Does a SWT Reverse Contagion Effect Exist from Humans to Automation?

Q3 Social Sciences
Rian Mehta, Bhoomin Chauhan, Maarten Edwards, Timothy G. Rosser, Victoria Dunbar, S. Rice
{"title":"Does a SWT Reverse Contagion Effect Exist from Humans to Automation?","authors":"Rian Mehta, Bhoomin Chauhan, Maarten Edwards, Timothy G. Rosser, Victoria Dunbar, S. Rice","doi":"10.22488/OKSTATE.19.100206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines passengers’ level of trust after a failure in a member of the flight crew. This study seeks to establish the possible presence of a reverse contagion effect wherein passenger trust in automated system components is affected by an error in a human system element. Trust was measured in five human entities and five automated aids with participants from both India and the United States. The human entities include the pilot, the co-pilot, the flight attendant, the maintenance manager, and the CEO of the airline. The automated aids were the oxygen masks, the auto-pilot system, the airplane’s flaps, the landing gear, and the video screens on the backs of the seats. This study was conducted in three stages, including two three-way ANOVAs to determine to effect, and meditation analyses to determine if affect mediates the effect. Participants were posed with two hypothetical scenarios, a control condition and a failure condition. The participants rated their levels of trust in the five different human entities and the five different automated aids. Trust was measured on a 7-point Likert type scale from –3 to +3. Questions relating to the participants’ feelings were also asked to measure affect. The results showed a decrease in trust in the automated aid after the human failure, as well as a country effect, and a mediating effect of affect.","PeriodicalId":39089,"journal":{"name":"Collegiate Aviation Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegiate Aviation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.19.100206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study examines passengers’ level of trust after a failure in a member of the flight crew. This study seeks to establish the possible presence of a reverse contagion effect wherein passenger trust in automated system components is affected by an error in a human system element. Trust was measured in five human entities and five automated aids with participants from both India and the United States. The human entities include the pilot, the co-pilot, the flight attendant, the maintenance manager, and the CEO of the airline. The automated aids were the oxygen masks, the auto-pilot system, the airplane’s flaps, the landing gear, and the video screens on the backs of the seats. This study was conducted in three stages, including two three-way ANOVAs to determine to effect, and meditation analyses to determine if affect mediates the effect. Participants were posed with two hypothetical scenarios, a control condition and a failure condition. The participants rated their levels of trust in the five different human entities and the five different automated aids. Trust was measured on a 7-point Likert type scale from –3 to +3. Questions relating to the participants’ feelings were also asked to measure affect. The results showed a decrease in trust in the automated aid after the human failure, as well as a country effect, and a mediating effect of affect.
从人类到自动化是否存在SWT反向传染效应?
这项研究考察了乘客在机组人员失败后的信任程度。本研究旨在建立逆向传染效应的可能存在,其中乘客对自动化系统组件的信任受到人为系统元素错误的影响。信任是通过五个人类实体和五个自动辅助工具来衡量的,参与者来自印度和美国。人类实体包括飞行员、副驾驶员、空乘人员、维护经理和航空公司的首席执行官。这些自动化辅助设备包括氧气面罩、自动驾驶系统、飞机的襟翼、起落架和座椅背面的视频屏幕。本研究分三个阶段进行,包括两个三向方差分析来确定效果,以及冥想分析来确定影响是否介导效果。参与者被提出了两个假设的场景,一个控制条件和一个失败条件。参与者对五种不同的人类实体和五种不同的自动化辅助工具的信任程度进行了评级。信任的测量采用李克特7分量表,从-3到+3。与参与者的感受有关的问题也被要求衡量影响。结果显示,在人为失败后,对自动援助的信任度下降,以及国家效应和情感中介效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegiate Aviation Review
Collegiate Aviation Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信