How China's Nationalism was Shanghaied

Lucian W. Pye
{"title":"How China's Nationalism was Shanghaied","authors":"Lucian W. Pye","doi":"10.2307/2949954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What kind of a nation-state are the Chinese people and their leaders shaping for themselves as they enter the second century of the 'Chinese revolution'? The quest for national greatness and modernization that began with the early reformers as a quest for 'wealth and power' continues. The relationship of nationalism and modernization is unquestionably a fundamental problem in the history of modem China. Indeed, one can ask whether there is any theme about China that is more hackneyed than 'nationalism and modernization?' What can possibly be said that is new on the subject? What is new is the urgency of the question because we are now seeing, as a part of the worldwide crisis of communism, the unrelenting erosion of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought as the basis of state legitimacy in China. The expectation is that nationalism will have to fill the void created by the 'crisis of confidence' and by the collapse of the myth of socialism as magic. If the future of China lies with nationalism, we had better get a clear understanding of precisely what are the characteristics of Chinese nationalism. What are likely to be the distinctive features of Chinese nationalism in a postMarxist-Leninist era? More importantly, how will the configurations of Chinese nationalism affect the prospects for the modemization of Chinese society and politics? It is my intention to argue, first, that the relationship between nationalism and modernization has taken a form in China that is different from what occurred anywhere else. I want to argue, secondly, that in spite of the greatness of Chinese history, in spite of the manifest durability of everyday Chinese culture that is, in spite of the weight of many of the standard building blocks of nationalism the historical pattern of China's","PeriodicalId":85646,"journal":{"name":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","volume":"1 1","pages":"107 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2949954","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2949954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

What kind of a nation-state are the Chinese people and their leaders shaping for themselves as they enter the second century of the 'Chinese revolution'? The quest for national greatness and modernization that began with the early reformers as a quest for 'wealth and power' continues. The relationship of nationalism and modernization is unquestionably a fundamental problem in the history of modem China. Indeed, one can ask whether there is any theme about China that is more hackneyed than 'nationalism and modernization?' What can possibly be said that is new on the subject? What is new is the urgency of the question because we are now seeing, as a part of the worldwide crisis of communism, the unrelenting erosion of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought as the basis of state legitimacy in China. The expectation is that nationalism will have to fill the void created by the 'crisis of confidence' and by the collapse of the myth of socialism as magic. If the future of China lies with nationalism, we had better get a clear understanding of precisely what are the characteristics of Chinese nationalism. What are likely to be the distinctive features of Chinese nationalism in a postMarxist-Leninist era? More importantly, how will the configurations of Chinese nationalism affect the prospects for the modemization of Chinese society and politics? It is my intention to argue, first, that the relationship between nationalism and modernization has taken a form in China that is different from what occurred anywhere else. I want to argue, secondly, that in spite of the greatness of Chinese history, in spite of the manifest durability of everyday Chinese culture that is, in spite of the weight of many of the standard building blocks of nationalism the historical pattern of China's
中国的民族主义是如何被上海化的
当中国人民和他们的领导人进入“中国革命”的第二个世纪时,他们正在为自己塑造一个什么样的民族国家?从早期改革者开始的对国家强大和现代化的追求,即对“财富和权力”的追求,仍在继续。民族主义与现代化的关系无疑是中国近代史上的一个根本性问题。的确,有人会问,关于中国,还有什么比“民族主义和现代化”更陈腐的主题吗?在这个问题上还能说些什么新东西呢?人们预计,民族主义将不得不填补“信任危机”和社会主义神话崩溃所造成的空白。如果民族主义决定着中国的未来,我们最好准确地认识中国民族主义的特征是什么。在后马列主义时代,中国民族主义有哪些显著特征?更重要的是,中国民族主义的形态将如何影响中国社会和政治的现代化前景?我想说的是,首先,民族主义和现代化之间的关系在中国的表现形式不同于其他任何地方。其次,我想说的是,尽管中国历史悠久,尽管中国日常文化具有明显的持久性,也就是说,尽管民族主义的许多标准构成要素都很重要,但中国的历史模式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信