AN ANALYSIS OF SELF-REGULATED LEARNING ON MATHEMATICS EDUCATION STUDENT FKIP UNDANA

D. D. Samo
{"title":"AN ANALYSIS OF SELF-REGULATED LEARNING ON MATHEMATICS EDUCATION STUDENT FKIP UNDANA","authors":"D. D. Samo","doi":"10.22460/infinity.v5i2.p67-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to explore the differences among self regulating learning aspect of math education students-FKIP Undana involving three groups of students which are the first level (the first semester), second level (fifth semester) and third level (ninth semesters) students to review the ability of the individual. The samples included 167 students that consist of 60 students of the first level (18 with high ability; 27 with average ability and 15 with low ability), 64 students of the second level (16 with high ability, 30 with average ability and 18 with low ability) and 43 students of the third level (6 with high ability, 24 with average ability and 13 with low ability). This research is a survey research. The data collection is done by distributing questionnaires on self-regulated learning to those three groups. SRL questionnaire consists of 10 aspects, goal setting, motivation, learning difficulties analysis, self-efficacy, election strategies, meta cognition, resource management, performance evaluation, evaluation of the understanding, and self-satisfaction. Two-way ANOVA was utilized in the data analysis of this study. The results of the analysis showed that, the first level group is more excellent in SRL than two other levels. In a review of capabilities, the average comparison of all three groups showed that the average-ability students excel both the high and low-ability students in SRL.","PeriodicalId":31175,"journal":{"name":"Infinity","volume":"5 1","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infinity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v5i2.p67-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This research aims to explore the differences among self regulating learning aspect of math education students-FKIP Undana involving three groups of students which are the first level (the first semester), second level (fifth semester) and third level (ninth semesters) students to review the ability of the individual. The samples included 167 students that consist of 60 students of the first level (18 with high ability; 27 with average ability and 15 with low ability), 64 students of the second level (16 with high ability, 30 with average ability and 18 with low ability) and 43 students of the third level (6 with high ability, 24 with average ability and 13 with low ability). This research is a survey research. The data collection is done by distributing questionnaires on self-regulated learning to those three groups. SRL questionnaire consists of 10 aspects, goal setting, motivation, learning difficulties analysis, self-efficacy, election strategies, meta cognition, resource management, performance evaluation, evaluation of the understanding, and self-satisfaction. Two-way ANOVA was utilized in the data analysis of this study. The results of the analysis showed that, the first level group is more excellent in SRL than two other levels. In a review of capabilities, the average comparison of all three groups showed that the average-ability students excel both the high and low-ability students in SRL.
数学教育学生自主学习的分析
本研究旨在探讨fkip数学教育学生自我调节学习方面的差异,涉及三组学生:第一阶段(第一学期),第二阶段(第五学期)和第三阶段(第九学期)的学生,以评估个人的能力。样本包括167名学生,其中60名为一级学生(18名为高水平学生;中等能力27人,低能力15人),第二级64人(高能力16人,中等能力30人,低能力18人),第三级43人(高能力6人,中等能力24人,低能力13人)。本研究是一项调查研究。数据收集是通过向这三个组分发关于自我调节学习的问卷来完成的。SRL问卷包括目标设定、动机、学习困难分析、自我效能感、选举策略、元认知、资源管理、绩效评价、理解评价、自我满意度等10个方面。本研究资料分析采用双因素方差分析。分析结果表明,第一水平组在SRL方面优于其他两个水平组。在能力的回顾中,三组的平均比较表明,平均能力的学生在SRL上优于高能力和低能力的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信