EVALUATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL STATUS AND DIVERSITY OF MACROPHYTES OF DRAINAGE DITCHES THREATENED BY A PESTICIDE TOMB

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
M. Grzybowski, J. Szarek, K. Skibniewska, J. Guziur, J. Duriasz
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL STATUS AND DIVERSITY OF MACROPHYTES OF DRAINAGE DITCHES THREATENED BY A PESTICIDE TOMB","authors":"M. Grzybowski, J. Szarek, K. Skibniewska, J. Guziur, J. Duriasz","doi":"10.2478/V10020-010-0024-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research was aimed at determining whether a pesticide tomb affects the ecological status of drainage ditches located in its vicinity as well as how it affects the diversity of the flora of the ditches and in which direction its effect on the surrounding environment is. In addition, the results of the study are a contribution to a comparative analysis of methods for macrophyte evaluation of watercourses used in Poland and to identify the possibilities of their application in investigations of artificial watercourses under the pressure of pesticides. Values of indices of the hydromorphological evaluation (HQA, HMS) were similar for all drainage ditches examined. This points to a negligible effect of the pesticide tomb on the hydromorphological characteristics of the analyzed watercourses. The pesticide tomb was found to affect the ecological status and floral diversity of the drainage ditches. The lowest values of macrophyte and diversity indices were recorded in the first and the second watercourse, whereas higher ones were in the third watercourse. Changes in the indices of ecological status and those of floral diversity observed in the watercourses examined show that the effect of the pesticide tomb on the surrounding ecosystem is consistent with topographic features and proceeds in a north-easterly direction. Both methods of the macrophyte evaluation of the ecological status of watercourses (MTR, MIR) yield different numeric values, yet their results are comparable in terms of the tendency of changes in the ecological status of the analyzed watercourses. In both methods, the highest rank was reported for the third watercourse. The MTR index diversifies the examined watercourses to a smaller extent than the MIR index. The MIR method is better under conditions of lowland Poland for the evaluation of the ecological status of artificial watercourses, as it enables stronger diversification of the ecological status of the watercourses examined due to a higher number of indicatory species.","PeriodicalId":39364,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Natural Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"259-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/V10020-010-0024-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The research was aimed at determining whether a pesticide tomb affects the ecological status of drainage ditches located in its vicinity as well as how it affects the diversity of the flora of the ditches and in which direction its effect on the surrounding environment is. In addition, the results of the study are a contribution to a comparative analysis of methods for macrophyte evaluation of watercourses used in Poland and to identify the possibilities of their application in investigations of artificial watercourses under the pressure of pesticides. Values of indices of the hydromorphological evaluation (HQA, HMS) were similar for all drainage ditches examined. This points to a negligible effect of the pesticide tomb on the hydromorphological characteristics of the analyzed watercourses. The pesticide tomb was found to affect the ecological status and floral diversity of the drainage ditches. The lowest values of macrophyte and diversity indices were recorded in the first and the second watercourse, whereas higher ones were in the third watercourse. Changes in the indices of ecological status and those of floral diversity observed in the watercourses examined show that the effect of the pesticide tomb on the surrounding ecosystem is consistent with topographic features and proceeds in a north-easterly direction. Both methods of the macrophyte evaluation of the ecological status of watercourses (MTR, MIR) yield different numeric values, yet their results are comparable in terms of the tendency of changes in the ecological status of the analyzed watercourses. In both methods, the highest rank was reported for the third watercourse. The MTR index diversifies the examined watercourses to a smaller extent than the MIR index. The MIR method is better under conditions of lowland Poland for the evaluation of the ecological status of artificial watercourses, as it enables stronger diversification of the ecological status of the watercourses examined due to a higher number of indicatory species.
受农药墓威胁的排水沟生态状况及植物多样性评价
本研究旨在确定农药墓是否影响其附近排水沟的生态状况,如何影响排水沟植物群的多样性,以及对周围环境的影响方向。此外,这项研究的结果有助于对波兰使用的水道的大型植物评价方法进行比较分析,并确定在杀虫剂压力下的人工水道调查中应用这些方法的可能性。各排水沟渠的水文形态评价指标(HQA、HMS)值基本一致。这表明农药墓对所分析的水道的水文形态特征的影响可以忽略不计。农药墓影响了排水沟的生态状况和植物多样性。大型植物和多样性指数在第1和第2水道中最低,在第3水道中最高。河道生态状况指数和植物多样性指数的变化表明,农药墓对周边生态系统的影响与地形特征一致,并呈东北方向发展。两种大型植物评价河道生态状况的方法(MTR, MIR)的数值不同,但其结果在所分析河道生态状况变化趋势方面具有可比性。在这两种方法中,第三条水道的等级最高。MTR指数比MIR指数在较小程度上使被测水道多样化。MIR方法在波兰低地的条件下比较适合评价人工水道的生态状况,因为它使所检查的水道的生态状况更加多样化,因为指示物种的数量较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Natural Sciences
Polish Journal of Natural Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信