Pill side effects, continuation found similar whether self-prescribed or prescribed by doctor.

{"title":"Pill side effects, continuation found similar whether self-prescribed or prescribed by doctor.","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/2948176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In developing countries, especially Latin America, women obtain oral contraceptives without a physician's prescription. While these women experience more side effects, they have fewer accidental pregnancies than women who obtain the pills through a physician/prescription. A probability sample of 6692 Colombian women in Bogota were interviewed in 1974. Almost 1 in 20 of all women, and almost 1 in 13 of those married or living in a union, said they began using the pill on their own as their first method of contraception. The characteristics of the women without prescriptions were similar to those with, but self-prescribers were slightly older, had more children, and were less educated. 7 in 10 women of both groups continued pill use for 1 year; about 6 in 10 still used the pill after 2 years. Both groups gave side effects as their reason for discontinuation. The most frequently cited side effect was headache. None of the women reported the more serious complications, thrombophlebitis and thromboembolism. Women who did not begin with medical advice were less likely to seek it when they had side effects attributed to the pill. Half as many self-prescribers (24%), as users with a prescription (46%), reported visiting a private physician about side effects. 11% self-prescribers, compared with 25%, sought other professional help.","PeriodicalId":76914,"journal":{"name":"International family planning digest","volume":"2 3 1","pages":"13-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2948176","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International family planning digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2948176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In developing countries, especially Latin America, women obtain oral contraceptives without a physician's prescription. While these women experience more side effects, they have fewer accidental pregnancies than women who obtain the pills through a physician/prescription. A probability sample of 6692 Colombian women in Bogota were interviewed in 1974. Almost 1 in 20 of all women, and almost 1 in 13 of those married or living in a union, said they began using the pill on their own as their first method of contraception. The characteristics of the women without prescriptions were similar to those with, but self-prescribers were slightly older, had more children, and were less educated. 7 in 10 women of both groups continued pill use for 1 year; about 6 in 10 still used the pill after 2 years. Both groups gave side effects as their reason for discontinuation. The most frequently cited side effect was headache. None of the women reported the more serious complications, thrombophlebitis and thromboembolism. Women who did not begin with medical advice were less likely to seek it when they had side effects attributed to the pill. Half as many self-prescribers (24%), as users with a prescription (46%), reported visiting a private physician about side effects. 11% self-prescribers, compared with 25%, sought other professional help.
药物的副作用,持续服用发现无论是自处方还是医生处方相似。
在发展中国家,特别是拉丁美洲,妇女无需医生处方即可获得口服避孕药。虽然这些女性会经历更多的副作用,但与通过医生/处方获得避孕药的女性相比,她们意外怀孕的几率更低。1974年在波哥大采访了6692名哥伦比亚妇女的概率样本。近1 / 20的女性,以及近1 / 13的已婚或同居女性表示,她们开始自行使用避孕药作为第一种避孕方法。没有处方的女性的特征与有处方的女性相似,但自开处方的女性年龄稍大,子女较多,受教育程度较低。两组中10名妇女中有7名继续服用1年;大约60%的人在两年后仍在服用避孕药。两组都把副作用作为停药的原因。最常见的副作用是头痛。没有妇女报告更严重的并发症,血栓性静脉炎和血栓栓塞。那些一开始没有接受医疗建议的女性,当她们发现避孕药有副作用时,就不太可能去寻求医疗建议。自开处方者(24%)和有处方者(46%)的一半报告因副作用去看私人医生。11%的自我处方者寻求其他专业帮助,而25%的人寻求其他专业帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信