Post-Trans Human Techno Science as Help or Threat: An Overview with Emphasis on a Current Nanotechnology Application

P. Di Sia
{"title":"Post-Trans Human Techno Science as Help or Threat: An Overview with Emphasis on a Current Nanotechnology Application","authors":"P. Di Sia","doi":"10.23880/eoij-16000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The paper focuses on the progressive growth of a particular direction of science which, in the name of an alleged human and social progress, is imposing itself in a disputable way, progressively stifling people’s freedom of choice. Never as in this time, technoscience has been trying to impose its highly questionable rules, to the detriment of human freedom and health. True science is currently often confused with a sort of scientism. The scientific medicine fights against unofficial medicines and is enjoying a credit comparable to a religion. Methods: The paper analyzes the role of technoscience in the post-transhuman framework, with particular attention to nanotechnologies and to the unfortunate consequences emerging from its recent application in the field of gene sera in relation to Covid-19 pandemic. Results: Technoscience and nanotechnological applications, closely related to it, can become dangerous tools for the future of humanity if their use is not properly controlled through truly scientific methods. An illuminating example of this is the use of experimental drugs, improperly called vaccines, from the past year throughout the world. Conclusion: We cannot speak of true science and technoscience at the service of the individual if freedom and human dignity are not respected or overshadowed through social impositions without real scientific basis. Scientific discoveries and technological inventions are acceptable if they respect human dignity and aim at the common good and not at the advantage of an elite.","PeriodicalId":92777,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics international journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/eoij-16000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The paper focuses on the progressive growth of a particular direction of science which, in the name of an alleged human and social progress, is imposing itself in a disputable way, progressively stifling people’s freedom of choice. Never as in this time, technoscience has been trying to impose its highly questionable rules, to the detriment of human freedom and health. True science is currently often confused with a sort of scientism. The scientific medicine fights against unofficial medicines and is enjoying a credit comparable to a religion. Methods: The paper analyzes the role of technoscience in the post-transhuman framework, with particular attention to nanotechnologies and to the unfortunate consequences emerging from its recent application in the field of gene sera in relation to Covid-19 pandemic. Results: Technoscience and nanotechnological applications, closely related to it, can become dangerous tools for the future of humanity if their use is not properly controlled through truly scientific methods. An illuminating example of this is the use of experimental drugs, improperly called vaccines, from the past year throughout the world. Conclusion: We cannot speak of true science and technoscience at the service of the individual if freedom and human dignity are not respected or overshadowed through social impositions without real scientific basis. Scientific discoveries and technological inventions are acceptable if they respect human dignity and aim at the common good and not at the advantage of an elite.
后人类技术科学的帮助或威胁:概述与当前纳米技术的应用重点
目的:本文的重点是科学的一个特定方向的渐进增长,在所谓的人类和社会进步的名义下,正在以一种有争议的方式强加自己,逐步扼杀人们的选择自由。从来没有像现在这样,科技一直在试图强加其非常有问题的规则,损害人类的自由和健康。真正的科学目前常常与某种科学主义相混淆。科学医学与非官方医学作斗争,享有与宗教相当的信誉。方法:本文分析了技术科学在后超人类框架中的作用,特别关注纳米技术及其最近在与Covid-19大流行相关的基因血清领域的应用所产生的不幸后果。结果:与之密切相关的技术科学和纳米技术应用,如果不能通过真正科学的方法对其使用进行适当控制,就可能成为威胁人类未来的危险工具。这方面的一个有启发性的例子是去年在世界各地使用实验性药物,不恰当地称为疫苗。结论:如果自由和人的尊严在没有真正科学基础的情况下不受到尊重或因社会强加而蒙上阴影,我们就不能谈论为个人服务的真正科学和技术。科学发现和技术发明是可以接受的,如果它们尊重人的尊严,以共同利益为目标,而不是为了精英的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信