Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Sudden Death: How to Identify High Risk Patients?

B. Finkler, T. Leiria, Clovis Fröemming Jr, Javier Pinos, D. Zanotta, M. Kruse, L. M. Pires, G. G. Lima
{"title":"Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Sudden Death: How to Identify High Risk Patients?","authors":"B. Finkler, T. Leiria, Clovis Fröemming Jr, Javier Pinos, D. Zanotta, M. Kruse, L. M. Pires, G. G. Lima","doi":"10.24207/jca.v33i1.3385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiac failure with preserved ejection fraction corresponds to half of the cardiac failure cases, having a similar prognosis to patients with reduced ejection fraction. Cardiac sudden death is responsible to about one quarter of the death on these patients. Despite some trials were intended to identify patients with a higher risk to these outcome, it is not already know: how we should proceed to stratify the risk of sudden death in this patients. Methods: To assess the profile of patients with cardiac sudden death and cardiac failure with preserved ejection fraction, we did a literature review, searching for the newer articles about the theme. Outcome: Several trials were published involving patients with divers characteristics that can help us to identify patients with a higher risk of sudden death. The publication of risk score demonstrated that would be possible to identify patients with a >10% risk of sudden death in 5 years, what would be equivalent to the risk of reduced ejection fraction patients eligible to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Trials with electrophysiological study and programmed ventricular stimulation showed a good strategy to identify low risk patients for future arrhythmic events. Conclusion: Sudden death must be a target of the therapy in the patients with preserved heart failure. Efforts should be done with the objective to identify higher risk patients and search for the better risk stratification strategy, and after that, the definition of the benefit or not, of the invasive therapy as ICD.","PeriodicalId":33934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24207/jca.v33i1.3385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac failure with preserved ejection fraction corresponds to half of the cardiac failure cases, having a similar prognosis to patients with reduced ejection fraction. Cardiac sudden death is responsible to about one quarter of the death on these patients. Despite some trials were intended to identify patients with a higher risk to these outcome, it is not already know: how we should proceed to stratify the risk of sudden death in this patients. Methods: To assess the profile of patients with cardiac sudden death and cardiac failure with preserved ejection fraction, we did a literature review, searching for the newer articles about the theme. Outcome: Several trials were published involving patients with divers characteristics that can help us to identify patients with a higher risk of sudden death. The publication of risk score demonstrated that would be possible to identify patients with a >10% risk of sudden death in 5 years, what would be equivalent to the risk of reduced ejection fraction patients eligible to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Trials with electrophysiological study and programmed ventricular stimulation showed a good strategy to identify low risk patients for future arrhythmic events. Conclusion: Sudden death must be a target of the therapy in the patients with preserved heart failure. Efforts should be done with the objective to identify higher risk patients and search for the better risk stratification strategy, and after that, the definition of the benefit or not, of the invasive therapy as ICD.
保留射血分数的心力衰竭与猝死:如何识别高危患者?
背景:保留射血分数的心力衰竭占心力衰竭病例的一半,与射血分数降低的患者预后相似。心脏性猝死约占这些患者死亡人数的四分之一。尽管一些试验旨在识别这些结果风险较高的患者,但目前尚不清楚:我们应该如何对这些患者的猝死风险进行分层。方法:对保留射血分数的心源性猝死和心力衰竭患者进行文献回顾,检索有关该主题的最新文章。结果:发表了几项涉及具有不同特征的患者的试验,这些特征可以帮助我们识别具有较高猝死风险的患者。风险评分的发布表明,可以识别出5年内突然死亡风险为bbb10 %的患者,这相当于射血分数降低的患者有资格接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗。电生理研究和程序性心室刺激试验显示了识别未来心律失常事件低风险患者的良好策略。结论:猝死是保存性心力衰竭患者的治疗目标之一。应努力识别高风险患者,寻找更好的风险分层策略,然后确定侵入性治疗是否为ICD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信