Zum Text des Jeremiabuches

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
BIBLICA Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.2307/j.ctvc2rm2x.6
G. Fischer
{"title":"Zum Text des Jeremiabuches","authors":"G. Fischer","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvc2rm2x.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last 25 years or so have seen many published writings expressing a preference for the Greek text of Jeremiah. The reasons usually adduced (I.: the evidence of 4Q71; the shorter text; greater cohesion) cannot, however, demonstrate its priority. Instead a number of arguments (II.: the evidence of the tradition; the ideal programme; a more challenging text) suggest that preference should rather be given to the longer and more complex Hebrew text. The MT of Jeremiah represents to a much higher degree than does the LXX the 'original' version of the book of Jeremiah.","PeriodicalId":44605,"journal":{"name":"BIBLICA","volume":"78 1","pages":"305-328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BIBLICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc2rm2x.6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The last 25 years or so have seen many published writings expressing a preference for the Greek text of Jeremiah. The reasons usually adduced (I.: the evidence of 4Q71; the shorter text; greater cohesion) cannot, however, demonstrate its priority. Instead a number of arguments (II.: the evidence of the tradition; the ideal programme; a more challenging text) suggest that preference should rather be given to the longer and more complex Hebrew text. The MT of Jeremiah represents to a much higher degree than does the LXX the 'original' version of the book of Jeremiah.
杰里米书的歌词
在过去25年左右的时间里,许多出版的作品都表达了对希腊文《耶利米书》的偏爱。通常引用的原因(1 .:4Q71的证据;较短的文本;然而,更大的凝聚力并不能证明其优先性。取而代之的是一些参数(II。:传统的证据;理想方案;一个更具挑战性的文本)建议优先考虑更长的和更复杂的希伯来文本。《耶利米书》的MT比LXX(《耶利米书》的“原始”版本)所代表的程度高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BIBLICA
BIBLICA RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信