Public or private providers? U.S. women's use of reproductive health services.

J. Frost
{"title":"Public or private providers? U.S. women's use of reproductive health services.","authors":"J. Frost","doi":"10.2307/2673736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT U.S. women receive contraceptive and reproductive health services from a wide range of publicly funded and private providers. Information on trends in and on patterns of service use can help policymakers and program planners assess the adequacy of current services and plan for future improvements. METHODS Women who reported in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth that they had obtained any contraceptive or other reproductive health service in the past year were classified by their primary source of care, and the services they received, their characteristics and their primary source of care were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to test which factors predict women's use of publicly subsidized family planning clinics and of specific types of services. RESULTS The percentage of women of reproductive age who obtained family planning services increased slightly between 1988 and 1995, primarily among women aged 30 and older. Nearly one in four women who received any contraceptive care visited a publicly funded family planning clinic, as did one in three who received contraceptive counseling or sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing and treatment. Women whose primary source of reproductive care was a publicly funded family planning clinic received a wider range of services than women who visited private providers; moreover, the former were significantly more likely to report obtaining contraceptive care or STD-related care, even after the effects of their background characteristics were controlled. Young, unmarried, minority, less-educated and poor women were more likely than others to depend on publicly subsidized family planning clinics. Source of health insurance was one of the most important predictors of the use of public family planning clinics: Medicaid recipients and uninsured women were 3-4 times as likely as women with private insurance to obtain clinic care. CONCLUSIONS Publicly funded family planning clinics are an important source of contraceptive and other reproductive health care, providing millions of U.S. women with a wide range of services. Since women's need for reproductive care and for publicly subsidized care is not likely to diminish, clinics may be financially challenged in their efforts to continue delivering this broad package of services to growing numbers of uninsured or disenfranchised women.","PeriodicalId":75844,"journal":{"name":"Family planning perspectives","volume":"33 1 1","pages":"4-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2673736","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2673736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

CONTEXT U.S. women receive contraceptive and reproductive health services from a wide range of publicly funded and private providers. Information on trends in and on patterns of service use can help policymakers and program planners assess the adequacy of current services and plan for future improvements. METHODS Women who reported in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth that they had obtained any contraceptive or other reproductive health service in the past year were classified by their primary source of care, and the services they received, their characteristics and their primary source of care were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to test which factors predict women's use of publicly subsidized family planning clinics and of specific types of services. RESULTS The percentage of women of reproductive age who obtained family planning services increased slightly between 1988 and 1995, primarily among women aged 30 and older. Nearly one in four women who received any contraceptive care visited a publicly funded family planning clinic, as did one in three who received contraceptive counseling or sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing and treatment. Women whose primary source of reproductive care was a publicly funded family planning clinic received a wider range of services than women who visited private providers; moreover, the former were significantly more likely to report obtaining contraceptive care or STD-related care, even after the effects of their background characteristics were controlled. Young, unmarried, minority, less-educated and poor women were more likely than others to depend on publicly subsidized family planning clinics. Source of health insurance was one of the most important predictors of the use of public family planning clinics: Medicaid recipients and uninsured women were 3-4 times as likely as women with private insurance to obtain clinic care. CONCLUSIONS Publicly funded family planning clinics are an important source of contraceptive and other reproductive health care, providing millions of U.S. women with a wide range of services. Since women's need for reproductive care and for publicly subsidized care is not likely to diminish, clinics may be financially challenged in their efforts to continue delivering this broad package of services to growing numbers of uninsured or disenfranchised women.
公共还是私人供应商?美国妇女使用生殖健康服务的情况。
CONTEXTU.S。妇女从各种公共资助和私营提供者那里获得避孕和生殖健康服务。关于服务使用趋势和模式的信息可以帮助决策者和方案规划者评估当前服务的充分性,并计划今后的改进。方法在1995年全国家庭增长调查中报告在过去一年中获得任何避孕或其他生殖健康服务的妇女按其主要护理来源进行分类,并对其获得的服务、其特点和主要护理来源进行分析。使用逻辑回归来测试哪些因素预测妇女使用公共补贴的计划生育诊所和特定类型的服务。结果1988年至1995年间,获得计划生育服务的育龄妇女比例略有增加,主要是30岁及以上的妇女。在接受任何避孕护理的妇女中,有近四分之一的人去过公共资助的计划生育诊所,而在接受避孕咨询或性传播疾病(STD)检测和治疗的妇女中,也有三分之一的人去过。生殖保健的主要来源是公共资助的计划生育诊所的妇女比去私人诊所的妇女获得的服务范围更广;此外,即使在控制了其背景特征的影响之后,前者也更有可能报告获得避孕护理或性病相关护理。年轻、未婚、少数民族、受教育程度较低和贫穷的妇女比其他人更有可能依赖政府补贴的计划生育诊所。健康保险的来源是使用公共计划生育诊所的最重要预测因素之一:医疗补助接受者和没有保险的妇女获得诊所护理的可能性是有私人保险的妇女的3-4倍。结论政府资助的计划生育诊所是避孕和其他生殖保健的重要来源,为数百万美国妇女提供了广泛的服务。由于妇女对生殖保健和公共补贴保健的需求不太可能减少,诊所在努力继续向越来越多的没有保险或被剥夺权利的妇女提供这种广泛的一揽子服务时,可能会面临财政上的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信