Participant-mix and management of qualified pension plans

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Sharad Asthana
{"title":"Participant-mix and management of qualified pension plans","authors":"Sharad Asthana","doi":"10.2308/API.2009.9.1.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined‐benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions.","PeriodicalId":38883,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and the Public Interest","volume":"9 1","pages":"100-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and the Public Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/API.2009.9.1.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined‐benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions.
合格养老金计划的参与人组合和管理
摘要:本文考察了合格养老金计划的管理是否受到计划参与者组合的影响。有证据表明,由高薪酬员工主导的固定收益养老金计划往往会超过《国内税收法》要求的最低金额(流动效应),导致计划资金过剩(股票效应),然后使用激进的精算假设来掩盖超额资金,以避免可见性成本(报告效应)。当赞助企业有一个活跃的工会(监测效应)时,这些效应不太可能发生。这些发现将引起联邦政府、养老金福利担保公司、雇员和工会的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting and the Public Interest
Accounting and the Public Interest Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信