{"title":"Comment on Nordhaus: Tax Carbon, Not Fossil Fuels","authors":"R. Sedjo","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"William Nordhaus's proposal to tax fossil fuel at the source could be improved by taxing carbon emissions instead and thereby providing incentives for carbon capture and storage technology, according to Roger Sedjo.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1803","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economists Voice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
William Nordhaus's proposal to tax fossil fuel at the source could be improved by taxing carbon emissions instead and thereby providing incentives for carbon capture and storage technology, according to Roger Sedjo.
期刊介绍:
This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.