Pushing and Pulling Tasks: Practical Techniques and Criteria for Measuring and Interpreting Detected Forces Using Digital Versus Traditional Analog Dynamometers. Suggestions for Implementing Standards

Colombini D
{"title":"Pushing and Pulling Tasks: Practical Techniques and Criteria for Measuring and Interpreting Detected Forces Using Digital Versus Traditional Analog Dynamometers. Suggestions for Implementing Standards","authors":"Colombini D","doi":"10.23880/eoij-16000302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The main objectives of the paper is to compare the measurement of forces during pushing/pulling tasks using digital and analog dynamometers, showing the advantages of the first device and to propose guidelines for measurement interpretation with special attention to practitioners needs. Methods: The paper includes procedures for comparing the reproducibility of analog and digital dynamometers and for determining relationships between measured forces and subjective evaluations using Borg CR-10 Scale. Results: Examples are presented of measurements carried out with digital dynamometers using the original methodology, illustrating advantages and limits. Inter/intra-observer validation tests confirm the advantages of digital over analog dynamometers. Comparisons between measured data and subjective force ratings are presented and confirm good correlations. Conclusion: The results confirm that digital dynamometers, using proposed original methodology, generate more accurate information than analog. The methodology may be useful for future revision of ISO Standard. Open issues are underscored to stimulate additional research.","PeriodicalId":92777,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics international journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/eoij-16000302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The main objectives of the paper is to compare the measurement of forces during pushing/pulling tasks using digital and analog dynamometers, showing the advantages of the first device and to propose guidelines for measurement interpretation with special attention to practitioners needs. Methods: The paper includes procedures for comparing the reproducibility of analog and digital dynamometers and for determining relationships between measured forces and subjective evaluations using Borg CR-10 Scale. Results: Examples are presented of measurements carried out with digital dynamometers using the original methodology, illustrating advantages and limits. Inter/intra-observer validation tests confirm the advantages of digital over analog dynamometers. Comparisons between measured data and subjective force ratings are presented and confirm good correlations. Conclusion: The results confirm that digital dynamometers, using proposed original methodology, generate more accurate information than analog. The methodology may be useful for future revision of ISO Standard. Open issues are underscored to stimulate additional research.
推和拉任务:使用数字与传统模拟测力计测量和解释检测力的实用技术和标准。实施标准的建议
目的:本文的主要目的是比较使用数字和模拟测功机在推/拉任务期间的力的测量,显示第一种设备的优势,并提出测量解释的指导方针,特别注意从业者的需求。方法:本文包括比较模拟和数字测力计的再现性,以及确定测量力与博格CR-10量表主观评价之间的关系的程序。结果:给出了使用原始方法的数字测功机进行测量的例子,说明了优点和局限性。观察者之间/内部验证测试证实了数字测功机优于模拟测功机的优势。在测量数据和主观力评级之间进行了比较,并证实了良好的相关性。结论:结果证实,数字测功机,使用提出的原始方法,产生更准确的信息比模拟。该方法可能对今后ISO标准的修订有用。强调悬而未决的问题,以刺激进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信