Navigating in Unknown Waters: Proposing, Collecting Data, and Writing a Qualitative Dissertation.

IF 0.5 0 LITERATURE
C. Bencich, Elizabeth Graber, J. Staben, K. Sohn
{"title":"Navigating in Unknown Waters: Proposing, Collecting Data, and Writing a Qualitative Dissertation.","authors":"C. Bencich, Elizabeth Graber, J. Staben, K. Sohn","doi":"10.2307/1512150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of the dissertation research process, doctoral students cannot see the end, nor can they imagine how they will get there. For many like Elizabeth Graber of Homer, Alaska; Jenny Staben of Waukegan, Illinois; and Katherine Sohn of Pikeville, Kentucky, conducting the work of comprehensive exam preparation, proposal development, and dissertation research away from the host institution adds a multitude of challenges to the process. To achieve their goal of finishing the dissertation and earning the elusive PhD, each of them chose qualitative methodology which suited their individual purposes of describing particular settings and sharing particular stories of college literacy students rather than theoretical, philosophical, and quantitative approaches. Because qualitative research methods enlarge the vision of what counts as knowledge, who can have it, and how it is generated, challenged, and evaluated (Fleischer), and because interviews allow participants to express their \"ideas, thoughts, and memories in their own words rather than in the words of the researcher\" (Reinharz 19), all three chose to use interviews as a primary source of data collection. They each hoped that their research results might","PeriodicalId":47107,"journal":{"name":"COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1512150","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1512150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

At the beginning of the dissertation research process, doctoral students cannot see the end, nor can they imagine how they will get there. For many like Elizabeth Graber of Homer, Alaska; Jenny Staben of Waukegan, Illinois; and Katherine Sohn of Pikeville, Kentucky, conducting the work of comprehensive exam preparation, proposal development, and dissertation research away from the host institution adds a multitude of challenges to the process. To achieve their goal of finishing the dissertation and earning the elusive PhD, each of them chose qualitative methodology which suited their individual purposes of describing particular settings and sharing particular stories of college literacy students rather than theoretical, philosophical, and quantitative approaches. Because qualitative research methods enlarge the vision of what counts as knowledge, who can have it, and how it is generated, challenged, and evaluated (Fleischer), and because interviews allow participants to express their "ideas, thoughts, and memories in their own words rather than in the words of the researcher" (Reinharz 19), all three chose to use interviews as a primary source of data collection. They each hoped that their research results might
导航在未知的水域:建议,收集数据,并撰写定性论文。
在论文研究过程的开始,博士生看不到终点,也无法想象他们将如何到达那里。对许多人来说,比如阿拉斯加荷马的伊丽莎白·格雷伯;伊利诺伊州沃基根市的珍妮·斯塔本;以及肯塔基州派克维尔的凯瑟琳·索恩(Katherine Sohn),在远离主办机构的地方进行全面的考试准备、提案制定和论文研究工作,给这一过程增加了许多挑战。为了实现完成论文和获得难以捉摸的博士学位的目标,他们每个人都选择了适合他们个人目的的定性方法,以描述特定的设置和分享大学读写学生的特定故事,而不是理论,哲学和定量方法。因为定性研究方法扩大了什么是知识的视野,谁可以拥有它,以及它是如何产生,挑战和评估的(Fleischer),因为访谈允许参与者用自己的语言表达他们的“想法,想法和记忆,而不是用研究人员的语言”(Reinharz 19),这三个人都选择使用访谈作为数据收集的主要来源。他们每个人都希望他们的研究结果可以
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: College Composition and Communication publishes research and scholarship in rhetoric and composition studies that supports college teachers in reflecting on and improving their practices in teaching writing and that reflects the most current scholarship and theory in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信