Relatório de Avaliação Mútua: análise comparativa de Cabo Verde e Senegal em relação ao papel do grupo de ação financeira (GAFI) na liderança das medidas de combate ao branqueamento de capitais e do financiamento do terrorismo

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Sheila Soraya Dias Gomes Mendes
{"title":"Relatório de Avaliação Mútua: análise comparativa de Cabo Verde e Senegal em relação ao papel do grupo de ação financeira (GAFI) na liderança das medidas de combate ao branqueamento de capitais e do financiamento do terrorismo","authors":"Sheila Soraya Dias Gomes Mendes","doi":"10.24840/2182-9845_2022-0001_0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aimed to define the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and its Style Regional Bodies (FSRBs) that combat money laundering and terrorist financing in the specific case of Cape Verde and Senegal with FATF`s recommendations with respect to the regulation and supervision. Therefore, a comparative analysis methodology with a descriptive-analytical approach was developed to compare two member countries of the Intergovernmental Action Group Against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA). In data collection, secondary data sources were used: theoretical literature on the subject and FATF report on Mutual Assessment Reports (RAM). This study analyzed variations in compliance with FATF standards between two GIABA member countries: Cape Verde and Senegal. It turned out that although Senegal has almost entirely extended these standards, Cape Verde only partially fulfilled them. These compliance variations are mainly attributed to the varying level of readiness in countries' commitment to legislative and regulatory requirements before the mutual evaluation process. This study makes a unique and vital contribution as it demonstrates the effectiveness of applying the FATF standards for these two GIABA member countries.","PeriodicalId":40129,"journal":{"name":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2022-0001_0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aimed to define the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and its Style Regional Bodies (FSRBs) that combat money laundering and terrorist financing in the specific case of Cape Verde and Senegal with FATF`s recommendations with respect to the regulation and supervision. Therefore, a comparative analysis methodology with a descriptive-analytical approach was developed to compare two member countries of the Intergovernmental Action Group Against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA). In data collection, secondary data sources were used: theoretical literature on the subject and FATF report on Mutual Assessment Reports (RAM). This study analyzed variations in compliance with FATF standards between two GIABA member countries: Cape Verde and Senegal. It turned out that although Senegal has almost entirely extended these standards, Cape Verde only partially fulfilled them. These compliance variations are mainly attributed to the varying level of readiness in countries' commitment to legislative and regulatory requirements before the mutual evaluation process. This study makes a unique and vital contribution as it demonstrates the effectiveness of applying the FATF standards for these two GIABA member countries.
相互评估报告:佛得角和塞内加尔关于金融行动特别工作组(fatf)在领导打击洗钱和恐怖主义融资措施方面的作用的比较分析
本文旨在定义金融行动特别工作组(FATF)及其风格区域机构(fsrb),该机构在佛得角和塞内加尔的具体案例中打击洗钱和恐怖主义融资,并提供FATF在监管和监督方面的建议。因此,开发了一种采用描述性分析方法的比较分析方法,以比较西非反洗钱政府间行动小组(GIABA)的两个成员国。在数据收集方面,使用了二手数据来源:关于该主题的理论文献和FATF关于相互评估报告(RAM)的报告。本研究分析了两个GIABA成员国:佛得角和塞内加尔在遵守FATF标准方面的差异。事实证明,虽然塞内加尔几乎完全扩大了这些标准,但佛得角只是部分地实现了这些标准。这些遵守情况的差异主要是由于各国在相互评价过程之前对立法和管理要求的承诺的准备程度不同。这项研究做出了独特而重要的贡献,因为它证明了在这两个GIABA成员国中应用FATF标准的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信