Mr. Collie Goes to London: - The House of Lords Decision in Common Services Agency vs. The Scottish Information Commissioner

R. Gertz
{"title":"Mr. Collie Goes to London: - The House of Lords Decision in Common Services Agency vs. The Scottish Information Commissioner","authors":"R. Gertz","doi":"10.2202/1941-6008.1089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"July 2008 saw a conclusion to a case which began with a request to the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service (hereinafter ‘the CSA') under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (hereinafter ‘FOISA') and culminated in a hearing in front of the House of Lords as Court of Appeal. The outcome, however, can be considered both a triumph and a failure for data protection law.This paper analyzes the House of Lords decision to determine whether the judgment has provided more legal clarity in an area in which guidance is still very much required.","PeriodicalId":88318,"journal":{"name":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1941-6008.1089","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

July 2008 saw a conclusion to a case which began with a request to the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service (hereinafter ‘the CSA') under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (hereinafter ‘FOISA') and culminated in a hearing in front of the House of Lords as Court of Appeal. The outcome, however, can be considered both a triumph and a failure for data protection law.This paper analyzes the House of Lords decision to determine whether the judgment has provided more legal clarity in an area in which guidance is still very much required.
柯利先生去伦敦:-上议院对公共服务局与苏格兰信息专员的判决
2008年7月,一个案件结案,该案首先根据《2002年信息自由(苏格兰)法》(以下简称《信息自由法》)向苏格兰卫生服务共同服务局(以下简称"卫生服务局")提出请求,最后在上议院作为上诉法院举行听证会。然而,这一结果既可以被视为数据保护法的胜利,也可以被视为失败。本文分析了上议院的决定,以确定该判决是否在一个仍然非常需要指导的领域提供了更多的法律清晰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信