"A Question Which Convulses a Nation": The Early Republic's Greatest Debate About the Judicial Review Power

IF 3.5 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Harvard Law Review Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI:10.2307/4093462

Theodore W. Ruger

{"title":"\"A Question Which Convulses a Nation\": The Early Republic's Greatest Debate About the Judicial Review Power","authors":"Theodore W. Ruger","doi":"10.2307/4093462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I. CONTEXT AND CHRONOLOGY ...... 835 A. The Political Culture and Legal Landscape of Early-Nineteenth-Century Kentucky... 836 I. \"Steady to the principles of pure republicanism\" 836 2. \"The laws of Virginia for the appropriation of lands were the greatest curse that ever befell Kentucky\" 839 B. The Crisis Unfolds 844 . The Triggering D ecision 845 2. Removal and Reorganization 849 3. Response and Retrenchment 852 II. POWER, LEGITIMACY, AND CONSTITUTIONALISM .... 855 A. Competing Structural Theories of Sovereignty 857 i. Questions of Representation ........ 857 2. \"[I]n ... a multiplicity of checks the freedom of the whole will be safe\" 862 3. \"Aristocrats\" and \"Farmers\" 865 B. The Locus and Methodology of Constitutional Interpretation 869 i. The New Court's Populist View of Constitutionalism . 870 (a) Judicial Illegitimacy and Incompetency in Constitutional Interpretation 870 (b) \"That little book\": Implications of Writtenness for Popular Constitutional Theory 871 2. The Old-Court Party's Moderate Judicial Constitutionalism 874 III. RAMIFICATIONS ACROSS GEOGRAPHY, TIME, AND THEORY 877 A. Insights Regarding Marbury's Influence and the Opinions of National Leaders ......... 879 I. \"Marberry and Madison ... [an] unhappy citation[]\" . 879 2. The Views of National Leaders 881 B. Influences on Judicial Behavior and Andrew Jackson's Constitutionalism 884 I. Judicial Behavior 884 2. Jackson's Constitutionalism 886 C. Broader Historical and Theoretical Lessons 888 i. Recent Scholarship Assessing Conceptions of Judicial Review in the Early Republic 888 2. A n U ncertain C onsensus 892 3. The Public's Constitutional Moment 894 4. Taming the Judges 896","PeriodicalId":48320,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4093462","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4093462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Abstract

I. CONTEXT AND CHRONOLOGY ...... 835 A. The Political Culture and Legal Landscape of Early-Nineteenth-Century Kentucky... 836 I. "Steady to the principles of pure republicanism" 836 2. "The laws of Virginia for the appropriation of lands were the greatest curse that ever befell Kentucky" 839 B. The Crisis Unfolds 844 . The Triggering D ecision 845 2. Removal and Reorganization 849 3. Response and Retrenchment 852 II. POWER, LEGITIMACY, AND CONSTITUTIONALISM .... 855 A. Competing Structural Theories of Sovereignty 857 i. Questions of Representation ........ 857 2. "[I]n ... a multiplicity of checks the freedom of the whole will be safe" 862 3. "Aristocrats" and "Farmers" 865 B. The Locus and Methodology of Constitutional Interpretation 869 i. The New Court's Populist View of Constitutionalism . 870 (a) Judicial Illegitimacy and Incompetency in Constitutional Interpretation 870 (b) "That little book": Implications of Writtenness for Popular Constitutional Theory 871 2. The Old-Court Party's Moderate Judicial Constitutionalism 874 III. RAMIFICATIONS ACROSS GEOGRAPHY, TIME, AND THEORY 877 A. Insights Regarding Marbury's Influence and the Opinions of National Leaders ......... 879 I. "Marberry and Madison ... [an] unhappy citation[]" . 879 2. The Views of National Leaders 881 B. Influences on Judicial Behavior and Andrew Jackson's Constitutionalism 884 I. Judicial Behavior 884 2. Jackson's Constitutionalism 886 C. Broader Historical and Theoretical Lessons 888 i. Recent Scholarship Assessing Conceptions of Judicial Review in the Early Republic 888 2. A n U ncertain C onsensus 892 3. The Public's Constitutional Moment 894 4. Taming the Judges 896

查看原文本刊更多论文

“一个惊动国家的问题”:共和初期关于司法审查权的最大争论

1 .背景和年代......835 A。19世纪早期肯塔基州的政治文化和法律景观……836我。“坚持纯粹共和主义的原则”“弗吉尼亚关于土地征用的法律是肯塔基有史以来最大的诅咒”839 B.危机展开。触发D决定845。离职和重组回应与缩减权力、合法性和宪政....855 A。主权的竞争结构理论857 i.代表性问题........857 2。“[我]n…多重检查使整体的自由是安全的。“贵族”与“农民”B.宪法解释的轨迹与方法论1 .新法院的民粹主义立宪观(a)宪法解释的司法非法性和不胜任性“那本小书”:写作对大众宪法理论的影响[71]。旧法院党的温和司法立宪主义[j]跨越地理、时间和理论的影响。关于马布里的影响和国家领导人意见的见解.........879我。“马贝里和麦迪逊……不愉快的引用[]”。879 2。B.对司法行为的影响与安德鲁·杰克逊的宪政主义[84]B.司法行为[84]杰克逊的立宪主义更广泛的历史和理论教训最近的学术研究评估共和早期的司法审查概念【正确答案】C。1994年公众的宪法时刻驯服法官

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Harvard Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

11.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations. Aside from serving as an important academic forum for legal scholarship, the Review has two other goals. First, the journal is designed to be an effective research tool for practicing lawyers and students of the law. Second, it provides opportunities for Review members to develop their own editing and writing skills. Accordingly, each issue contains pieces by student editors as well as outside authors. The Review publishes articles by professors, judges, and practitioners and solicits reviews of important recent books from recognized experts. All articles — even those by the most respected authorities — are subjected to a rigorous editorial process designed to sharpen and strengthen substance and tone.