Realm Buster: Stan Brakhage

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY REVIEWS
CHICAGO REVIEW Pub Date : 2001-12-22 DOI:10.2307/25304814
M. Mcclure, Stephen Anker
{"title":"Realm Buster: Stan Brakhage","authors":"M. Mcclure, Stephen Anker","doi":"10.2307/25304814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MICHAEL McCLURE: Stan is a realm buster, and I use \"realm\" as the word is used in Biology and in Zen. Stan uses his energy and it's almost like moving his shoulders powerfully to break the walls between realms. Some of these realms are the concept of painting, the idea of poetry, the meaning of music, what portrait is, what personal physiology is; other realms that Stan opens up are human and other biology, also the nervous system, ideation--how things are conceived; and then there's the separation between hearing and seeing, sound and silence, and music and sound, which are all explored and more or less brought into one shape in his work. When enough realms are opened, the walls between them torn down or ignored away, then consciousness and concrete experience become one sizeless event in the sizeless event of the Taoist uncarved block which is either the universe or the body, as you see it. Stan likes to say that he was frustrated in his early desire to be a poet and that his hundreds of hours of film are closer to music than to poetry. I can appreciate that, especially in terms of Messiaen or Vivaldi. I also hear his delight in Madrigals, as much as other music. But Stan derives some of the organicity of his huge body of work from the style and thoughts of some liberated poets of today. I'm thinking of the works of Robert Duncan, as they branch like rivers and streams, one from another, lighting the dark of the night or lighting the dark of the body and mind. There's also the sizeless willingness of Charles Olson's spirit in Stan's films--Olson's willingness to let things break, to let things fall down and go boom, and to trust that they will all land on all fours. Further, there's the sheer trusting experimentality of Gertrude Stein in Stan's work and there's Stan's love of the wry, aesthetic wit and intellective delicacy of Louis Zukofsky. I first met Stan in 1954, at which point he has described himself as being \"the houseboy of Robert Duncan and Jess Collins,\" meaning by that that he helped them fix meals, do dishes, and slept in the flat below their place. I had just begun to know Robert Duncan and less Collins through Robert's first poetry workshop at San Francisco State, which included myself and Helen Adam, a balladeer of the strange and haunted, who was in her girlhood in Scotland called the Fairy Poet. On what was perhaps my first visit to Robert and Jess's San Francisco fiat in 1954, Stan came upstairs to visit. My impression was that Stan was inhabiting the floor below Robert and Jess, which was the housing, as I understood it, for the Centaur Press of Kermit Sheets and James Broughton. Stan is the same age as I am, within a few months, and also as I am, Kansas born. When I saw his huge head with dark, tousled hair and intense eyes that were simultaneously focused and staring, I recognized a kindred spirit. I saw Stan visiting Duncan's lectures at the workshop he was teaching on a number of occasions. Stan was absorbing the energetic principles of the concept of field from Olson via Duncan, and he was taking in the intensely biological shaping-ideas of Robert Duncan and the beautiful, unique concepts of collage of less Collins. Stan was a young man who was sui generis and coming up as a member of an artist foster family of sui generis individuals. Stan's myriad-mindedness is both on the surface and below the surface. Surface-wise, Stan is myriad minded in the art of film, and so busy freeing realms from walls between them, that it's impossible to keep up with him. On the less visible field he is tirelessly investigating not only the arts and history with a voracious love for them, but he's also digging through realms of science--particularly the biology of seeing and the neuro-chemical anatomy of the nervous system. Stan agrees with Thoreau that, \"One must stand up to live before one sits down to write,\" or to edit film for that matter. And Stan stands up not only with his travels and his varied adventures and family mountain life and film, but also with the large scale of his passions, his happinesses, his pleasures, his modesties. …","PeriodicalId":42508,"journal":{"name":"CHICAGO REVIEW","volume":"47 1","pages":"171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/25304814","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHICAGO REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/25304814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

