It Works for Mergers, Why not Finance

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS

Economists Voice Pub Date : 2010-01-27 DOI:10.2202/1553-3832.1749

A. Edlin, R. Gilbert

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many in finance, particularly the more lightly regulated areas of finance like hedge funds, are shocked at the idea of the government's prying eyes and intrusion in their business affairs. They shouldn't be: the government has long been intrusive when it comes to large mergers because they can threaten the public's interest. Merger policy could provide a useful guide for financial reform according to Aaron Edlin and Richard Gilbert, two antitrust specialists from UC Berkeley.

查看原文本刊更多论文

它适用于并购，为什么不适用于金融

许多金融业人士，尤其是像对冲基金这样监管较为宽松的金融领域，对政府窥探和干预其商业事务的想法感到震惊。他们不应该这样做:长期以来，政府在大型合并方面一直是干涉性的，因为它们可能威胁到公众的利益。加州大学伯克利分校(UC Berkeley)的两位反垄断专家亚伦•埃德林(Aaron Edlin)和理查德•吉尔伯特(Richard Gilbert)认为，合并政策可以为金融改革提供有用的指导。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Economists Voice ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.