Nootropic drugs for correction of cognitive functions through the focus of evidence-based medicine (literature review)

{"title":"Nootropic drugs for correction of cognitive functions through the focus of evidence-based medicine (literature review)","authors":"","doi":"10.26565/2312-5675-2021-16-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. In today's world, the first cause of death is pathology of the cardiovascular system. Vascular disease is influenced by many factors: lack of sleep, physical inertia, poorly balanced diet, obesity, heart disease. The fast pace of life forces a person to be in permanent stress, so as not to miss anything and have time for all the goals. This is why there is a demand for excipients and substances that could improve the peak of human cognitive abilities, maintain psychological stability. Today, the pharmaceutical market offers drugs that, according to pharmaceutical marketers, have solutions to the problems outlined above. These substances are classified to group of nootropic drugs (racetams). Objective. Review of high quality research on the effectiveness of nootropic drugs. Materials and methods. The literature review was performed using such scientometric databases as: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, Ingecta, Web of Science, UpToDate. The review included studies of randomized trials, placebo-controlled randomized trials, meta-analyzes, and systematic reviews. Data meet criteria A and B of evidence-based medicine. In the absence of high quality studies, studies with a lower level of evidence were selected. The search was made by topics: improving of cognitive functions, improving ability to work, improving sleep, improving mood, treatment of mental and psychiatric pathologies (Alzheimer's disease, dementia with various etiologies, depression), application in pediatrics. Results. The literature review included more than 40 high quality studies, but no conclusive evidence was found on the effectiveness of any drug. Conclusions. Data on the undeniable efficacy in relation to the cognitive functions of any of these nootropic drugs were not found in any study. In the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, some (Cerebrolysin, Nicergoline) drugs show controversial results of efficacy and safety. They require continued clinical research and they need to be approved by the FDA.","PeriodicalId":33688,"journal":{"name":"Psikhiatriia nevrologiia ta medichna psikhologiia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikhiatriia nevrologiia ta medichna psikhologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-5675-2021-16-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. In today's world, the first cause of death is pathology of the cardiovascular system. Vascular disease is influenced by many factors: lack of sleep, physical inertia, poorly balanced diet, obesity, heart disease. The fast pace of life forces a person to be in permanent stress, so as not to miss anything and have time for all the goals. This is why there is a demand for excipients and substances that could improve the peak of human cognitive abilities, maintain psychological stability. Today, the pharmaceutical market offers drugs that, according to pharmaceutical marketers, have solutions to the problems outlined above. These substances are classified to group of nootropic drugs (racetams). Objective. Review of high quality research on the effectiveness of nootropic drugs. Materials and methods. The literature review was performed using such scientometric databases as: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, Ingecta, Web of Science, UpToDate. The review included studies of randomized trials, placebo-controlled randomized trials, meta-analyzes, and systematic reviews. Data meet criteria A and B of evidence-based medicine. In the absence of high quality studies, studies with a lower level of evidence were selected. The search was made by topics: improving of cognitive functions, improving ability to work, improving sleep, improving mood, treatment of mental and psychiatric pathologies (Alzheimer's disease, dementia with various etiologies, depression), application in pediatrics. Results. The literature review included more than 40 high quality studies, but no conclusive evidence was found on the effectiveness of any drug. Conclusions. Data on the undeniable efficacy in relation to the cognitive functions of any of these nootropic drugs were not found in any study. In the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, some (Cerebrolysin, Nicergoline) drugs show controversial results of efficacy and safety. They require continued clinical research and they need to be approved by the FDA.
益智药物对认知功能矫正的循证医学重点(文献综述)
的相关性。在当今世界,死亡的首要原因是心血管系统的病理。影响血管疾病的因素很多:睡眠不足、身体惰性、饮食不均衡、肥胖、心脏病。快节奏的生活迫使一个人永远处于压力之中,这样才不会错过任何事情,才有时间实现所有的目标。这就是为什么对能提高人类认知能力巅峰、保持心理稳定的辅料和物质有需求的原因。今天,药品市场提供的药品,根据药品营销人员,有解决上述问题的办法。这些物质被归为益智药(拉西坦)一类。益智药物有效性的高质量研究综述。材料和方法。文献综述使用如下科学计量数据库:PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、BMJ循证医学、Ingecta、Web of Science、UpToDate。该综述包括随机试验、安慰剂对照随机试验、元分析和系统综述的研究。数据符合循证医学标准A和B。在缺乏高质量研究的情况下,选择了证据水平较低的研究。搜索的主题是:改善认知功能,提高工作能力,改善睡眠,改善情绪,治疗精神和精神疾病(阿尔茨海默病,各种病因的痴呆,抑郁症),在儿科的应用。结果。文献综述包括40多个高质量的研究,但没有发现任何药物有效性的确凿证据。在任何研究中都没有发现任何这些益智药物与认知功能有关的不可否认的功效的数据。在阿尔茨海默病的治疗中,一些药物(脑溶血素、尼麦角林)的疗效和安全性存在争议。它们需要持续的临床研究,并且需要得到FDA的批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信