The political economy of human rights

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Tim Anderson
{"title":"The political economy of human rights","authors":"Tim Anderson","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt18fsb9g.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary political economy can make an important contribution to the human rights debates which have come to dominate political relations over the past half century. These debates hide a wide variety of political agendas. Rights arguments often indicate ethical deficiencies, and sometimes help adjudicate social disputes but not always. Defming rights does not necessarily resolve and may even aggravate social conflicts (Ignatieff 2000: 16). Further, an abstract portrayal of formal, individual rights may obscure actual rights in a particular social situation. At the same time, human rights have become a unique moral and political consensus. Dictators and democrats alike now rely on some variant of rights arguments, as the touchstone of their political legitimacy. This, of course, only adds to the confusion of meanings.","PeriodicalId":43895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Australian Political Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Australian Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18fsb9g.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Contemporary political economy can make an important contribution to the human rights debates which have come to dominate political relations over the past half century. These debates hide a wide variety of political agendas. Rights arguments often indicate ethical deficiencies, and sometimes help adjudicate social disputes but not always. Defming rights does not necessarily resolve and may even aggravate social conflicts (Ignatieff 2000: 16). Further, an abstract portrayal of formal, individual rights may obscure actual rights in a particular social situation. At the same time, human rights have become a unique moral and political consensus. Dictators and democrats alike now rely on some variant of rights arguments, as the touchstone of their political legitimacy. This, of course, only adds to the confusion of meanings.
人权的政治经济学
当代政治经济学可以对过去半个世纪以来主导政治关系的人权辩论作出重要贡献。这些辩论背后隐藏着各种各样的政治议程。关于权利的争论往往表明道德上的缺陷,有时有助于裁决社会纠纷,但并非总是如此。界定权利并不一定能解决甚至可能加剧社会冲突(Ignatieff 2000: 16)。此外,对正式的个人权利的抽象描述可能会模糊特定社会情况下的实际权利。与此同时,人权已成为一种独特的道德和政治共识。独裁者和民主派现在都依赖于一些权利论点的变体,作为其政治合法性的试金石。当然,这只会增加含义的混乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信