{"title":"DIAGNOSTICS METHOD OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS BETWEEN THE CURATOR AND STUDENTS","authors":"","doi":"10.26565/2225-7756-2020-68-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The method of diagnosing interpersonal interactions of curators and students is designed to study the perception of curators and students in the academic group about themselves and the curator, as well as to study the relationship between curators and students of the group. The method determines the type of attitude to the curator in self-assessment and mutual assessment. The technique is constructed according to the type of Likert scale. The statements in the form of small crafts in Ukrainian folklore are selected for evaluation - proverbs and sayings, which in content are the quintessence of folk ideas about human relations, and in form - concise and easy to understand. In addition, a statement in \"metaphorical\" form is subjectively easier to evaluate than a direct answer. There are variables that determine the type of attitude to the curator: \"Understanding and democracy\"; \"One step ahead: attentiveness and foresight\", \"Efficiency, teamwork efficiency\". These characteristics reflect various aspects of interpersonal interaction in the academic group, where the curator may pay attention to each of the participants in the educational process, and may be careless and biased; can organize team activities, express their ideas and wishes; predict the likelihood of problematic, conflict situations and manage the process of their resolution, and may, conversely, be passive, inactive, critical of social phenomena and others, provoke conflicts and misunderstandings. The interpersonal interaction of the curator and students is analyzed in a three-dimensional space, which is created by axes: understanding and democracy - misunderstanding and despotism; attentiveness and foresight - inattention and short-sightedness; efficiency, effective teamwork - passivity, unproductive teamwork. The method can be used to assess the behavior of the curator in the assessment of students (from the outside), for self-assessment of the curator and the description of the ideal curator. Depending on the level of diagnosis, the instructions change.","PeriodicalId":52798,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Psikhologiia","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Psikhologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2225-7756-2020-68-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The method of diagnosing interpersonal interactions of curators and students is designed to study the perception of curators and students in the academic group about themselves and the curator, as well as to study the relationship between curators and students of the group. The method determines the type of attitude to the curator in self-assessment and mutual assessment. The technique is constructed according to the type of Likert scale. The statements in the form of small crafts in Ukrainian folklore are selected for evaluation - proverbs and sayings, which in content are the quintessence of folk ideas about human relations, and in form - concise and easy to understand. In addition, a statement in "metaphorical" form is subjectively easier to evaluate than a direct answer. There are variables that determine the type of attitude to the curator: "Understanding and democracy"; "One step ahead: attentiveness and foresight", "Efficiency, teamwork efficiency". These characteristics reflect various aspects of interpersonal interaction in the academic group, where the curator may pay attention to each of the participants in the educational process, and may be careless and biased; can organize team activities, express their ideas and wishes; predict the likelihood of problematic, conflict situations and manage the process of their resolution, and may, conversely, be passive, inactive, critical of social phenomena and others, provoke conflicts and misunderstandings. The interpersonal interaction of the curator and students is analyzed in a three-dimensional space, which is created by axes: understanding and democracy - misunderstanding and despotism; attentiveness and foresight - inattention and short-sightedness; efficiency, effective teamwork - passivity, unproductive teamwork. The method can be used to assess the behavior of the curator in the assessment of students (from the outside), for self-assessment of the curator and the description of the ideal curator. Depending on the level of diagnosis, the instructions change.
策展人与学生人际互动的诊断方法旨在研究学术群体中的策展人和学生对自己和策展人的感知,以及研究策展人与群体中的学生之间的关系。该方法决定了在自评和互评中对策展人的态度类型。该技术是根据李克特量表的类型构建的。在乌克兰民间传说中的小工艺品形式的陈述被选中进行评估-谚语和谚语,其内容是关于人际关系的民间思想的精髓,在形式-简洁易懂。此外,“隐喻”形式的陈述在主观上比直接回答更容易评估。决定对策展人态度的变量有:“理解与民主”;“领先一步:专注和远见”,“效率,团队效率”。这些特征反映了学术群体中人际互动的各个方面,策展人可能会关注教育过程中的每一个参与者,也可能是粗心大意和有偏见的;能组织团队活动,表达自己的想法和愿望;预测问题,冲突情况的可能性,并管理其解决过程,相反,可能是被动的,不活跃的,批评社会现象和其他,挑起冲突和误解。策展人与学生的人际互动在一个三维空间中进行分析,这个空间由以下几个轴构成:理解与民主-误解与专制;attentivity and foresight—不注意和短视;效率,有效的团队合作-被动,无效的团队合作。该方法可用于评估策展人在学生评估中的行为(从外部),对策展人的自我评估和对理想策展人的描述。根据诊断程度的不同,说明也会发生变化。