Environmental pollution and the development of congenital heart disease: A scoping review

D. Ngwezi, L. Hornberger, Álvaro R. Osornio-Vargas
{"title":"Environmental pollution and the development of congenital heart disease: A scoping review","authors":"D. Ngwezi, L. Hornberger, Álvaro R. Osornio-Vargas","doi":"10.24105/APR.2018.5.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly in infancy affecting 1% of all live births worldwide of which the etiology in most affected children is unknown. The role of environmental pollutants from various sources is increasingly gaining attention. To explore the existing breadth of knowledge on this topic, we undertook a scoping review of studies examining the role of environmental pollution in relation to the development of CHD. Methods: We searched various databases for studies reporting CHD and exposures to chemicals using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non-MeSH including criteria pollutants (e.g. CO, SO2 NO2), occupational, non-occupational, industrial chemicals and emissions reported in pollutant release and transfer registries (PRTR) from 1980 to 2018. Results: We identified 70 studies that were grouped into the categories of outdoor industrial chemical pollution; urban air pollution; occupational; and non-occupational exposures. There were no marked differences in proportions of studies in the first three categories, which ranged between 29-33%. Non-occupational exposures accounted for 7% of the studies. Proximity to industrial facilities and hazardous waste sites was associated with CHD in a modest number of studies that used PRTR. Urban criteria pollutants were consistently associated with CHD. Maternal occupational exposures were more commonly studied compared to paternal exposures and organic solvents were associated with CHD in these studies. There were limited studies that examined non-occupational and multipollutant exposures. Conclusion: We identified associations between various chemicals and CHD, employing diverse methods of exposure assessment. Most studies examined single pollutant exposures and have demonstrated inconclusive findings. Future studies should examine multiple pollutant exposures and CHD. In addition to monitored data, exploratory studies could exploit PRTR in countries where such registries exist. Furthermore, multicenter studies that examine larger populations of affected patients could facilitate the discovery of the relationship between specific chemicals and CHD subtypes.","PeriodicalId":72104,"journal":{"name":"Advances in pediatric research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in pediatric research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24105/APR.2018.5.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly in infancy affecting 1% of all live births worldwide of which the etiology in most affected children is unknown. The role of environmental pollutants from various sources is increasingly gaining attention. To explore the existing breadth of knowledge on this topic, we undertook a scoping review of studies examining the role of environmental pollution in relation to the development of CHD. Methods: We searched various databases for studies reporting CHD and exposures to chemicals using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non-MeSH including criteria pollutants (e.g. CO, SO2 NO2), occupational, non-occupational, industrial chemicals and emissions reported in pollutant release and transfer registries (PRTR) from 1980 to 2018. Results: We identified 70 studies that were grouped into the categories of outdoor industrial chemical pollution; urban air pollution; occupational; and non-occupational exposures. There were no marked differences in proportions of studies in the first three categories, which ranged between 29-33%. Non-occupational exposures accounted for 7% of the studies. Proximity to industrial facilities and hazardous waste sites was associated with CHD in a modest number of studies that used PRTR. Urban criteria pollutants were consistently associated with CHD. Maternal occupational exposures were more commonly studied compared to paternal exposures and organic solvents were associated with CHD in these studies. There were limited studies that examined non-occupational and multipollutant exposures. Conclusion: We identified associations between various chemicals and CHD, employing diverse methods of exposure assessment. Most studies examined single pollutant exposures and have demonstrated inconclusive findings. Future studies should examine multiple pollutant exposures and CHD. In addition to monitored data, exploratory studies could exploit PRTR in countries where such registries exist. Furthermore, multicenter studies that examine larger populations of affected patients could facilitate the discovery of the relationship between specific chemicals and CHD subtypes.
环境污染与先天性心脏病的发展:范围综述
先天性心脏病(CHD)是婴儿期最常见的先天性异常,占全世界所有活产婴儿的1%,其中大多数患儿的病因尚不清楚。各种来源的环境污染物的作用越来越受到人们的关注。为了探讨这方面的知识,我们对有关环境污染在冠心病发展中的作用的研究进行了范围审查。方法:我们检索了各种数据库,使用医学主题目(MeSH)和非MeSH检索报告冠心病和化学品暴露的研究,包括1980年至2018年污染物释放和转移登记(PRTR)中报告的标准污染物(如CO, SO2 NO2),职业,非职业,工业化学品和排放。结果:我们确定了70项研究,这些研究被归为户外工业化学污染的类别;城市空气污染;职业;以及非职业暴露。前三类研究的比例无显著差异,在29-33%之间。非职业暴露占研究的7%。在少数使用PRTR的研究中,靠近工业设施和危险废物场所与冠心病有关。城市标准污染物始终与冠心病相关。与父亲接触相比,母亲的职业接触更常被研究,有机溶剂在这些研究中与冠心病有关。关于非职业和多重污染物暴露的研究有限。结论:我们采用不同的暴露评估方法,确定了各种化学物质与冠心病之间的联系。大多数研究检查了单一污染物暴露,并证明了不确定的结果。未来的研究应探讨多重污染物暴露与冠心病的关系。除了监测的数据外,探索性研究还可以在有这种登记的国家利用PRTR。此外,多中心研究检查更大人群的受影响患者可能有助于发现特定化学物质与冠心病亚型之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信