Comment on Abrams and Parsons: CARS is Hardly a Clunker

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS

Economists Voice Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.2202/1553-3832.1713

A. Ching, Mikayla M Clark, Tania Dutta, Yan Zhu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Cash for Clunkers program is not such a clunker if one considers a fuller list of benefits, according to Anna Ching, Mika Clark, Tania Dutta and Yan Zhu.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评艾布拉姆斯和帕森斯:《汽车总动员》算不上旧车

安娜•秦、米卡•克拉克、塔尼亚•杜塔和朱燕认为，如果考虑到更全面的福利清单，“旧车换现金”计划就不是一项“旧车换现金”计划了。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Economists Voice ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.