{"title":"Perspectives on the Jack Tales and Other North American Marchen","authors":"Paul Jordan-Smith, C. Lindahl","doi":"10.2307/1500435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perspectives on the Jack Tales and Other North American Marchen. Edited by Carl Lindahl. (Bloomington: Folklore Institute, 2002. Pp. vii + 179, foreword, photographs, notes, bibliography. $17.95 paper) Sixty years after Richard Chase cast his spell in folklore circles and the general public with The Jack Tales, the subgenre continues to beguile us: if, in fact, there is such an identifiable subgenre as \"a Jack tale\" (which in turn raises the question of whether \"genre\" and \"subgenre\" are still useful concepts). According to Carl Lindahl and other contributors to this anthology of articles and stories, genre is still a vital folkloristic concept and both Marchen and Jack tale are alive and well in spite of Chase, not because of him. Rather, as Lindahl makes clear, they are alive and are exceedingly richer and more varied than what Chase delivered. Lindahl's book comprises four essays (two by Lindahl), six transcripts of Jack tales (three of which are presented in two versions), and a memorial note on folklorist Herbert Halpert, whose research notes graced both Chase's Appalachian collection and Vance Randolph's Ozark tales (WAo Blowed Up the Church House), and whose spirit hovers, no doubt bemused, throughout. Lindahl's introduction gives a short survey of North American Marchen studies, focusing particularly on the question of why the academy has let them fall into neglect. He also examines Chase's influence on the academy and the public, as well as the careers of other scholars of the genre, including Leonard W. Roberts, Vance Randolph, Herbert Halpert, Chuck Perdue, and others. In his second essay, \"Sounding a Shy Tradition: Oral and Written Styles of American Mountain Marchen,\" Lindahl continues his examination of Chase, Randolph, and Roberts, comparing versions of tales included in the present collection, and concluding that Roberts's versions were vastly more faithful to the oral styles of the tellers than either Chase's literary versions or those of Randolph, who tended to present them, in Lindahl's view, as legends or jokes. Charles L. Perdue Jr., in his essay, \"Is Old Jack Really Richard Chase?\" compares Chase's published version of Jack tales with their unaltered transcripts and analyzes the eleven tales published by Isabel Gordon Carter in 1925, demonstrating that Chase's versions were \"less emblematic of the narrators he claimed to represent and more a reflection of himself.\" Chase, a shameless self-promoter, had a well-developed talent for appropriation, as he subsequently came to assume \"ownership\" of the tales he published-one might almost say, of the genre itself-becoming not merely a collector but a performer. After collecting tales in North Carolina in the late 30s, he attached himself to James Taylor Adams, and the two of them collected Jack tales from tellers in Wise County, Virginia. The present work gives both Adams's and Chase's simultaneous transcripts of a single tale, \"Jack and the Bull,\" as told in 1941 by Polly Johnson. …","PeriodicalId":44624,"journal":{"name":"WESTERN FOLKLORE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1500435","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WESTERN FOLKLORE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1500435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Perspectives on the Jack Tales and Other North American Marchen. Edited by Carl Lindahl. (Bloomington: Folklore Institute, 2002. Pp. vii + 179, foreword, photographs, notes, bibliography. $17.95 paper) Sixty years after Richard Chase cast his spell in folklore circles and the general public with