[Retooling the Welfare State: What's Right, What's Wrong, What's to Be Done?]

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Richards, J. Graham, Louise Q. Querido
{"title":"[Retooling the Welfare State: What's Right, What's Wrong, What's to Be Done?]","authors":"J. Richards, J. Graham, Louise Q. Querido","doi":"10.2307/3552023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canadian Social Welfare in the Twenty-First CenturyJohn R. Graham and Louise M. QueridoJohn Richards. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute, 1997. 304 pp.Over the past generation, the Canadian welfare state has undergone a radical transformation. Principles of universality, nurtured during and after the Second World War, have been superseded in the 1980s and 1990s by selective programmes that target benefits according to need. Contemporary social programmes are also decreasingly comprehensive, and governments' willingness to provide a reliable funding base, likewise, has been diminished. As well, political leaders have attempted to transfer social welfare responsibility to other levels of government. Ottawa has downloaded responsibility to the provinces, or in some instances directly to municipal jurisdictions, and the provinces have downloaded more fiscal and administrative responsibilities to municipalities. All levels of government, in turn, have hoped for - and in many cases systematically sought - an increased role for non-governmental authorities - social service organizations, religious groups and community and neighbourhood groups. If these fail, default rests with those families capable of providing support. Not surprisingly, holes in the social safety net are apparent. Those experiencing these changes directly and those working on the front lines of social services can attest to the profound - and to many, the present reviewers among them, unnecessary - suffering that many Canadians experience regularly. Shelters for the homeless in major urban centres are well beyond capacity, and the homeless are increasingly apparent in downtown cores.(1) Underresourced homes for the aged provide less care for those unable to care for themselves (Lightman). Programmes such as Employment Insurance provide decreasingly comprehensive benefits to a shrinking proportion of the country's unemployed.(2) In 1995, Statistics Canada announced a 58 per cent increase in childhood poverty over the previous six years, and a total of 1.4 million Canadian children living below the poverty line (Canadian Council on Social Development). These and dozens of other social problems highlight contemporary social-policy-related problems.At least part of the underlying logic for changes to contemporary social policies has been ideological, with the rise in the 1980s of neo-conservative politics and the apparent flattening of the ideological spectrum in that decade and the years since. Part of the logic has been fiscal, with burgeoning government debt and deficits creating a rationale for reductions in certain government spending commitments - social welfare especially. Part, as well, has been the rise of a new international capitalism, sometimes referred to under a broader rubric of \"globalization.\" Free-market forces and privatization prevail, transnational corporations are seemingly freed from a sense of national responsibility, and environmental policy, workplace conditions, job security, wages and social policies appear to be determined less by national policy and more by the market-driven forces of an increasingly international and competitive industrializing world.But as social welfare policies are commensurately transformed, is there, one wonders, any coherent vision of how things should be? Where are today's equivalents of those systematic blueprints that ushered in the post-Second World War, comprehensive welfare state that we once knew? In Great Britain, William Beveridge released his famous 1942 report, Social Insurance and Allied Services. In Canada, Leonard Marsh wrote a document similar in intent and scope, Report on Social Security for Canada (1943). These, in turn, were preceded by royal commissions, academic research and by reports for governments written by numerous commentators. There was logic to the universal welfare state, and a corpus of thinking to inform this logic.The books under review may one day be a basis for a comprehensive view of earlytwenty-first-century social policies. …","PeriodicalId":45057,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","volume":"35 1","pages":"297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3552023","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3552023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Canadian Social Welfare in the Twenty-First CenturyJohn R. Graham and Louise M. QueridoJohn Richards. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute, 1997. 