Abortion training in U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs, 1998.

Rene Almeling, Laureen Tews, S. Dudley
{"title":"Abortion training in U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs, 1998.","authors":"Rene Almeling, Laureen Tews, S. Dudley","doi":"10.2307/2648194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nSince the late 1970s, the number of obstetrics and gynecology residency programs providing abortion training in the United States has steadily decreased. Given the documented shortage of abortion providers, assessing and ensuring the availability of abortion training in graduate medical education is critical.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn 1998, the National Abortion Federation surveyed the 261 accredited U.S. residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology, and analyzed the availability of first- and second-trimester abortion training.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 179 programs that responded to the survey, 81% reported that they offer first-trimester abortion training--46% routinely and 34% as an elective. Seventy-four percent of programs offer second-trimester training--44% routinely and 29% as an elective. Some programs that do not offer training give residents the option of obtaining it elsewhere. While 26% of programs indicated that all residents in their programs receive abortion training, 40% said that fewer than half are trained, including 14% that train no residents. The operating room is the most common training site: Fifty-nine percent of programs reported that abortion training takes place in the operating room.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAfter a decades-long decline in the availability of abortion training, opportunities for abortion training have increased. However, there is reason to be cautious in interpreting these results, including possible response bias and pressure to report the availability of abortion training because of new guidelines from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.","PeriodicalId":75844,"journal":{"name":"Family planning perspectives","volume":"32 6 1","pages":"268-71, 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2648194","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2648194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

CONTEXT Since the late 1970s, the number of obstetrics and gynecology residency programs providing abortion training in the United States has steadily decreased. Given the documented shortage of abortion providers, assessing and ensuring the availability of abortion training in graduate medical education is critical. METHODS In 1998, the National Abortion Federation surveyed the 261 accredited U.S. residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology, and analyzed the availability of first- and second-trimester abortion training. RESULTS Of the 179 programs that responded to the survey, 81% reported that they offer first-trimester abortion training--46% routinely and 34% as an elective. Seventy-four percent of programs offer second-trimester training--44% routinely and 29% as an elective. Some programs that do not offer training give residents the option of obtaining it elsewhere. While 26% of programs indicated that all residents in their programs receive abortion training, 40% said that fewer than half are trained, including 14% that train no residents. The operating room is the most common training site: Fifty-nine percent of programs reported that abortion training takes place in the operating room. CONCLUSIONS After a decades-long decline in the availability of abortion training, opportunities for abortion training have increased. However, there is reason to be cautious in interpreting these results, including possible response bias and pressure to report the availability of abortion training because of new guidelines from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
1998年,美国妇产科住院医师项目中的堕胎培训。
自20世纪70年代末以来,在美国提供堕胎培训的妇产科住院医师项目的数量稳步下降。鉴于有记录的堕胎提供者短缺,评估和确保在研究生医学教育中提供堕胎培训至关重要。方法1998年,美国国家流产联合会调查了261家经认证的美国妇产科住院医师培训项目,并分析了妊娠早期和中期流产培训的可获得性。结果在接受调查的179个项目中,81%的项目提供妊娠早期堕胎培训,其中46%为常规培训,34%为选修课。74%的项目提供妊娠中期培训——44%为常规培训,29%为选修课。一些不提供培训的项目让住院医生可以选择从其他地方获得培训。26%的项目表示他们项目中的所有住院医生都接受过堕胎培训,40%的项目表示接受过培训的不到一半,其中14%的项目没有培训住院医生。手术室是最常见的培训场所:59%的项目报告堕胎培训是在手术室进行的。结论:经过几十年的流产培训的可获得性下降,流产培训的机会增加了。然而,有理由在解释这些结果时保持谨慎,包括可能的反应偏差和报告堕胎培训可用性的压力,因为研究生医学教育认证委员会发布了新的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信