The Jack Tales, the subgenre continues to beguile us: if, in fact, there is such an identifiable subgenre as "a Jack tale" (which in turn raises the question of whether "genre" and "subgenre" are still useful concepts). According to Carl Lindahl and other contributors to this anthology of articles and stories, genre is still a vital folkloristic concept and both Marchen and Jack tale are alive and well in spite of Chase, not because of him. Rather, as Lindahl makes clear, they are alive and are exceedingly richer and more varied than what Chase delivered. Lindahl's book comprises four essays (two by Lindahl), six transcripts of Jack tales (three of which are presented in two versions), and a memorial note on folklorist Herbert Halpert, whose research notes graced both Chase's Appalachian collection and Vance Randolph's Ozark tales (WAo Blowed Up the Church House), and whose spirit hovers, no doubt bemused, throughout. Lindahl's introduction gives a short survey of North American Marchen studies, focusing particularly on the question of why the academy has let them fall into neglect. He also examines Chase's influence on the academy and the public, as well as the careers of other scholars of the genre, including Leonard W. Roberts, Vance Randolph, Herbert Halpert, Chuck Perdue, and others. In his second essay, "Sounding a Shy Tradition: Oral and Written Styles of American Mountain Marchen," Lindahl continues his examination of Chase, Randolph, and Roberts, comparing versions of tales included in the present collection, and concluding that Roberts's versions were vastly more faithful to the oral styles of the tellers than either Chase's literary versions or those of Randolph, who tended to present them, in Lindahl's view, as legends or jokes. Charles L. Perdue Jr., in his essay, "Is Old Jack Really Richard Chase?" compares Chase's published version of Jack tales with their unaltered transcripts and analyzes the eleven tales published by Isabel Gordon Carter in 1925, demonstrating that Chase's versions were "less emblematic of the narrators he claimed to represent and more a reflection of himself." Chase, a shameless self-promoter, had a well-developed talent for appropriation, as he subsequently came to assume "ownership" of the tales he published-one might almost say, of the genre itself-becoming not merely a collector but a performer. After collecting tales in North Carolina in the late 30s, he attached himself to James Taylor Adams, and the two of them collected Jack tales from tellers in Wise County, Virginia. The present work gives both Adams's and Chase's simultaneous transcripts of a single tale, "Jack and the Bull," as told in 1941 by Polly Johnson. …
《杰克故事集》和其他北美小说的视角。卡尔·林达尔编辑。布卢明顿:民俗研究所,2002。第vii + 179页,前言,照片,注释,参考书目。在理查德·蔡斯以《杰克的故事》在民间传说界和普通大众中施展他的魔力60年后,这个亚类型继续吸引着我们:如果事实上存在这样一个可识别的亚类型,即“杰克的故事”(这反过来又提出了“类型”和“亚类型”是否仍然是有用的概念的问题)。根据卡尔·林达尔和其他撰稿人的文章和故事选集,类型仍然是一个重要的民俗学概念,Marchen和Jack的故事都很生动,尽管蔡斯,不是因为他。相反,正如林达尔明确指出的那样,它们是活生生的,而且比蔡斯的作品更加丰富多彩。林达尔的书包括四篇散文(两篇由林达尔撰写),六篇杰克故事的抄本(其中三篇以两个版本呈现),以及一篇民俗学家赫伯特·哈尔珀特的纪念笔记,他的研究笔记为蔡斯的《阿巴拉契亚故事集》和万斯·伦道夫的《奥扎克故事集》(WAo炸毁了教堂)增色不少,他的精神无疑在整个过程中徘徊,令人困惑。林达尔的引言对北美的马尔钦研究做了一个简短的调查,特别关注为什么学院让他们陷入忽视的问题。他还研究了蔡斯对学术界和公众的影响,以及其他流派学者的职业生涯,包括伦纳德·w·罗伯茨、万斯·伦道夫、赫伯特·哈尔珀特、查克·珀杜等人。在他的第二篇文章中,“聆听一个害羞的传统:美国山地马晨的口头和书面风格,”林达尔继续他对蔡斯,伦道夫和罗伯茨的研究,比较了目前收集的故事版本,得出的结论是罗伯茨的版本比蔡斯的文学版本或伦道夫的版本更忠实于讲述者的口头风格,在林达尔看来,伦道夫倾向于把它们呈现为传说或笑话。小查尔斯·l·珀杜(Charles L. Perdue Jr.)在他的文章《老杰克真的是理查德·蔡斯吗?》中,将蔡斯出版的杰克故事版本与未经修改的文本进行了比较,并分析了伊莎贝尔·戈登·卡特(Isabel Gordon Carter)于1925年出版的11个故事,证明蔡斯的版本“与其说是他声称要代表的叙述者的象征,不如说是他自己的反映”。蔡斯,一个无耻的自我推销者,在挪用方面有着高超的天赋,因为他后来开始承担起他所出版的故事的“所有权”——人们几乎可以说,是这一类型本身——不仅是一个收藏家,而且是一个表演者。30年代末,他在北卡罗来纳州收集故事后,与詹姆斯·泰勒·亚当斯(James Taylor Adams)结缘,两人从弗吉尼亚州怀斯县(Wise County)的讲述者那里收集杰克故事。这本书提供了亚当斯和蔡斯对同一个故事的同时抄本,《杰克与公牛》(Jack and The Bull)由波莉·约翰逊(Polly Johnson)于1941年讲述。…