元中进行新的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书