Manipulative Environmental Disclosure: Further Analysis of Corporate Projections of Environmental Capital Spending

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Jason Chen, Jennifer C Chen, Dennis M. Patten
{"title":"Manipulative Environmental Disclosure: Further Analysis of Corporate Projections of Environmental Capital Spending","authors":"Jason Chen, Jennifer C Chen, Dennis M. Patten","doi":"10.2308/APIN-51123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Following Patten (2005), we focus on corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditure projections and spending, and address two separate issues related to the corporate use of manipulative disclosure. First, we investigate whether potential increases in oversight and accountability due to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002 and the issuance of the Governmental Accountability Office's (GAO 2004) report on its investigation of corporate environmental disclosure may have induced firms to be less egregious in their use of overspending projections. Second, given the flexibility in the disclosure requirements, we explore whether, within the sample of companies providing projections of environmental capital spending, greater legitimacy exposures are associated with differences in the use of language within the disclosures. We find, first, that while the incidence and severity of over-projections of environmental capital spending decreased following the GAO (2004) report, the ch...","PeriodicalId":38883,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and the Public Interest","volume":"14 1","pages":"87-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and the Public Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/APIN-51123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Following Patten (2005), we focus on corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditure projections and spending, and address two separate issues related to the corporate use of manipulative disclosure. First, we investigate whether potential increases in oversight and accountability due to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002 and the issuance of the Governmental Accountability Office's (GAO 2004) report on its investigation of corporate environmental disclosure may have induced firms to be less egregious in their use of overspending projections. Second, given the flexibility in the disclosure requirements, we explore whether, within the sample of companies providing projections of environmental capital spending, greater legitimacy exposures are associated with differences in the use of language within the disclosures. We find, first, that while the incidence and severity of over-projections of environmental capital spending decreased following the GAO (2004) report, the ch...
操纵环境信息披露:企业环境资本支出预测的进一步分析
摘要:本文遵循Patten(2005)的观点,重点研究了企业环境资本支出预测和支出的披露,并讨论了与企业使用操纵性披露相关的两个独立问题。首先,我们调查了由于2002年萨班斯-奥克斯利法案(SOX)的通过和政府问责局(GAO)关于其对企业环境披露的调查报告的发布,是否潜在的监督和问责制的增加可能导致公司在使用超支预测时不那么过分。其次,考虑到披露要求的灵活性,我们探讨了在提供环境资本支出预测的公司样本中,更大的合法性风险是否与披露中语言使用的差异有关。我们发现,首先,尽管在政府问责局(2004)报告发布后,环境资本支出过度预测的发生率和严重程度有所下降,但环境资本支出过度预测的比例却有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting and the Public Interest
Accounting and the Public Interest Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信