Did old Maya observe Mercury?

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
J. Vondrák, V. Böhm, B. Böhm
{"title":"Did old Maya observe Mercury?","authors":"J. Vondrák, V. Böhm, B. Böhm","doi":"10.2298/saj211222002v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that the rich culture of old Maya contained, among other, also a very complicated and complex calendar, in which they recorded not only historical events, but also significant astronomical phenomena. Main source of information is the Dresden Codex, roughly covering the interval between 280 and 1325 AD. The problem of the so-called correlation between Mayan and our calendars (expressing the difference between Long Count of Mayan calendar and Julian date) is very old, there exist about fifty different solutions that mutually differ by up to hundreds of years. Out of these, historians mostly accept the so-called Goodman-Mart?nez-Thompson (GMT) value of 584 283 days, which is based almost entirely on historical events. On the contrary, we stressed very precisely dated astronomical data, demonstrated the contradictions of GMT with them, and derived the so-called B?hm correlation (BB) of 622 261 days, which is in excellent agreement with astronomical phenomena recorded in Dresden Codex. Maya researchers are mostly convinced that Maya did not pay much attention to Mercury. Here we conclude that the truth is opposite; we analyze the data in Dresden Codex and find many records corresponding to visibility of Mercury near its maximum elongations from the Sun, and also to their conjunctions.","PeriodicalId":48878,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Astronomical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Astronomical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/saj211222002v","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is well known that the rich culture of old Maya contained, among other, also a very complicated and complex calendar, in which they recorded not only historical events, but also significant astronomical phenomena. Main source of information is the Dresden Codex, roughly covering the interval between 280 and 1325 AD. The problem of the so-called correlation between Mayan and our calendars (expressing the difference between Long Count of Mayan calendar and Julian date) is very old, there exist about fifty different solutions that mutually differ by up to hundreds of years. Out of these, historians mostly accept the so-called Goodman-Mart?nez-Thompson (GMT) value of 584 283 days, which is based almost entirely on historical events. On the contrary, we stressed very precisely dated astronomical data, demonstrated the contradictions of GMT with them, and derived the so-called B?hm correlation (BB) of 622 261 days, which is in excellent agreement with astronomical phenomena recorded in Dresden Codex. Maya researchers are mostly convinced that Maya did not pay much attention to Mercury. Here we conclude that the truth is opposite; we analyze the data in Dresden Codex and find many records corresponding to visibility of Mercury near its maximum elongations from the Sun, and also to their conjunctions.
古玛雅观测到水星了吗?
众所周知,古玛雅丰富的文化包含了非常复杂的历法,其中不仅记录了历史事件,还记录了重要的天文现象。信息的主要来源是德累斯顿法典,大致涵盖了公元280年至1325年之间的时间。所谓的玛雅历法和我们的历法之间的相关性(表示玛雅历法和儒略历之间的差异)的问题是非常古老的,存在大约50种不同的解决方案,相互差异长达数百年。其中,历史学家大多接受所谓的古德曼-玛特?nez-Thompson (GMT)的值为584 283天,这几乎完全基于历史事件。相反,我们强调非常精确的天文数据,证明了GMT与它们的矛盾,并推导出所谓的B?hm相关性(BB)为622 261天,这与德累斯顿手抄本记录的天文现象非常吻合。玛雅研究人员大多认为,玛雅人并没有太关注水星。这里我们得出结论,真理是相反的;我们分析了德累斯顿手抄本中的数据,发现了许多与水星在离太阳最大伸长处的可见性相对应的记录,以及它们的连接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Serbian Astronomical Journal
Serbian Astronomical Journal ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Serbian Astronomical Journal publishes original observations and researches in all branches of astronomy. The journal publishes: Invited Reviews - review article on some up-to-date topic in astronomy, astrophysics and related fields (written upon invitation only), Original Scientific Papers - article in which are presented previously unpublished author''s own scientific results, Preliminary Reports - original scientific paper, but shorter in length and of preliminary nature, Professional Papers - articles offering experience useful for the improvement of professional practice i.e. article describing methods and techniques, software, presenting observational data, etc. In some cases the journal may publish other contributions, such as In Memoriam notes, Obituaries, Book Reviews, as well as Editorials, Addenda, Errata, Corrigenda, Retraction notes, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信