MICHAEL McCLURE: Stan is a realm buster, and I use "realm" as the word is used in Biology and in Zen. Stan uses his energy and it's almost like moving his shoulders powerfully to break the walls between realms. Some of these realms are the concept of painting, the idea of poetry, the meaning of music, what portrait is, what personal physiology is; other realms that Stan opens up are human and other biology, also the nervous system, ideation--how things are conceived; and then there's the separation between hearing and seeing, sound and silence, and music and sound, which are all explored and more or less brought into one shape in his work. When enough realms are opened, the walls between them torn down or ignored away, then consciousness and concrete experience become one sizeless event in the sizeless event of the Taoist uncarved block which is either the universe or the body, as you see it. Stan likes to say that he was frustrated in his early desire to be a poet and that his hundreds of hours of film are closer to music than to poetry. I can appreciate that, especially in terms of Messiaen or Vivaldi. I also hear his delight in Madrigals, as much as other music. But Stan derives some of the organicity of his huge body of work from the style and thoughts of some liberated poets of today. I'm thinking of the works of Robert Duncan, as they branch like rivers and streams, one from another, lighting the dark of the night or lighting the dark of the body and mind. There's also the sizeless willingness of Charles Olson's spirit in Stan's films--Olson's willingness to let things break, to let things fall down and go boom, and to trust that they will all land on all fours. Further, there's the sheer trusting experimentality of Gertrude Stein in Stan's work and there's Stan's love of the wry, aesthetic wit and intellective delicacy of Louis Zukofsky. I first met Stan in 1954, at which point he has described himself as being "the houseboy of Robert Duncan and Jess Collins," meaning by that that he helped them fix meals, do dishes, and slept in the flat below their place. I had just begun to know Robert Duncan and less Collins through Robert's first poetry workshop at San Francisco State, which included myself and Helen Adam, a balladeer of the strange and haunted, who was in her girlhood in Scotland called the Fairy Poet. On what was perhaps my first visit to Robert and Jess's San Francisco fiat in 1954, Stan came upstairs to visit. My impression was that Stan was inhabiting the floor below Robert and Jess, which was the housing, as I understood it, for the Centaur Press of Kermit Sheets and James Broughton. Stan is the same age as I am, within a few months, and also as I am, Kansas born. When I saw his huge head with dark, tousled hair and intense eyes that were simultaneously focused and staring, I recognized a kindred spirit. I saw Stan visiting Duncan's lectures at the workshop he was teaching on a number of occasions. Stan was absorbing the energetic principles of the concept of field from Olson via Duncan, and he was taking in the intensely biological shaping-ideas of Robert Duncan and the beautiful, unique concepts of collage of less Collins. Stan was a young man who was sui generis and coming up as a member of an artist foster family of sui generis individuals. Stan's myriad-mindedness is both on the surface and below the surface. Surface-wise, Stan is myriad minded in the art of film, and so busy freeing realms from walls between them, that it's impossible to keep up with him. On the less visible field he is tirelessly investigating not only the arts and history with a voracious love for them, but he's also digging through realms of science--particularly the biology of seeing and the neuro-chemical anatomy of the nervous system. Stan agrees with Thoreau that, "One must stand up to live before one sits down to write," or to edit film for that matter. And Stan stands up not only with his travels and his varied adventures and family mountain life and film, but also with the large scale of his passions, his happinesses, his pleasures, his modesties. …
Realm Buster:Stan Brakhage
迈克尔·麦克卢尔:斯坦是一个领域破坏者,我使用“领域”这个词,就像在生物学和禅宗中使用的一样。斯坦用他的能量,几乎就像有力地移动他的肩膀来打破领域之间的墙。这些领域包括绘画的概念,诗歌的概念,音乐的意义,肖像是什么,个人生理是什么;斯坦打开的其他领域是人类和其他生物,还有神经系统、思维——事物是如何被构想出来的;然后是听觉与视觉,声音与寂静,音乐与声音的分离,这些都在他的作品中进行了探索,并或多或少地形成了一种形式。当足够多的领域被打开,它们之间的墙被拆除或被忽略,然后意识和具体的经验成为一个没有大小的事件,在道家没有雕琢的块中,这个块要么是宇宙,要么是你所看到的身体。斯坦喜欢说,他早年想成为诗人的愿望受挫了,他那数百小时的电影更接近音乐,而不是诗歌。我很欣赏这一点,尤其是在梅西安和维瓦尔第的作品中。我在牧歌中也听到了他的喜悦,就像其他音乐一样。但斯坦从当今一些解放诗人的风格和思想中汲取了他大量作品的一些有机成分。我在想罗伯特·邓肯的作品,它们像河流和小溪一样,一条接一条地分叉,照亮夜晚的黑暗,也照亮身体和心灵的黑暗。在斯坦的电影中,也有查尔斯·奥尔森(Charles Olson)精神的无限意愿——奥尔森愿意让事物破裂,让事物倒下,让事物爆炸,并相信它们都会安然无恙。此外,斯坦的作品中有格特鲁德·斯坦那种纯粹的信任实验,还有斯坦对路易斯·祖可夫斯基那种讽刺、美学上的机智和智慧细腻的热爱。我第一次见到斯坦是在1954年,当时他形容自己是“罗伯特·邓肯和杰斯·柯林斯的男仆”,意思是他帮他们做饭、洗碗,睡在他们家楼下的公寓里。我是通过罗伯特在旧金山州立大学举办的第一个诗歌研讨会才开始了解罗伯特·邓肯,而不是柯林斯的。参加这个研讨会的有我和海伦·亚当,她是一个古怪而又困扰的民谣歌手,少女时代住在苏格兰,名叫“仙女诗人”。1954年,也许是我第一次去罗伯特和杰西在旧金山的菲亚特,斯坦上楼来看我。我的印象是斯坦住在罗伯特和杰西楼下,据我所知,那是克米特床单和詹姆斯·布劳顿的半人马出版社的所在地。斯坦和我一样大,不到几个月,也和我一样,出生在堪萨斯。当我看到他那一头乱蓬蓬的黑发的大脑袋,同时盯着我的眼睛时,我认出了他是一个志趣相投的人。我看到斯坦在邓肯的研讨会上多次去听他的讲座。斯坦通过邓肯从奥尔森那里吸收了场概念的能量原理,他还吸收了罗伯特·邓肯强烈的生物塑造思想,以及less Collins美丽而独特的拼贴概念。斯坦是一个很有个性的年轻人,成长于一个有个性的艺术家寄养家庭。斯坦的多面手既有表面上的,也有表面下的。表面上看,斯坦对电影艺术有着千奇百怪的想法,他忙于从他们之间的墙壁中解放领域,以至于不可能跟上他的步伐。在不太可见的领域,他不仅孜孜不倦地研究艺术和历史,而且对它们有着贪婪的热爱,他还钻研科学领域——尤其是视觉生物学和神经系统的神经化学解剖学。斯坦同意梭罗的观点,“一个人在坐下来写作之前,必须站起来生活”,或者为此编辑电影。斯坦不仅因为他的旅行、他的各种冒险经历、他的家庭山地生活和电影而站起来,而且因为他的激情、他的幸福、他的快乐、他的谦虚而站起来。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHICAGO REVIEW
CHICAGO REVIEW LITERARY REVIEWS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: In the back issues room down the hall from Chicago Review’s offices on the third floor of Lillie House sit hundreds of unread magazines, yearning to see the light of day. These historic issues from the Chicago Review archives may now be ordered online with a credit card (via CCNow). Some of them are groundbreaking anthologies, others outstanding general issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信