A Study in Red and Black: Ethnic Humor in Colonial America

Ann S. Maydosz
{"title":"A Study in Red and Black: Ethnic Humor in Colonial America","authors":"Ann S. Maydosz","doi":"10.2307/2668548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ann Maydosz [*] The \"New Found Land,\" [1] as America was called by Thomas Harriot, one of the continent's first ethnographers, opened a Pandora's box of troubles for the Englishmen who landed there. Confounded by their unpreparedness for life there, they quickly discovered that unfamiliar terrain was an almost insurmountable obstacle. Yet, their eyes told them that people could thrive, even prosper there. Initially native societies evoked an awe born not just of curiosity about these newly discovered humans, but of necessity because the Native Americans' survival skills towered over the European settlers'. Eventually the transplanted Europeans were able to overcome their ineptness and led by the Native Americans, as chronicled by Harriot in his book A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia, began to carve out a life on the new continent. The European settlers' relationship with the Africans they encountered, though, suffered none of the self-doubt which infected first meetings with the Native Americans. Although Native Americans were also used as slaves, to the eyes of needy European colonists, the Africans held only one status: a conscriptable labor force. The owners of African slaves had no need or interest in learning the native culture of their newly acquired workers. Many Africans were at least nominally Christian, having been baptized before capture, and some of their owners undertook the responsibility for further religious instruction, primarily to insure their passivity and stamp out native tendencies as quickly as possible. One element which survived and perhaps even enlivened the culture clashes was humor. European settlers, Native Americans and Africans retained the right to laugh at each other through the painful transitions all endured. Although none of the groups were homogeneous, there tended to be a seamless blending when faced with members of the outlying groups. Settlers, in this case, were of such a variety of original nationalities, all with preconceived notions of each other, that any sort of unity seemed impossible. Yet, when confronted with the wildly dissimilar cultures of the African or the Native American, a definable alliance was born. This ethnocentrism-- \"us\" against \"them\"--was the basis for the rich variety of ethnic humor which abounded at the time. Tempestuous and troubling issues: guilt, superiority and insecurity were often played out on the miniature stage of the popular joke. These conflicts exposed a disparity of image when it came to the Europeans' view of the Native Americans and Africans. Although the European colonists viewed Native Americans and Africans differently, at face value their cultural situation was similar. Neither the Native American nor the African spoke the white man's language. Both had intact cultures when the white man thrust himself upon them, causing each to alter his values. And yet, initially, the Native Americans were perceived as possessing desirable qualities, whereas the native Africans never had this advantage. As late as 1922, these perceived differences lingered, as seen in The Planters of Colonial Virginia. Speaking of their usefulness to the Virginia planters, Native Americans are described thusly: To hunt them out of their native lairs and bind them to arduous and ignominious service was hardly to be thought of. Their spirit was too proud to be thus broken, the safe refuge of the woods too near at hand. One might well have attempted to hitch lions and tigers to the plough shaft, as to place these wild children of the forest at the handles. This wonderful, intangible immunity doesn't extend to the African, however: Born in savagery, unacquainted with the English tongue, knowing little of agriculture, it was a matter of some difficulty to accustom himself to his task in the tobacco fields. yet when his lesson had been learned, when a few years of experience had taught him what his master expected him to do, the slave showed himself adequate to the requirements of one staple crop. …","PeriodicalId":83125,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Negro history","volume":"85 1","pages":"300 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2668548","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Negro history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2668548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ann Maydosz [*] The "New Found Land," [1] as America was called by Thomas Harriot, one of the continent's first ethnographers, opened a Pandora's box of troubles for the Englishmen who landed there. Confounded by their unpreparedness for life there, they quickly discovered that unfamiliar terrain was an almost insurmountable