(Re)Framing the Historiography of the Hiatus

Fabrício da Silva Henriques, Gabriela Coelho Santos, Lucas Daniel Chaves de Freitas
{"title":"(Re)Framing the Historiography of the Hiatus","authors":"Fabrício da Silva Henriques, Gabriela Coelho Santos, Lucas Daniel Chaves de Freitas","doi":"10.22456/2317-8558.128822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The book “Cold War and International law” represents a great effort in presenting a different view in the historiography of international law about this important period of the 20th Century. The purpose of this paper is to engage with the proposal of the editors and reflect upon the issues arising from the traditional portray of the “Cold War”, although offering what could be a fourth perspective on the subject: that of the establishment of “development” as an argumentative pattern in international law. In a dialog with another recent work with special relevance to the history of International Law – Ntina Tzouvala’s “Capitalism as Civilisation” – we revisit some of the essays presented in the book to illustrate the thesis that an attention to the uses of the concept of “development” can be central to an account of this period that goes beyond the East-West feud, leaving a profound legacy in contemporary accounts of Law. By shedding light on perspectives once overlooked, the book shows how the Cold War can be analyzed as a moment of prolific development of standards of domination. The struggle for the Global South was much more than a dispute for military sway or political influence through international institutions, it also encompassed a refined project of creating concepts and a new perspective in international law that permitted the consolidation of political asymmetry through juridical institutions. \nKEYWORDS: Cold War. International Law. Global South.","PeriodicalId":53362,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos do Programa de PosGraduacao em Direito - PPGDirUFRGS","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos do Programa de PosGraduacao em Direito - PPGDirUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2317-8558.128822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The book “Cold War and International law” represents a great effort in presenting a different view in the historiography of international law about this important period of the 20th Century. The purpose of this paper is to engage with the proposal of the editors and reflect upon the issues arising from the traditional portray of the “Cold War”, although offering what could be a fourth perspective on the subject: that of the establishment of “development” as an argumentative pattern in international law. In a dialog with another recent work with special relevance to the history of International Law – Ntina Tzouvala’s “Capitalism as Civilisation” – we revisit some of the essays presented in the book to illustrate the thesis that an attention to the uses of the concept of “development” can be central to an account of this period that goes beyond the East-West feud, leaving a profound legacy in contemporary accounts of Law. By shedding light on perspectives once overlooked, the book shows how the Cold War can be analyzed as a moment of prolific development of standards of domination. The struggle for the Global South was much more than a dispute for military sway or political influence through international institutions, it also encompassed a refined project of creating concepts and a new perspective in international law that permitted the consolidation of political asymmetry through juridical institutions. KEYWORDS: Cold War. International Law. Global South.
(二)重新建构裂谷的史学
《冷战与国际法》一书是国际法史学对20世纪这一重要时期提出不同观点的一种努力。本文的目的是参与编辑的建议,并反思传统的“冷战”描绘所产生的问题,尽管提供了关于该主题的第四种观点:将“发展”确立为国际法的论证模式。在与最近另一本与国际法历史特别相关的著作——Ntina Tzouvala的《作为文明的资本主义》的对话中,我们重新审视了书中提出的一些文章,以说明对“发展”概念的使用的关注可以成为对这一时期的描述的核心,超越了东西方的争执,在当代法律的描述中留下了深刻的遗产。通过揭示曾经被忽视的观点,这本书展示了如何将冷战分析为统治标准多产发展的时刻。全球南方的斗争不仅仅是一场通过国际机构争夺军事支配或政治影响力的争端,它还包括一项精致的工程,即在国际法中创造概念和新视角,从而允许通过司法机构巩固政治不对称。关键词:冷战。国际法。南半球。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信