Discomfort Glare of White LED Lighting in Pedestrian Zones

Q4 Engineering
S. Kohko, M. Ayama
{"title":"Discomfort Glare of White LED Lighting in Pedestrian Zones","authors":"S. Kohko, M. Ayama","doi":"10.2150/JIEIJ.100.449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The previous study reported by some members of the Research Group for Glare Evaluation of Outdoor LED Light Sources established in the Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan, showed that luminance based photometric quantities have a stronger correlation to discomfort glare evaluation than those based on equivalent veiling luminance or illuminance at the observer’s eye. They proposed the m_DGI as an index to assess the degree of discomfort glare. However, the test lights that cause strong discomfort glare were not examined there. In this study, we conducted a subjective evaluation experiment using seven types of LED streetlights including those of higher luminance in the outer environment similar to the previous study. The results revealed several fi ndings. First, discomfort glare is strongly felt when the positional relationship between the pedestrian and lighting fi xtures is in a certain range; second, light sources with spatially non-uniform luminance distribution cause a strong discomfort glare; third, GR for sports-fi eld lighting is not suited for discomfort glare evaluation of pedestrian zones; and fourth, the relation found in the previous study was confi rmed. In addition, we confi rmed the versatility of m_DGI from weak to strong discomfort glare evaluation. We proposed a new index m_GR calculated using equivalent veiling luminance. Correlation to the discomfort glare evaluation is worse than m_DGI, our data indicate that m_GR is applicable to estimate a degree of discomfort glare in practical situations.","PeriodicalId":35437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan (Shomei Gakkai Shi)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2150/JIEIJ.100.449","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan (Shomei Gakkai Shi)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2150/JIEIJ.100.449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The previous study reported by some members of the Research Group for Glare Evaluation of Outdoor LED Light Sources established in the Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan, showed that luminance based photometric quantities have a stronger correlation to discomfort glare evaluation than those based on equivalent veiling luminance or illuminance at the observer’s eye. They proposed the m_DGI as an index to assess the degree of discomfort glare. However, the test lights that cause strong discomfort glare were not examined there. In this study, we conducted a subjective evaluation experiment using seven types of LED streetlights including those of higher luminance in the outer environment similar to the previous study. The results revealed several fi ndings. First, discomfort glare is strongly felt when the positional relationship between the pedestrian and lighting fi xtures is in a certain range; second, light sources with spatially non-uniform luminance distribution cause a strong discomfort glare; third, GR for sports-fi eld lighting is not suited for discomfort glare evaluation of pedestrian zones; and fourth, the relation found in the previous study was confi rmed. In addition, we confi rmed the versatility of m_DGI from weak to strong discomfort glare evaluation. We proposed a new index m_GR calculated using equivalent veiling luminance. Correlation to the discomfort glare evaluation is worse than m_DGI, our data indicate that m_GR is applicable to estimate a degree of discomfort glare in practical situations.
步行区白光LED照明的不适眩光
日本照明工程研究所“户外LED光源眩光评价研究小组”部分成员此前报告的研究表明,基于亮度的光度量与不舒适眩光评价的相关性强于基于等效遮蔽亮度或观察者眼睛处照度的光度量。他们建议将m_DGI作为评估眩光不适程度的指标。然而,引起强烈不适眩光的测试灯没有在那里进行检查。在本研究中,我们使用7种类型的LED路灯进行了主观评价实验,其中包括与之前研究相似的外部环境中亮度较高的LED路灯。研究结果揭示了几个发现。首先,当行人与照明设备的位置关系在一定范围内时,会强烈地感受到不适眩光;二是空间亮度分布不均匀的光源产生强烈的不适眩光;运动场地照明GR不适用于步行区不适眩光评价;第四,证实了之前研究中发现的关系。此外,我们证实了m_DGI从弱到强不适眩光评估的通用性。提出了一种利用等效遮挡亮度计算的新指数m_GR。与不适感眩光评估的相关性比m_DGI差,我们的数据表明m_GR适用于实际情况下估计不适感眩光的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan (Shomei Gakkai Shi)
Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan (Shomei Gakkai Shi) Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信