Union status, marital history and female contraceptive sterilization in the United States.

Amy L. Godecker, E. Thomson, L. Bumpass
{"title":"Union status, marital history and female contraceptive sterilization in the United States.","authors":"Amy L. Godecker, E. Thomson, L. Bumpass","doi":"10.2307/2673740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT Much of what is known about the choice of sterilization as a contraceptive method is based on data from married women or couples. Because of increasing rates of cohabitation, divorce and repartnering, however, the relationship context in which sterilization decisions are made has changed. METHODS The 1995 National Survey of Family Growth includes the complete birth and union histories of 10,277 white, black and Hispanic women. The distribution of union status and marital history at the time of tubal sterilization was estimated for these three racial and ethnic groups among the 799 women who had had a tubal ligation in 1990-1995 before age 40. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the effects of union status and marital history on the risk of tubal sterilization. The analysis controlled for the woman's age, parity, race and ethnicity education, region, experience of an unwanted birth and calendar period. RESULTS Among women who obtained a tubal sterilization, most whites (79%) and Hispanics (66%) were married when they had the operation, compared with only 36% of black women. At the time of their sterilization, 46% of black women had never been married. Among all women, regardless of race and ethnicity and net of all controls, the probability of tubal sterilization is about 25% lower for single, never-married women than for cohabiting or married women. Cohabitation does not reduce the likelihood in comparison to marriage, however. Higher rates of tubal sterilization among Hispanic women are accounted for by their higher parity at each age; differences in parity or marriage by race only partially account for the relatively higher rates of tubal sterilization among black women. CONCLUSIONS Because women currently spend greater proportions of their lives outside of marriage or in less-stable cohabiting partnerships than they did in the past, they are increasingly likely to make the decision to seek sterilization on their own. As a result, the gender gap in contraceptive sterilization will likely increase. The possibility of partnership change is an important consideration in choosing sterilization as a contraceptive method.","PeriodicalId":75844,"journal":{"name":"Family planning perspectives","volume":"33 1 1","pages":"35-41, 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2673740","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2673740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

CONTEXT Much of what is known about the choice of sterilization as a contraceptive method is based on data from married women or couples. Because of increasing rates of cohabitation, divorce and repartnering, however, the relationship context in which sterilization decisions are made has changed. METHODS The 1995 National Survey of Family Growth includes the complete birth and union histories of 10,277 white, black and Hispanic women. The distribution of union status and marital history at the time of tubal sterilization was estimated for these three racial and ethnic groups among the 799 women who had had a tubal ligation in 1990-1995 before age 40. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the effects of union status and marital history on the risk of tubal sterilization. The analysis controlled for the woman's age, parity, race and ethnicity education, region, experience of an unwanted birth and calendar period. RESULTS Among women who obtained a tubal sterilization, most whites (79%) and Hispanics (66%) were married when they had the operation, compared with only 36% of black women. At the time of their sterilization, 46% of black women had never been married. Among all women, regardless of race and ethnicity and net of all controls, the probability of tubal sterilization is about 25% lower for single, never-married women than for cohabiting or married women. Cohabitation does not reduce the likelihood in comparison to marriage, however. Higher rates of tubal sterilization among Hispanic women are accounted for by their higher parity at each age; differences in parity or marriage by race only partially account for the relatively higher rates of tubal sterilization among black women. CONCLUSIONS Because women currently spend greater proportions of their lives outside of marriage or in less-stable cohabiting partnerships than they did in the past, they are increasingly likely to make the decision to seek sterilization on their own. As a result, the gender gap in contraceptive sterilization will likely increase. The possibility of partnership change is an important consideration in choosing sterilization as a contraceptive method.
美国的婚姻状况、婚姻史与女性避孕绝育。
关于选择绝育作为一种避孕方法,我们所知道的大部分是基于已婚妇女或夫妇的数据。然而,由于同居、离婚和再婚的比率不断上升,决定绝育的关系环境发生了变化。方法1995年全国家庭增长调查包括10277名白人、黑人和西班牙裔妇女的完整出生和结合史。在1990-1995年期间40岁以前做过输卵管结扎手术的799名妇女中,对这三个种族和族裔群体在进行输卵管结扎手术时的婚姻状况和婚姻史分布进行了估计。采用Cox比例风险回归模型估计婚姻状况和婚姻史对输卵管绝育风险的影响。该分析控制了女性的年龄、性别、种族和民族教育程度、地区、意外生育经历和日历周期。结果在接受输卵管绝育手术的女性中,大多数白人(79%)和西班牙裔(66%)在手术时已婚,而黑人女性只有36%。在接受绝育手术时,46%的黑人女性从未结过婚。在所有女性中,不论种族和民族,未婚单身女性做输卵管绝育手术的概率比同居或已婚女性低25%左右。然而,与结婚相比,同居并不会降低可能性。西班牙裔妇女输卵管绝育率较高的原因是她们在每个年龄段的胎次都较高;胎次或婚姻的种族差异只是黑人妇女输卵管绝育率相对较高的部分原因。结论:与过去相比,现在的女性在婚姻之外或不太稳定的同居关系中度过了更多的时间,因此她们越来越有可能决定自己寻求绝育手术。因此,避孕绝育方面的性别差距可能会扩大。在选择绝育作为避孕方法时,伴侣关系改变的可能性是一个重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信