Introduction to the special issue ethnographic ear

P. Cichocki
{"title":"Introduction to the special issue ethnographic ear","authors":"P. Cichocki","doi":"10.23858/ethp39.2018.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethnography has never been undertaken in a world of complete silence.1 Despite this, ethnographers have barely acknowledged that the world they study is also layered with sounds. It was only in the eighties, when publications forming the foundations of the anthropology of sound emerged, that the incorporation of the sonic in ethnographic work began. However, despite wide admiration for the works of Paul Stoller (1989), Tim Ingold (2016) or Steven Feld (1982), sound for many ethnographers remains something of an exotic field, involving a research methodology that by some is perceived as almost esoteric. Yet, sound is not a separate world, or a distinct sphere of fieldwork. The way in which we experience sound in the environment is integrated with our other senses, and indeed with our entire bodily constitution. Moreover, even if we are dealing with a recorded sound, the materiality of the medium and the location of the listener’s body in space are crucial. The spaces throughout which sound reverberates are built by physical (recently also virtual) infrastructures, material surfaces and elements of the landscape. Or, to put it in the terms of an example from an essential study, the ethnographic description of rainforest sounds integrates trees, animals and, finally, people living in the forest, and concerns their perceptions of sounds as intertwined with their other senses (Feld 1982). Yet, writing an ethnographic description centred on sound is challenging. How to address something that is “deafeningly obvious” to paraphrase the words of Daniel Miller and Sophie Woodward (2007, 341)? The task is puzzling because, as Mbembe argues, “there is nothing more complex than verbalizing that which involves the non-verbal, or describing sound, which in essence is neither linguistic nor involves the purely spontaneous practice of language” (Mbembe 2005, 74). Moreover, the","PeriodicalId":34666,"journal":{"name":"Ethnologia Polona","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnologia Polona","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23858/ethp39.2018.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethnography has never been undertaken in a world of complete silence.1 Despite this, ethnographers have barely acknowledged that the world they study is also layered with sounds. It was only in the eighties, when publications forming the foundations of the anthropology of sound emerged, that the incorporation of the sonic in ethnographic work began. However, despite wide admiration for the works of Paul Stoller (1989), Tim Ingold (2016) or Steven Feld (1982), sound for many ethnographers remains something of an exotic field, involving a research methodology that by some is perceived as almost esoteric. Yet, sound is not a separate world, or a distinct sphere of fieldwork. The way in which we experience sound in the environment is integrated with our other senses, and indeed with our entire bodily constitution. Moreover, even if we are dealing with a recorded sound, the materiality of the medium and the location of the listener’s body in space are crucial. The spaces throughout which sound reverberates are built by physical (recently also virtual) infrastructures, material surfaces and elements of the landscape. Or, to put it in the terms of an example from an essential study, the ethnographic description of rainforest sounds integrates trees, animals and, finally, people living in the forest, and concerns their perceptions of sounds as intertwined with their other senses (Feld 1982). Yet, writing an ethnographic description centred on sound is challenging. How to address something that is “deafeningly obvious” to paraphrase the words of Daniel Miller and Sophie Woodward (2007, 341)? The task is puzzling because, as Mbembe argues, “there is nothing more complex than verbalizing that which involves the non-verbal, or describing sound, which in essence is neither linguistic nor involves the purely spontaneous practice of language” (Mbembe 2005, 74). Moreover, the
《民族志》特刊导言
民族志从来没有在一个完全沉默的世界里进行过尽管如此,民族志学家几乎没有承认他们研究的世界也是由声音分层的。直到80年代,当形成声音人类学基础的出版物出现时,才开始将声音纳入民族志工作。然而,尽管保罗·斯托勒(1989)、蒂姆·英戈尔德(2016)或史蒂文·菲尔德(1982)的作品受到广泛赞赏,但对于许多民族志学家来说,声音仍然是一个充满异国色彩的领域,涉及的研究方法被一些人认为几乎是深奥的。然而,声音并不是一个独立的世界,也不是一个独特的领域。我们在环境中体验声音的方式与我们的其他感官,实际上与我们的整个身体结构相结合。此外,即使我们正在处理录制的声音,媒介的物质性和听者身体在空间中的位置也是至关重要的。声音回响的空间由物理(最近也是虚拟的)基础设施、材料表面和景观元素组成。或者,用一项基本研究中的一个例子来说,对雨林声音的民族志描述整合了树木、动物,最后是生活在森林里的人,并将他们对声音的感知与其他感官交织在一起(Feld 1982)。然而,写一个以声音为中心的人种志描述是具有挑战性的。用丹尼尔·米勒(Daniel Miller)和索菲·伍德沃德(Sophie Woodward)(2007, 341)的话来说,如何解决一些“耳聋般明显”的问题?这项任务令人费解,因为正如Mbembe所说,“没有什么比语言化更复杂的了,它涉及到非语言的,或者描述声音,本质上既不是语言的,也不涉及纯粹自发的语言实践”(Mbembe 2005,74)。此外,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信