obstacle. Yet, their eyes told them that people could thrive, even prosper there. Initially native societies evoked an awe born not just of curiosity about these newly discovered humans, but of necessity because the Native Americans' survival skills towered over the European settlers'. Eventually the transplanted Europeans were able to overcome their ineptness and led by the Native Americans, as chronicled by Harriot in his book A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia, began to carve out a life on the new continent. The European settlers' relationship with the Africans they encountered, though, suffered none of the self-doubt which infected first meetings with the Native Americans. Although Native Americans were also used as slaves, to the eyes of needy European colonists, the Africans held only one status: a conscriptable labor force. The owners of African slaves had no need or interest in learning the native culture of their newly acquired workers. Many Africans were at least nominally Christian, having been baptized before capture, and some of their owners undertook the responsibility for further religious instruction, primarily to insure their passivity and stamp out native tendencies as quickly as possible. One element which survived and perhaps even enlivened the culture clashes was humor. European settlers, Native Americans and Africans retained the right to laugh at each other through the painful transitions all endured. Although none of the groups were homogeneous, there tended to be a seamless blending when faced with members of the outlying groups. Settlers, in this case, were of such a variety of original nationalities, all with preconceived notions of each other, that any sort of unity seemed impossible. Yet, when confronted with the wildly dissimilar cultures of the African or the Native American, a definable alliance was born. This ethnocentrism-- "us" against "them"--was the basis for the rich variety of ethnic humor which abounded at the time. Tempestuous and troubling issues: guilt, superiority and insecurity were often played out on the miniature stage of the popular joke. These conflicts exposed a disparity of image when it came to the Europeans' view of the Native Americans and Africans. Although the European colonists viewed Native Americans and Africans differently, at face value their cultural situation was similar. Neither the Native American nor the African spoke the white man's language. Both had intact cultures when the white man thrust himself upon them, causing each to alter his values. And yet, initially, the Native Americans were perceived as possessing desirable qualities, whereas the native Africans never had this advantage. As late as 1922, these perceived differences lingered, as seen in The Planters of Colonial Virginia. Speaking of their usefulness to the Virginia planters, Native Americans are described thusly: To hunt them out of their native lairs and bind them to arduous and ignominious service was hardly to be thought of. Their spirit was too proud to be thus broken, the safe refuge of the woods too near at hand. One might well have attempted to hitch lions and tigers to the plough shaft, as to place these wild children of the forest at the handles. This wonderful, intangible immunity doesn't extend to the African, however: Born in savagery, unacquainted with the English tongue, knowing little of agriculture, it was a matter of some difficulty to accustom himself to his task in the tobacco fields. yet when his lesson had been learned, when a few years of experience had taught him what his master expected him to do, the slave showed himself adequate to the requirements of one staple crop. …
红与黑:美国殖民时期的民族幽默
“新发现的土地”——美洲大陆最早的人种学家之一托马斯·哈里奥特把美洲称为“新发现的土地”——为登陆那里的英国人打开了一个充满麻烦的潘多拉魔盒。由于对那里的生活毫无准备,他们很快发现,陌生的地形几乎是一个无法逾越的障碍。然而,他们的眼睛告诉他们,人们可以在那里茁壮成长,甚至繁荣昌盛。最初,土著社会唤起了一种敬畏,这不仅仅是对这些新发现的人类的好奇,也是必要的,因为美洲原住民的生存技能远远超过了欧洲定居者。最终,移植的欧洲人克服了他们的无能,并在印第安人的带领下,开始在新大陆上开拓生活,正如哈里奥特在他的书《弗吉尼亚新发现土地的简要和真实报告》中所记载的那样。然而,欧洲定居者与他们所遇到的非洲人的关系并没有像第一次与美洲原住民接触时那样受到自我怀疑的影响。虽然印第安人也被当作奴隶,但在贫穷的欧洲殖民者看来,非洲人只有一种身份:被征召的劳动力。非洲奴隶的主人既不需要也没有兴趣学习他们新雇佣的工人的本土文化。许多非洲人至少在名义上是基督徒,他们在被俘前受过洗礼,他们的一些主人承担了进一步宗教教育的责任,主要是为了确保他们的被动,并尽快消除土著倾向。在文化冲突中幸存下来甚至活跃起来的一个因素是幽默。欧洲移民、美洲原住民和非洲人在经历了痛苦的转变后,都保留了互相嘲笑的权利。虽然没有一个群体是同质的,但当面对外围群体的成员时,往往会有一种无缝的融合。在这种情况下,定居者来自各种各样的原始民族,他们都对彼此有着先入为主的观念,任何形式的统一似乎都是不可能的。然而,当面对截然不同的非洲文化或美洲原住民文化时,一个明确的联盟诞生了。这种种族中心主义——“我们”反对“他们”——是当时丰富多样的种族幽默的基础。激烈而令人不安的问题:内疚、优越感和不安全感,经常在流行笑话的小舞台上上演。这些冲突暴露了欧洲人对美洲原住民和非洲人的不同看法。虽然欧洲殖民者对美洲原住民和非洲人的看法不同,但从表面上看,他们的文化状况是相似的。印第安人和非洲人都不会说白人的语言。当白人强行闯入他们的世界时,他们都有完整的文化,导致他们各自改变了自己的价值观。然而,一开始,美洲原住民被认为拥有令人向往的品质,而非洲原住民从未有过这种优势。直到1922年,这些感知到的差异仍然存在,正如在《弗吉尼亚殖民地的种植园主》中所看到的那样。在谈到他们对弗吉尼亚种植园主的用处时,人们是这样描述印第安人的:把他们从自己的巢穴中追捕出来,让他们做艰苦而不光彩的工作,这是很难想象的。他们的精神太骄傲了,不能被这样击垮,因为森林的安全避难所近在咫尺。人们很可能试图把狮子和老虎套在犁杆上,把这些森林里的野孩子放在手柄上。然而,这种奇妙的、无形的免疫力并不适用于非洲人:他出生在野蛮地区,不懂英语,对农业知之甚少,要让自己适应烟草田的工作是一件很困难的事情。然而,当他吸取了教训,当几年的经验教会了他主人期望他做的事情时,奴隶表现出自己足以满足一种主要作物的要求。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信