304 pp.Over the past generation, the Canadian welfare state has undergone a radical transformation. Principles of universality, nurtured during and after the Second World War, have been superseded in the 1980s and 1990s by selective programmes that target benefits according to need. Contemporary social programmes are also decreasingly comprehensive, and governments' willingness to provide a reliable funding base, likewise, has been diminished. As well, political leaders have attempted to transfer social welfare responsibility to other levels of government. Ottawa has downloaded responsibility to the provinces, or in some instances directly to municipal jurisdictions, and the provinces have downloaded more fiscal and administrative responsibilities to municipalities. All levels of government, in turn, have hoped for - and in many cases systematically sought - an increased role for non-governmental authorities - social service organizations, religious groups and community and neighbourhood groups. If these fail, default rests with those families capable of providing support. Not surprisingly, holes in the social safety net are apparent. Those experiencing these changes directly and those working on the front lines of social services can attest to the profound - and to many, the present reviewers among them, unnecessary - suffering that many Canadians experience regularly. Shelters for the homeless in major urban centres are well beyond capacity, and the homeless are increasingly apparent in downtown cores.(1) Underresourced homes for the aged provide less care for those unable to care for themselves (Lightman). Programmes such as Employment Insurance provide decreasingly comprehensive benefits to a shrinking proportion of the country's unemployed.(2) In 1995, Statistics Canada announced a 58 per cent increase in childhood poverty over the previous six years, and a total of 1.4 million Canadian children living below the poverty line (Canadian Council on Social Development). These and dozens of other social problems highlight contemporary social-policy-related problems.At least part of the underlying logic for changes to contemporary social policies has been ideological, with the rise in the 1980s of neo-conservative politics and the apparent flattening of the ideological spectrum in that decade and the years since. Part of the logic has been fiscal, with burgeoning government debt and deficits creating a rationale for reductions in certain government spending commitments - social welfare especially. Part, as well, has been the rise of a new international capitalism, sometimes referred to under a broader rubric of "globalization." Free-market forces and privatization prevail, transnational corporations are seemingly freed from a sense of national responsibility, and environmental policy, workplace conditions, job security, wages and social policies appear to be determined less by national policy and more by the market-driven forces of an increasingly international and competitive industrializing world.But as social welfare policies are commensurately transformed, is there, one wonders, any coherent vision of how things should be? Where are today's equivalents of those systematic blueprints that ushered in the post-Second World War, comprehensive welfare state that we once knew? In Great Britain, William Beveridge released his famous 1942 report, Social Insurance and Allied Services. In Canada, Leonard Marsh wrote a document similar in intent and scope, Report on Social Security for Canada (1943). These, in turn, were preceded by royal commissions, academic research and by reports for governments written by numerous commentators. There was logic to the universal welfare state, and a corpus of thinking to inform this logic.The books under review may one day be a basis for a comprehensive view of earlytwenty-first-century social policies. …
重组福利国家:什么是对的,什么是错的,该怎么做?]
《21世纪的加拿大社会福利》,作者:john R. Graham和Louise M. QueridoJohn Richards。多伦多:C.D. Howe研究所,1997。在过去的一代人里,加拿大的福利制度经历了彻底的转变。在第二次世界大战期间和之后形成的普遍性原则在1980年代和1990年代已被针对需要的利益的选择性方案所取代。当代社会方案也越来越不全面,同样,政府提供可靠资金基础的意愿也在减弱。此外,政治领导人也试图将社会福利责任转移到其他各级政府。渥太华将责任下放给各省,或在某些情况下直接下放给市级管辖,而各省则将更多的财政和行政责任下放给市政当局。反过来,各级政府希望- -在许多情况下系统地寻求- -非政府当局- -社会服务组织、宗教团体、社区和邻里团体发挥更大的作用。如果这些计划失败,违约将由那些有能力提供支持的家庭承担。毫不奇怪,社会保障网络的漏洞是显而易见的。那些直接经历这些变化的人和那些在社会服务第一线工作的人可以证明,许多加拿大人经常经历的痛苦是深刻的- -对许多人来说,包括目前的审查人员在内,是不必要的。主要城市中心为无家可归者提供的庇护所远远超出了容量,而在市中心的核心,无家可归者越来越明显。(1)资源不足的养老院对那些无法自理的人提供的照顾越来越少(莱特曼)。(2) 1995年,加拿大统计局宣布,在过去六年中,儿童贫困增加了58%,总共有140万加拿大儿童生活在贫困线以下(加拿大社会发展委员会)。这些以及其他几十个社会问题凸显了当代社会政策相关问题。随着20世纪80年代新保守主义政治的兴起,以及在那十年和之后的几年里,意识形态光谱的明显扁平化,至少当代社会政策变化的部分潜在逻辑是意识形态的。部分逻辑是财政方面的,不断增长的政府债务和赤字为削减某些政府支出承诺——尤其是社会福利——创造了理由。部分原因是新的国际资本主义的兴起,有时被称为更广泛的“全球化”。自由市场力量和私有化占上风,跨国公司似乎摆脱了国家责任感,环境政策、工作场所条件、工作保障、工资和社会政策似乎更少地由国家政策决定,而更多地由日益国际化和竞争性的工业化世界的市场驱动力量决定。但是,随着社会福利政策的相应转变,人们不禁要问,对于事情应该如何发展,是否存在任何连贯的愿景?我们曾经熟悉的、引领二战后全面福利国家的那些系统性蓝图,今天的对等物在哪里?在英国,威廉·贝弗里奇于1942年发表了他著名的报告《社会保险和联合服务》。在加拿大,伦纳德·马什(Leonard Marsh)写了一份意图和范围类似的文件——《加拿大社会安全报告》(1943)。而在这之前,皇家委员会、学术研究和众多评论员为政府撰写的报告都先于这些报告。普遍福利国家是有逻辑的,并且有大量的思想为这个逻辑提供信息。这些书也许有一天会成为二十一世纪早期社会政策综合观点的基础。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信