Teenage childbearing and long-term socioeconomic consequences: a case study in Sweden.

P. O. Olausson, B. Haglund, G. R. Weitoft, S. Cnattingius
{"title":"Teenage childbearing and long-term socioeconomic consequences: a case study in Sweden.","authors":"P. O. Olausson, B. Haglund, G. R. Weitoft, S. Cnattingius","doi":"10.2307/2673752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nWhether long-term socioeconomic problems experienced by many teenage mothers are a reflection of preexisting disadvantage or are consequences of teenage motherhood per se remains unclear.\n\n\nMETHODS\nNational data on all women born in Sweden from 1941 to 1970 who were younger than age 30 when they first gave birth (N=888,044) were analyzed. The outcome measures, assessed during adulthood, were employment status, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, single motherhood, family size, receipt of disability pension and dependence on welfare. Multiple logistic regression techniques were used to adjust for maternal birth cohort and for socioeconomic background of the woman's family.\n\n\nRESULTS\nCompared with Swedish women who first gave birth at ages 20-24, those who were teenage mothers had significantly increased odds of each unfavorable socioeconomic outcome in later life, even after the data were adjusted for family socioeconomic situation and maternal birth cohort. For example, teenage motherhood was positively associated with low educational attainment (odds ratios of 1.7-1.9, depending on the specific age during adolescence when the woman gave birth), with single living arrangements (odds ratios, 1.5-2.3), with high parity (odds ratios, 2.6-6.0), with collecting a disability pension (odds ratios, 1.6-1.9) and with welfare dependency (odds ratios, 1.9-2.6). These trends were usually linear, with the highest odds ratios corresponding to women who had had their first child at the youngest ages.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nA longitudinal analysis of record-linkage data from Sweden supports the view that childbearing during adolescence poses a risk for socioeconomic disadvantage in later life--even for adolescents from relatively comfortable backgrounds and for those who studied beyond elementary school.","PeriodicalId":75844,"journal":{"name":"Family planning perspectives","volume":"41 1","pages":"70-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2673752","citationCount":"145","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2673752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 145

Abstract

CONTEXT Whether long-term socioeconomic problems experienced by many teenage mothers are a reflection of preexisting disadvantage or are consequences of teenage motherhood per se remains unclear. METHODS National data on all women born in Sweden from 1941 to 1970 who were younger than age 30 when they first gave birth (N=888,044) were analyzed. The outcome measures, assessed during adulthood, were employment status, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, single motherhood, family size, receipt of disability pension and dependence on welfare. Multiple logistic regression techniques were used to adjust for maternal birth cohort and for socioeconomic background of the woman's family. RESULTS Compared with Swedish women who first gave birth at ages 20-24, those who were teenage mothers had significantly increased odds of each unfavorable socioeconomic outcome in later life, even after the data were adjusted for family socioeconomic situation and maternal birth cohort. For example, teenage motherhood was positively associated with low educational attainment (odds ratios of 1.7-1.9, depending on the specific age during adolescence when the woman gave birth), with single living arrangements (odds ratios, 1.5-2.3), with high parity (odds ratios, 2.6-6.0), with collecting a disability pension (odds ratios, 1.6-1.9) and with welfare dependency (odds ratios, 1.9-2.6). These trends were usually linear, with the highest odds ratios corresponding to women who had had their first child at the youngest ages. CONCLUSIONS A longitudinal analysis of record-linkage data from Sweden supports the view that childbearing during adolescence poses a risk for socioeconomic disadvantage in later life--even for adolescents from relatively comfortable backgrounds and for those who studied beyond elementary school.
青少年生育和长期社会经济后果:瑞典的一个案例研究。
许多少女母亲所经历的长期社会经济问题是先前存在的不利条件的反映,还是少女母亲本身的后果尚不清楚。方法分析了1941年至1970年在瑞典出生的30岁以下首次生育女性(N=888,044)的全国数据。在成年期评估的结果指标包括就业状况、社会经济地位、受教育程度、单身母亲、家庭规模、领取残疾抚恤金和对福利的依赖。采用多元逻辑回归技术调整产妇出生队列和妇女家庭的社会经济背景。结果与20-24岁首次生育的瑞典女性相比,即使在调整了家庭社会经济状况和产妇出生队列后,青少年母亲在晚年生活中出现各项不利社会经济结果的几率也显著增加。例如,少女母亲与低受教育程度(比值比为1.7-1.9,取决于妇女在青春期分娩的具体年龄)、单身生活安排(比值比为1.5-2.3)、高胎次(比值比为2.6-6.0)、领取残疾养恤金(比值比为1.6-1.9)和福利依赖(比值比为1.9-2.6)呈正相关。这些趋势通常是线性的,比值比最高的女性在最年轻的时候就生了第一个孩子。来自瑞典的一项对记录关联数据的纵向分析支持这样的观点,即青春期生育会给以后的生活带来社会经济劣势的风险——即使对那些背景相对舒适的青少年和那些小学毕业的青少年也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信