Effects of insecticides intended for Ceutorhynchus napi Gyll. control in oilseed rape on ground beetles

L. Sivčev, I. Sivčev, D. Graora, V. Tomić, B. Dudić, W. Büchs, T. Gotlin-Čuljak
{"title":"Effects of insecticides intended for Ceutorhynchus napi Gyll. control in oilseed rape on ground beetles","authors":"L. Sivčev, I. Sivčev, D. Graora, V. Tomić, B. Dudić, W. Büchs, T. Gotlin-Čuljak","doi":"10.2298/PIF1704223S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY The effects of insecticides that are commonly used for conventional and integrated oilseed rape (OSR) management on ground beetles were studied. Monitoring of harmful species showed that only insecticides intended against Ceutorhynchus napi should be applied. There were no differences in beetle numbers and phenology of settling of C. napi in the OSR fields that received different management practices. The type of OSR management has a primary and significant impact on ground beetles abundance. Early in the spring, ground beetles settled more massively on the non-tilled OSR field with abundant weed cover and mulch on soil surface. However, there were no significant differences in species richness between the OSR fields managed differently. A total of 22 species were recorded. Early in the spring, the granivorous ground beetles Amara aenea (47.3%) and Harpalus distinguendus (32.5%) were dominant. When insecticides were applied, immigration of ground beetles began, so that their adverse effect was minimal. In both management systems the number of ground beetles and their diversity increased after spraying. In conclusion, no significant harmful effects of the insecticides on ground beetles were detected in OSR fields managed in two different ways.","PeriodicalId":19801,"journal":{"name":"Pesticidi I Fitomedicina","volume":"32 1","pages":"223-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesticidi I Fitomedicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/PIF1704223S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

SUMMARY The effects of insecticides that are commonly used for conventional and integrated oilseed rape (OSR) management on ground beetles were studied. Monitoring of harmful species showed that only insecticides intended against Ceutorhynchus napi should be applied. There were no differences in beetle numbers and phenology of settling of C. napi in the OSR fields that received different management practices. The type of OSR management has a primary and significant impact on ground beetles abundance. Early in the spring, ground beetles settled more massively on the non-tilled OSR field with abundant weed cover and mulch on soil surface. However, there were no significant differences in species richness between the OSR fields managed differently. A total of 22 species were recorded. Early in the spring, the granivorous ground beetles Amara aenea (47.3%) and Harpalus distinguendus (32.5%) were dominant. When insecticides were applied, immigration of ground beetles began, so that their adverse effect was minimal. In both management systems the number of ground beetles and their diversity increased after spraying. In conclusion, no significant harmful effects of the insecticides on ground beetles were detected in OSR fields managed in two different ways.
拟用于油菜的杀虫剂的效果。油菜对地甲虫的防治
摘要研究了油菜常规管理和综合管理常用杀虫剂对地甲虫的防治效果。有害物种监测结果表明,只应施用针对白喙库蚊的杀虫剂。不同管理方式下,褐飞虱的甲虫数量和沉降物候特征无显著差异。OSR管理类型对地面甲虫丰度具有主要和显著的影响。在早春,地面甲虫在土壤表面有丰富杂草覆盖和覆盖物的未耕OSR田大量定居。然而,不同管理方式的土壤物种丰富度差异不显著。共记录22种。早春时,以石质地甲Amara aenea(47.3%)和Harpalus distinguendus(32.5%)为主;当使用杀虫剂时,地面甲虫开始迁移,因此它们的不利影响最小。在两种管理系统中,喷洒后地甲虫的数量和多样性均有所增加。综上所述,在两种不同管理方式下,均未发现杀虫剂对地甲虫的显著有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信